Topic: ‘Safe Schools Czar’ Funded Anti-Christian Gay Porn Art E
Anonimoose's photo
Fri 10/23/09 12:17 PM





But white men in power can be far more dangerous than just an average person.


Wow that is no way a racial statement.


Nope because I am white and can talk about white folks, I know them intimately.


You know ALL "white folks" intimately? huh noway




Wow ... and I don't even remember that ...


You have a dirty mind.

I know quite a few of them. That counts.


No, it doesn't count, because each of us is an INDIVIDUAL. We each have our own brain, our own talents, our own experiences, etc. The fact that you would lump a whole lot of people together based on a factor about which they can do nothing (e.g., the color of their skin) is not only absurd, it is downright disgusting.

Dragoness's photo
Fri 10/23/09 12:23 PM






But white men in power can be far more dangerous than just an average person.


Wow that is no way a racial statement.


Nope because I am white and can talk about white folks, I know them intimately.


You know ALL "white folks" intimately? huh noway




Wow ... and I don't even remember that ...


You have a dirty mind.

I know quite a few of them. That counts.


No, it doesn't count, because each of us is an INDIVIDUAL. We each have our own brain, our own talents, our own experiences, etc. The fact that you would lump a whole lot of people together based on a factor about which they can do nothing (e.g., the color of their skin) is not only absurd, it is downright disgusting.


Did I say all?


Did I include all white folks?



So don't try to put your issues on me.

There are dangerous white men in this world. Cannot be disputed.

We are the nation that has the history of powerful white men running the country so we have the history to prove what they can be capable of.


Nice try though but not valid.

Anonimoose's photo
Fri 10/23/09 12:37 PM







But white men in power can be far more dangerous than just an average person.


Wow that is no way a racial statement.


Nope because I am white and can talk about white folks, I know them intimately.


You know ALL "white folks" intimately? huh noway




Wow ... and I don't even remember that ...


You have a dirty mind.

I know quite a few of them. That counts.


No, it doesn't count, because each of us is an INDIVIDUAL. We each have our own brain, our own talents, our own experiences, etc. The fact that you would lump a whole lot of people together based on a factor about which they can do nothing (e.g., the color of their skin) is not only absurd, it is downright disgusting.


Did I say all?


Did I include all white folks?



So don't try to put your issues on me.

There are dangerous white men in this world. Cannot be disputed.

We are the nation that has the history of powerful white men running the country so we have the history to prove what they can be capable of.


Nice try though but not valid.


By making your blanket statement, you were implicitly saying that anyone who shares the traits of being a white and a man is dangerous simply because of those traits.

The world is full of history outside the United States, and that history proves that ANYONE, regardless of their race, creed, gender, etc., can be "dangerous". There are also countless examples of people being kind and good. Some of them, I assure you, are white males. However, I'm sure you would consider them anomalies, rather than ponder the possibility that perhaps it doesn't matter what race or gender they are, because they are individuals.

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 10/23/09 12:52 PM


If we’ve learned anything in recent months, it’s that if you’re a racist, a Marxist, a Maoist, a domestic terrorist or any other variety of anti-American nut, the safest place to be is in the company of Barack Obama. If you can stay off the radar of Fox News and don’t get caught on tape giving advice on running a brothel for fun and profit, you get to influence the most powerful executive in the world.

Case in point: Obama’s “Safe Schools Czar,” Kevin Jennings. While nobody’s yet found out exactly what he knows about safe schools, we do know he’s an expert at pushing a gay agenda in public grammar schools. We know he’s praised the founder of the North American Man-Boy Love Association. And thanks to “the pro-family action center for Massachusetts,” Mass Resistance, now we know he’s an art maven. (Warning: site contains many offensive images from the installation. The site’s blog has also been flagged by Google as objectionable – which, given Google’s political leanings, may be a badge of honor.)


Story Continues Below Ad ↓
An exhibit of pornographic and anti-Christian gay art called “ACT UP New York: Activism, Art, and the AIDS Crisis, 1987-1993,” is currently on display at the Harvard Art Museum in Cambridge, Mass. Guess who helped fund the collection of lewd, graphic and deliberately offensive “art?” You Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings.

Jennings appears on a list of contributors who provided “gifts and grants” to make the exhibit possible.

According to a Harvard Art Museum press release, “important and commemorative exhibition” “shows the critical intelligence that artists bring to bear when it comes to movements for social change.” That, and filthy pictures. In one, a Catholic Bishop is juxtaposed with a used condom. Photos of male and female genitals, homosexual activity, posters targeting Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush as murderers and pieces glorifying sadomasochism are included. (Presumably, the S&M won’t be part of any Safe Schools initiatives.)

Certainly, the networks and CNN will jump on this new revelation about Jennings…Any day now… they’re just gonna do some…investigative reporting…

http://2yo.us/305




racist-----huh Who and what did they say/do?huh


a Marxist-------huh Who and what did they say/do?huh



a Maoist----------huh Who and what did they say/do?huh

earthytaurus76's photo
Fri 10/23/09 01:35 PM
Edited by earthytaurus76 on Fri 10/23/09 02:16 PM
There are a whole lot of rich white men who got that way by hard work, and innovative ideas,and inventions, which shaped, and molded this country.


We all know there are also people of other races who do as well.

If this is not enough of a politically correct explanation here are the successors.

http://www.black-collegian.com/african/aaprofil.shtml

Ok.. I left out some races.. Theres always google.


Generalizing about "rich white men" and how dangerous they are is the same thing as stereotyping "poor black men".. as "dangerous".


If that were said, there would be an uproar.

Do we really have room for self loathing, and a sheeple attitude?


I mean.. post your views, but seriously no matter what race you are,

please keep your racist comments to yourself.


You dont EARN points because you are making racist comments about your own race. Racist comments can come from any mouth.. USUALLY from a different race, not ALWAYS.

rac⋅ism  /ˈreɪsɪzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [rey-siz-uhm] Show IPA
Use racist in a Sentence
See web results for racist
See images of racist
–noun 1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.

norslyman's photo
Fri 10/23/09 03:28 PM
Also, the Pedophile Protection bill just passed (Hate Crimes).

Why in the H double hockeysticks do they allow bills to piggyback on a larger bill?

It is the stupidest thing in the world. I could maybe see if they were related, but a defense spending bill?

Also, there is some evidence Obama himself is/was gay. It is a sytem of control for blackmailing politicians. Very common. Bush did gay acts with his Skull & Bones buddies, so should we expect anything different from Obamanation?

no photo
Fri 10/23/09 04:54 PM

Also, the Pedophile Protection bill just passed (Hate Crimes).

Why in the H double hockeysticks do they allow bills to piggyback on a larger bill?

It is the stupidest thing in the world. I could maybe see if they were related, but a defense spending bill?

Also, there is some evidence Obama himself is/was gay. It is a sytem of control for blackmailing politicians. Very common. Bush did gay acts with his Skull & Bones buddies, so should we expect anything different from Obamanation?


I don't believe that for a minute, but so what if he was. You scared of a gay black president? Oh and Bush too? lmao For pete sakes folks, get a grip. Some of you need a serious shrink...

Dragoness's photo
Fri 10/23/09 04:58 PM








But white men in power can be far more dangerous than just an average person.


Wow that is no way a racial statement.


Nope because I am white and can talk about white folks, I know them intimately.


You know ALL "white folks" intimately? huh noway




Wow ... and I don't even remember that ...


You have a dirty mind.

I know quite a few of them. That counts.


No, it doesn't count, because each of us is an INDIVIDUAL. We each have our own brain, our own talents, our own experiences, etc. The fact that you would lump a whole lot of people together based on a factor about which they can do nothing (e.g., the color of their skin) is not only absurd, it is downright disgusting.


Did I say all?


Did I include all white folks?



So don't try to put your issues on me.

There are dangerous white men in this world. Cannot be disputed.

We are the nation that has the history of powerful white men running the country so we have the history to prove what they can be capable of.


Nice try though but not valid.


By making your blanket statement, you were implicitly saying that anyone who shares the traits of being a white and a man is dangerous simply because of those traits.

The world is full of history outside the United States, and that history proves that ANYONE, regardless of their race, creed, gender, etc., can be "dangerous". There are also countless examples of people being kind and good. Some of them, I assure you, are white males. However, I'm sure you would consider them anomalies, rather than ponder the possibility that perhaps it doesn't matter what race or gender they are, because they are individuals.


The only blanket I used here was to call the truth the truth. There are some dangerous rich white men. We are suffering in this country right now from some of them.


Dragoness's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:01 PM

There are a whole lot of rich white men who got that way by hard work, and innovative ideas,and inventions, which shaped, and molded this country.


We all know there are also people of other races who do as well.

If this is not enough of a politically correct explanation here are the successors.

http://www.black-collegian.com/african/aaprofil.shtml

Ok.. I left out some races.. Theres always google.


Generalizing about "rich white men" and how dangerous they are is the same thing as stereotyping "poor black men".. as "dangerous".


If that were said, there would be an uproar.

Do we really have room for self loathing, and a sheeple attitude?


I mean.. post your views, but seriously no matter what race you are,

please keep your racist comments to yourself.


You dont EARN points because you are making racist comments about your own race. Racist comments can come from any mouth.. USUALLY from a different race, not ALWAYS.

rac⋅ism  /ˈreɪsɪzəm/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [rey-siz-uhm] Show IPA
Use racist in a Sentence
See web results for racist
See images of racist
–noun 1. a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
2. a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.
3. hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.




LOL, none of what I said fits the definition of racism you provided so I guess that makes my statement not racist by your own definition.

Dangerous white men in power are the reasons we suffer in this country right now.


Atlantis75's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:05 PM
Edited by Atlantis75 on Fri 10/23/09 05:06 PM
I thought "Czars" were in the 17th century in Russia. It's another name for the "ruling elite", the "royal bloods" the "kings".

Apparently they are resurfacing in USA in the 21st. century.

Obama is gonna be a "ceasar" one day?

Thomas3474's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:17 PM
I'm seriously starting to wonder if we could have elected anyone worse than Obama to run this country.Maybe we would have had better luck if we just plucked up a homeless guy out of the gutter and put him in the white house because this guy doesn't have a clue what he is doing or who he is picking to run some of his programs.

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:21 PM
Edited by MirrorMirror on Fri 10/23/09 05:42 PM
:smile: Czar was the King of Russia.:smile:The last Czar Romanov was killed by the communists that siezed control of Russia in a revolution.:smile: So does that mean the people that are against Obamas czars are communists?:smile:

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:24 PM
Edited by MirrorMirror on Fri 10/23/09 05:42 PM
:smile: So the Romanov family is taking over America behind the scenes?:smile: Legend has it that Czarina Anastasia Romanov escaped the massacre of her family at the hands of the communists.:smile: You think she could be behind this?:smile: She would be very old by now.:smile: The Romanovs were also related to the British Royals so could they perhaps be involved as well?:smile: Is this a plan for England to reconquer America?scared

Atlantis75's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:27 PM
But why even use that title? What's the point and who started this "czar" this and that?

Dragoness's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:30 PM
Mirror:wink: laugh

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:30 PM
Edited by MirrorMirror on Fri 10/23/09 05:33 PM

But why even use that title? What's the point and who started this "czar" this and that?
:smile: The word "czar" is just a term.:smile: There have been "czars" in the goverment for decades.:smile: Like Ronald Reagans drug czar.:smile: And it certainly isnt a communist or socialist term since the communists and socialists murdered the Czars. :smile: The Czar Romanovs were captialists:smile:

Dragoness's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:32 PM
Edited by Dragoness on Fri 10/23/09 05:32 PM

But why even use that title? What's the point and who started this "czar" this and that?


It has to be those who claim all liberals are socialist communists who think "czar" has to be an association with the socialist communist part.:wink:

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:34 PM


But why even use that title? What's the point and who started this "czar" this and that?


It has to be those who claim all liberals are socialist communists who think "czar" has to be an association with the socialist communist part.:wink:
:smile: Yeah, and in reality the communist/socialist murdered the Czar Romanovs.:smile: The Czars Romanovs were capitalists:smile:

Dragoness's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:37 PM



But why even use that title? What's the point and who started this "czar" this and that?


It has to be those who claim all liberals are socialist communists who think "czar" has to be an association with the socialist communist part.:wink:
:smile: Yeah, and in reality the communist/socialist murdered the Czar Romanovs.:smile: The Czars Romanovs were capitalists:smile:


Capitalists, you say?

MirrorMirror's photo
Fri 10/23/09 05:41 PM
Edited by MirrorMirror on Fri 10/23/09 05:41 PM




But why even use that title? What's the point and who started this "czar" this and that?


It has to be those who claim all liberals are socialist communists who think "czar" has to be an association with the socialist communist part.:wink:
:smile: Yeah, and in reality the communist/socialist murdered the Czar Romanovs.:smile: The Czars Romanovs were capitalists:smile:


Capitalists, you say?
flowerforyou yep:thumbsup: