How do you hold someone responsible for words he was accused of saying but never said?

Obama DOES have a chip on his shoulder...Powell DID endorse Obama because he's black...why else would a conservative support a Liberal...and...opinions need not be researched...they come straight from the heart...

Where is that chip? Only racists see it?

Powell had limited choices to support and he said why he supported Obama, his word is no good in a racists eyes?

That's right all opposition are racists. You need to get off the racists thing. You make no valid points on anything in this thread because all you do is resort to calling everyone racist. It's getting a little old.
Like I have asked many times you need to show proof of someome being racist if you are going to call people that word. And just because you say they are isn't a good enough reason.
When you say because of the things he says then show what he said to back up your accusation.

I show as much "proof" for my views as all others do so mine are as acceptable as everyone elses including yours.

So now that we have established my opinion is just as valid as yours. We can get to the fact that Rush's reason for seeing a chip is because he is racist. His reason for all the black on black associations with black folks is because he is racist.

It is obvious. Along with his homophobia, and sick view of the world.

I have listened to his show, he seems like a bigot. Everyone has their own perception based on their own experiences,, and that is mine. Doesnt mean he isnt fantastic entertainment or any number of other things though.

Obama DOES have a chip on his shoulder...Powell DID endorse Obama because he's black...why else would a conservative support a Liberal...and...opinions need not be researched...they come straight from the heart...

I read the same garbage day after day that you post...try listening to his show before you cast judgement...Rush is anything but racist...and like he says...how do you know when you've won an arguement with a Liberal ?...they call you a racist...

"For a white male , the man just assumes far too much about what black individuals do, why they do it, and what other people think about it."

And his motivation for those opinions obviously is all racist, all you have to do is listen and hear him.

You've shown no proof of anything.
Your going of your opinion of Rush.

The NFL lets Michael Vick play,but Limbaugh can't own a team. I'm no fan of Limbaugh,but at least he never killed innocent dogs. be seeing you

Who says the dogs were innocent? Vick is a player who respects the game and the players.....be seeing YOU

I have listened to his show, he seems like a bigot. Everyone has their own perception based on their own experiences,, and that is mine. Doesnt mean he isnt fantastic entertainment or any number of other things though.

You have shown no proof he isn't a racist so now what???

Wow that has to be one of the most ignorant statements I've heard so far. You are the one accusing him of being a racist, PROVE IT!
You can't because it's your opinion not facts!

I posted earlier an article about the statement's that Rush was accused of saying.

Wow that has to be one of the most ignorant statements I've heard so far. You are the one accusing him of being a racist, PROVE IT!
You can't because it's your opinion not facts!

I posted earlier an article about the statement's that Rush was accused of saying.

LOL it's getting even better.
I wonder who will win in courts.



http://2yo.us/190
Al Sharpton Threatens Defamation Lawsuit Against Rush Limbaugh
By Noel Sheppard (Bio | Archive)
October 18, 2009 - 02:02 ET

After participating in a smear campaign that removed Rush Limbaugh from possible ownership of the St. Louis Rams, Al Sharpton is threatening the conservative talk radio host with a defamation lawsuit for his op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal Saturday.

In the article titled "The Race Card, Football and Me," Limbaugh wrote:

In 1998 Mr. Sharpton was found guilty of defamation and ordered to pay $65,000 for falsely accusing a New York prosecutor of rape in the 1987 Tawana Brawley case. He also played a leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot (he called neighborhood Jews "diamond merchants") and 1995 Freddie's Fashion Mart riot.

According to CNN, Sharpton isn't happy about this:

Story Continues Below Ad ↓
"Mr. Limbaugh's blatant and defamatory statements regarding the Crown Heights Riots falsely give the impression that Rev. Sharpton was present during the violence that occurred when in reality he had been called in by the family after the violence," Sharpton’s statement says.

"In terms of Freddie's Fashion Mart, Rev. Al Sharpton, along with local elected officials supported the protests. However, a lone gunman who disagreed with the nonviolent nature of the protests entered the store and killed seven people and himself… For Mr. Limbaugh to imply that Rev. Sharpton has anything to do with someone that killed people and himself is blatantly wrong," the statement continues.

The New York Daily News elaborated:

"I am definitely going to prove he makes reckless, unaccountable statements," Sharpton said. "Which is why he was forced out of buying an NFL team in the first place." [...]

"He doesn't have the right to lie and accuse people of crimes," Sharpton said. "He wants to criminalize me.

"That's what got him in trouble. He tried to criminalize the NFL players, calling them Crips and Bloods."

More from the Palm Beach Post:

“Not only did Rush Limbaugh try to criminalize the NFL,” Sharpton told Page2Live, “but now he is saying I’m a criminal. He can call me a race-baiter and all that stuff like he does. But don’t call me a criminal. [...]
“I’ve sued the GOP before and Rush knows that,” Sharpton said. “(Former Republican National Committee Jim) Nicholson accused me of something similar, and I sued (for $30 million). We settled when he issued an apology.

“This is going to cost Rush. He’s making himself look worse.”