Topic: Are animals for eatting? | |
---|---|
Lol! enjoy!
|
|
|
|
Lol! enjoy!
|
|
|
|
Your not pointing out logic,your just proving your own blunt immature supidity,anybody who compairs the two like you have,are on a level a have no time of day for,have a nice life..mabey you,l be brave anough to actaly kill,instead of just dreaming........its not all that. I am pointing out logic, which is why you haven't come up with a suitable enough argument to defend your position. I'm hearing the same stuff from you that I can get off the nearest vegetarian website or meeting, nothing new. Yet I'm arguing it the same as I always have argued it, the same logic, never shaky or wavering...always the same. And I get around the same response, either I'm stupid or someone wants to kick my ***...helluva comeback, wouldn't you say? |
|
|
|
yes
|
|
|
|
Tastes Like Chicken.
|
|
|
|
The moral imperative, perhaps from some ingrained religious upbringing, would keep a man hungry even though there is meat around him in the form of other men, who may or may not already be dead meat. The survival instinct would see things differently. Meat is meat. And then ther is the essence of one mans fish is another mans poisson.
|
|
|
|
**I think this topic has run its course. We'll all just have to agree to disagree on this one. Topic locked.**
|
|
|