I have an explanation yes, but I'm looking for what others have to say. I just know sometimes I am wrong.

Only sometimes and usually about myself.

I hear your pain, Atlantis, and I apologize for my earlier response that can be viewed a disrespectful.

But I must tell you where we, your forum respondents, stand. This is a logical logistics problem (the flow of information and the mismatching of the meaningful connection):

You keep saying what you don't do. This post I quoted from you actually was the most useful so far. Here you named actual, tangible things that you don't do.

But you keep on telling us generalities, what you don't do, how you don't do it, and you ask us why that elicits the response (or lack thereof).

Well. If you told us what you say, and not in generalities, but quoting an actual (or sample) letter you get and write back to, we may, by a small margin, be in a better position to answer your call for advice. But it's only going to work for that one example.

Very apparently there is a trend there in your correspondences. The trend is hard to see without seeing a lot, and I mean a lot, of examples of that same trend. Consider, please, that we must gather information first on the apparent, then we must analyze, sythesize, and process the information, try different approaches to solving the problem, and then maybe we can come up with a solution to why nobody writes to you again.

This task can only be done by us if we see a number of illustrations of the goings-on in email notes. Without even one example, how do you expect us to give you advice regarding:

1. What's wrong with the women;
2. Why they don't respond again;
3. Whether it's something you do that causes this phenomenon;
3a. Since you're the only common element in all these dealings and email goings-on;
4. Point with precision at the problem;
5. And tell you what the truth is.

In fact, your original post said, "what does it tell you" and we got you answers, diverse as the sky in above the horizon, because you don't give us any clues to go on. You keep presenting a problem only solvable by knowing the details, and you withhold the details. The skimpy details you provide are negative statements, which deny the some events or features, but it still leaves exatly three trillion possible reasons. Do you want us to recite all three trillion reasons, and ask after each one "is it this one?"

We're not here to upset you. It's just you put us to an impossible task, and I wish to have pointed out to you what the crux of the impossibility is that you present and ask us to do.

I personally resent beign put to task like this. I don't know if it's games playing on your part, or you sincerely think it's fun for us to feel our way in the dark and take stabs at it. I don't enjoy this sort of problem solving; it smacks of high school, where more and more clues are given until some lucky student hits the jackpot and comes up with the answer the teacher had in mind.

In real life most of the time there are no answers, there are no solutions, there are no resolutions. This site I consider real life, since I haven't got any other life to speak of.

It's just my opinion, but I thought I would give you it anyway.

You may be different, but you are an interesting man. But that may fade, because there are some types of strange men that can only hold your interest until the novelty value fades away.

This is not a value judgement on you, I don't even know if this IS you what I wrote. Even if you are that, I don't hold this as a blame -- only as an explanation. We are each different. Somehwat.

Should you try being a complete jerk? I think complete would be going to an extreme. You have an edge, but very soon that facade falls and we see a sweet, if just a bit perplexed guy.

Maybe your attraction to the women is that you project "edge" and when they put their thums to the blade, it feels like a snail.

I don't know. That did not come out right. Sorry. You see my point?

Sometimes it's hard to tell if it's one of those times that you're wrong, when you say "sometimes I am wrong".

Don't think about this too much. It made my grandmother regress to her infancy and she could only walk around in ever-expanding concentric circles after that.

I ll always reply to your emails

I reply if not just because I'm a friendly type of guy...

cool

yes

In a general way, are you asking questions about the other person? Is your responses to what they ask a solid end or does it allow for other questions or responses to come back? Keeping the email flow going like a conversation?

Curiously