Previous 1
Topic: Quadriplegic Marine denied free entrance to amusement park
ThomasJB's photo
Wed 06/17/09 10:38 AM

Family angry when paralyzed Marine Joshua Hoffman is denied free entrance to Michigan's Adventure
by Ted Roelofs | The Grand Rapids Press
Wednesday June 17, 2009, 8:45 AM

Quadriplegic former Marine Joshua Hoffman waited in a van at Michigan's Adventure, hoping to see fiancee Heather Lovell in the park for an hour or two. Her father, Rockford resident Joel Lovell, explained to park staff that Hoffman is paralyzed and cannot talk. He assumed Hoffman would be admitted free.

But Lovell was told he would have to pay admission for Hoffman and the nurse tending to his medical needs. No exceptions.

"He went to Iraq for all of us and took a bullet in the neck. He sacrificed everything for his country," Joel Lovell said.

"I was just kind of stunned."

According to Heather Lovell, she and Hoffman planned to rendezvous from their home near Middleville on May 29 at the Muskegon County park, before heading to Reed City for the high school graduation of Hoffman's stepbrother.

Lovell had gone ahead to act as chaperone for a niece and others on a school outing. Joel Lovell picked up Hoffman and his nurse and headed for the park.

But Heather Lovell said she got a call from her father telling her to come to the park entrance.

"It was really just outrageous," she said. "He is not physically going on any rides. To me, this is very personal."

Hoffman, 27, was paralyzed from the chest down when he was hit by a sniper's bullet in Iraq in January 2007. He spent more than a year in a Virginia Veterans Administration hospital before coming home in March 2008.

He and Lovell, 22, share a specially equipped house with 24-hour nursing staff to assist Hoffman.

Camille Jourden-Mark, general manager of Michigan's Adventure, said park policy does not allow any non-participants in free.

"We just can't be in a position of picking and choosing. We have grandparents (who pay admission) that come in our park every day that have no intention of ever going on a ride.

"It's not based on the level of participation."

On Tuesday, Jourden-Mark offered complementary passes for Hoffman and a guest to Michigan's Adventure in response to the issue. Lovell said she has not decided whether she and Hoffman will use the passes.

"You want to be appreciative of it, but it took a lot of people complaining to them to realize what kind of mistake they had made," Lovell said. "We weren't looking for a free trip. It's just a problem with the policy."

Jourden-Mark said company policy is meant to shield employees from accusations of discrimination, but added "there are times when we make exceptions and this is definitely one of those times."

She noted the park offers one free admission with a paid admission for service members each Memorial Day. Jourden-Mark said park staff were unaware of Hoffman's condition.

"I don't think anybody was really aware that he was a veteran."

That's not what Joel Lovell, 54, recalled.

"I told (a park official) it is really a crummy policy. I explained that he is an Iraq veteran. He got shot in the neck and can't eat or talk. I thought they were joking."

Lovell said he initially was told he would have to pay the adult admission fee of $25 each for Hoffman and the nurse, then was offered a student discount.

Heather Lovell's sister, Belding resident Rebecca Lovell, said she contacted the park Friday to complain.

"I explained the extent of his injuries, that he was simply going for an hour or two.

"(A park official) said there was no proof of his injury. He could be faking it. She said if we let him come in for free, then we have to change our policy."

"I was absolutely blown away."

-- Press reporter Jacob Carpenter contributed to this story.

http://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/index.ssf/2009/06/family_angry_when_paralyzed_ma.html

franshade's photo
Wed 06/17/09 10:42 AM
wow slaphead

ThomasJB's photo
Wed 06/17/09 10:46 AM

(A park official) said there was no proof of his injury. He could be faking it.


That would be a lot of work for $50.

tanyaann's photo
Wed 06/17/09 10:50 AM
It's Michigan. I wouldn't expect anything different from my home state. Especially a tourist town! ohwell

franshade's photo
Wed 06/17/09 10:52 AM

Wow, this truly sucks I have accompanied handicapped people to parks, the parks and their employees are usually more accommodating than the employees at this park.

Jill298's photo
Wed 06/17/09 10:52 AM
That's how they earn they extra money. By charging people that aren't riding. It's a policy.
I don't think they should have expected to get him in for free. Tho I can see why they would want him in for free, and tho if it was me working, I would have let him in. But, when is it discrimination then? I can see where the park was put in a tough position. I honestly don't think the family should have assumed he would be let in for free before they got there. And then made a big fuss about it. They should have called ahead and spoken to someone at the park prior to their arrival.

tanyaann's photo
Wed 06/17/09 10:53 AM


Wow, this truly sucks I have accompanied handicapped people to parks, the parks and their employees are usually more accommodating than the employees at this park.


It's a little crappy amusement park... its $25 dollars but thats for both the rides and the water slides.

Jill298's photo
Wed 06/17/09 10:56 AM
I get people ALL the time that want a discount at my hotel because well they aren't going to go swimming or eat breakfast in the morning.
I still have to pay to have the amenities there, whether YOU personally use them or not. You have the option to use them. If you don't want that, then stay somewhere else. I get ticked when people feel they are entitled to discounts because they didn't use the free shampoo or something.
On the other hand... I typically extend discounts to those in the armed forces. I'm only supposed to offer to those travelling on official business.
But I give it to people that are retired and travelling for vacation as well because I think we just should do something for them.

no photo
Wed 06/17/09 10:56 AM

That's how they earn they extra money. By charging people that aren't riding. It's a policy.
I don't think they should have expected to get him in for free. Tho I can see why they would want him in for free, and tho if it was me working, I would have let him in. But, when is it discrimination then? I can see where the park was put in a tough position. I honestly don't think the family should have assumed he would be let in for free before they got there. And then made a big fuss about it. They should have called ahead and spoken to someone at the park prior to their arrival.


No, that would constitute common sense, not allowed. Sorry, its policy.

yellowrose10's photo
Wed 06/17/09 10:57 AM

That's how they earn they extra money. By charging people that aren't riding. It's a policy.
I don't think they should have expected to get him in for free. Tho I can see why they would want him in for free, and tho if it was me working, I would have let him in. But, when is it discrimination then? I can see where the park was put in a tough position. I honestly don't think the family should have assumed he would be let in for free before they got there. And then made a big fuss about it. They should have called ahead and spoken to someone at the park prior to their arrival.


I tend to agree. I would have let him in, but if it was me, I wouldn't assume

Jill298's photo
Wed 06/17/09 11:01 AM


That's how they earn they extra money. By charging people that aren't riding. It's a policy.
I don't think they should have expected to get him in for free. Tho I can see why they would want him in for free, and tho if it was me working, I would have let him in. But, when is it discrimination then? I can see where the park was put in a tough position. I honestly don't think the family should have assumed he would be let in for free before they got there. And then made a big fuss about it. They should have called ahead and spoken to someone at the park prior to their arrival.


I tend to agree. I would have let him in, but if it was me, I wouldn't assume
exactly. They assumed that they would just get in for free and then made a big fuss about it when they didn't get it. The park is right... what if they had to let parents or grandparents that don't ride the rides in for free... then they wouldn't make enough money to stay open.
If you want that, you go to a carnival and buy a wrist band.

no photo
Wed 06/17/09 11:02 AM
Edited by KimmiM on Wed 06/17/09 11:05 AM
I want to preface my response by saying that I am an avid supporter of our Armed Forces. I was married to a career Marine. I have several family members and friends that are service, have served and have died for our country. I'm sure I'm going to get blasted for this, but I this bothers me.

While normally I side with veterans on most everything, I do however have a bit of problem with this assumption of "entitlement". I understand that this man has essentially given his life for our country, I do not think that gives him (or his family members) the right to assume that he gets to go and do for free. The park official that stated "We just can't be in a position of picking and choosing. We have grandparents (who pay admission) that come in our park every day that have no intention of ever going on a ride." is completely within their rights to require payment.

I think if these people had called ahead, talked with management, etc., that this could have been handled much more diplomatically. But to assume that he'd be admitted for free is a load of hooey.

I'm as patriotic as anyone. My ex husband is a disabled Veteran that has been treated badly by society. But he has no preconceived notion that he gets a free ride because he has titanium to hold his spine together, will likely die at an early age due to "Gulf War Syndrome", has been shot, stabbed, left for dead, or the multitude of other issues that come with being career military.

Ok... *Rant Off*! bigsmile

franshade's photo
Wed 06/17/09 11:02 AM


That's how they earn they extra money. By charging people that aren't riding. It's a policy.
I don't think they should have expected to get him in for free. Tho I can see why they would want him in for free, and tho if it was me working, I would have let him in. But, when is it discrimination then? I can see where the park was put in a tough position. I honestly don't think the family should have assumed he would be let in for free before they got there. And then made a big fuss about it. They should have called ahead and spoken to someone at the park prior to their arrival.


No, that would constitute common sense, not allowed. Sorry, its policy.


Granted visitors should have communicated w/park prior.

Park employee should have had some sort of tact or found a supervisor and taken care of this a little differently.

Guess which park I won't visit laugh


common sense = sounds like if the majority of the people should have this, but betcha its a rarity.

yellowrose10's photo
Wed 06/17/09 11:05 AM
well said Kimmi


ALF98632's photo
Wed 06/17/09 11:27 AM
unfrigginbelievable.

ThomasJB's photo
Wed 06/17/09 11:34 AM
Seems Michigan is lacking common sense all around. Why didn't family call ahead instead of assuming and why couldn't the park make an exception or contact someone higher up.

yellowrose10's photo
Wed 06/17/09 11:35 AM
the park is a business and makes money

it would have been good PR to let him in for free, but not for the family to just assume

beachbum069's photo
Wed 06/17/09 11:38 AM
Six Flags normal policy is to charge admission for a handicapped person but the group gets a Fast Pass, which gets them to head of line.

yellowrose10's photo
Wed 06/17/09 11:39 AM

Six Flags normal policy is to charge admission for a handicapped person but the group gets a Fast Pass, which gets them to head of line.


very true. at 6 flags...there are other things there as well as rides...shows, etc

Jill298's photo
Wed 06/17/09 11:42 AM


(A park official) said there was no proof of his injury. He could be faking it.


That would be a lot of work for $50.
I've seen people try to scam for less. Tho I highly doubt he was "faking it"

Previous 1