Topic: Terrorist Strike Wichita!!
yellowrose10's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:16 PM
drinker just say I am right already laugh

adj4u's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:17 PM

drinker just say I am right already laugh


na yer a left leaning moderate


:wink: laugh

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:20 PM
oooooooo dem's fighting words...put up your dukes laugh

adj4u's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:21 PM
i coulda said moderate leaning liberal



:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

thats as duked as it gets

:wink: laugh laugh laugh

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:23 PM
keep digging adj...keep on digginglaugh

adj4u's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:27 PM

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:27 PM
explode

adj4u's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:32 PM

explode




fire in the ----

i can't say that she would take it the wrong way


flowerforyou flowerforyou

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:34 PM
rofl punk

adj4u's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:35 PM
drinker drinker

drinks drinks

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 06/01/09 02:44 PM
WICHITA, Kan. (AP) _ Law enforcement authorities in suburban Kansas City have identified a man detained by police after late-term abortion provider George Tiller was shot to death in a Wichita church.

Johnson County sheriff's spokesman Tom Erickson said Scott Roeder was the man whose car was stopped on Interstate 35 on Sunday, about three hours after the shooting. Earlier in the day, Wichita police said the suspect was a 51-year-old man from Merriam, Kan., but they refused to identify him by name.

Roeder has not been charged in the slaying, but he was expected to be taken to Wichita for questioning.

The 67-year-old Tiller was serving as an usher during morning services when he was shot in the foyer of Reformation Lutheran Church. Deputy Police Chief Tom Stolz said a gunman fired one shot at Tiller and threatened two other people who tried to stop him.

Wichita police have refused to identify the suspect, saying charges were expected Monday.

http://www.wibw.com/home/headlines/46580612.html

*********************************************************************

they have a suspect

scttrbrain's photo
Mon 06/01/09 03:37 PM

Kat...but what the doctor did was legal...regardless of whether people are pro-life or pro-choice. shooting the doctor was not legal

Jeeeeezusssss...I never said it wasn't rose. I do not think it was right to kill him as I do not believe it is right to kill a bay..inside or out. Legal or not it is wrong for either one to kill.
I can't for the life of me understand why it is okay to kill a baby by physician but not by boyfriend? Whats the diff? A baby dies. A potential boyfriend baby killer may die by lethal injection.

Kat

no photo
Mon 06/01/09 04:40 PM
killed him while his wife was singing in the choir. That's kinda sad

scttrbrain's photo
Mon 06/01/09 05:43 PM
Besides; terrorists strike everyday here in the good ole usa. Drive by's, home envasions, robberies, cop killers, lady killers....the list is loooong.

Will killing this man that killed this Dr., going to make it right? Is it an eye for an eye? Ironic, isn't it?

Kat

norslyman's photo
Mon 06/01/09 06:32 PM

The person who did the shooting is a domestic terrorist.


WRONG!!!!!!!!
He was an extremist who took his beliefs too far.

I wouldn't be surprised if he was an FBI asset just like Tim McVeigh because this is going to play right into the myth of the domestic terrorist - of which there are none - other than Government trained ones.

The fact that he's tied to the Freemen and that he was once pulled over with explosives in his trunk raises red flags for me.

Eric Rudolph was set up for the Olympic bombing. There is just too much of a track record for this stuff.

They are going to use this to further crack down on anybody remotely anti-government. Which is a bad term to use because we are really pro-righteous Government.

You are playing right into their hands. And to call for his death? Doesn't that show YOUR hypocrisy?

You are taking YOUR beliefs too far.


no photo
Mon 06/01/09 11:54 PM


The person who did the shooting is a domestic terrorist.


WRONG!!!!!!!!
He was an extremist who took his beliefs too far.

I wouldn't be surprised if he was an FBI asset just like Tim McVeigh because this is going to play right into the myth of the domestic terrorist - of which there are none - other than Government trained ones.

The fact that he's tied to the Freemen and that he was once pulled over with explosives in his trunk raises red flags for me.

Eric Rudolph was set up for the Olympic bombing. There is just too much of a track record for this stuff.

They are going to use this to further crack down on anybody remotely anti-government. Which is a bad term to use because we are really pro-righteous Government.

You are playing right into their hands. And to call for his death? Doesn't that show YOUR hypocrisy?

You are taking YOUR beliefs too far.




You keep talking about They all the time, who the heck is THEY?

adj4u's photo
Tue 06/02/09 06:39 AM
Edited by adj4u on Tue 06/02/09 06:45 AM
you would think it woul take more than just commiting a crime to be considered a terrorist


like there should at least be some conspiracy thrown in there somewhere with someone not involved in the actual committing of the criminal act during it commission

and be aimed at an undetermined target or group not a single designated target yes 9-11 was aim at wtc but they did not care who they killed thus the deaths of who cares who makes it a terrorist act

this was a mission to kill a specific person not indiscriminately kill or damage something


if you permit every thing to be called terrorism the door you are opening is a direct route to a military state

the patriot act permits the terrorist to be held in prolonged detention with no rights and no outside contact

so no this was murder not terrorism

tngxl65's photo
Tue 06/02/09 07:10 AM
This is a topic I generally won't touch. But this event has affected me personally.

First, without getting in to a debate about abortion, let me say a few things about Tiller. The man, believe it or not, was a kind man and not a hardened, heartless soul. He was a Catholic until the church kicked him out. He was not quick to provide the service he provided. He struggled greatly on the topic of late term abortion but realized that there are times when medically it is necessary and hospitals, which are often Catholic organization, don't want the heat that comes with it. He saved the life of a friend of mine that had a tubal pregnancy that would have killed her. And yes, he did, legally, perform early term abortions at the choice of the mother. It turns out it's legal. And he was determined to provide as safe and comfortable of a procedure as was medically possible. He provided counseling and offered up all the options that were available.

He was also very stubborn. The more he was threatened and attacked, the stronger he was about keeping his clinic open.

And the man that killed him? If it's the guy they are holding, then he's not a terrorist. He's a wacko in need of a cause and attention. A mental case. I wouldn't give him any more credit than that.


no photo
Tue 06/02/09 07:49 AM

you would think it woul take more than just commiting a crime to be considered a terrorist


like there should at least be some conspiracy thrown in there somewhere with someone not involved in the actual committing of the criminal act during it commission

and be aimed at an undetermined target or group not a single designated target yes 9-11 was aim at wtc but they did not care who they killed thus the deaths of who cares who makes it a terrorist act

this was a mission to kill a specific person not indiscriminately kill or damage something


if you permit every thing to be called terrorism the door you are opening is a direct route to a military state

the patriot act permits the terrorist to be held in prolonged detention with no rights and no outside contact

so no this was murder not terrorism


Hi Adj,

With all due respect, I think a person on a specific mission to kill a doctor tied to the abortion issue is a terrorist act? In my not so humble opinion it should be. Tell me that these acts against abortion clinics and doctors aren't terrorizing the communities in which they exist? So then how can he not be considered a terrorist.

no photo
Tue 06/02/09 07:51 AM
all semantics

arguing over the definitions of the motives of the killer doesn't diminish the deed