Topic: Is this what America does? | |
---|---|
I say let's lock up Thomas3474 for six years in a concrete and wire cage without charges or access to representation then see what happens.
Who is the "they"? |
|
|
|
Many times America has held POWs in the US!
Prisoners Of War In The United States During World War II Immediately after the outbreak of World War II the United States planned for the internment of enemy alien civilians. As early as December 9, 1941, preparations were started for the construction of a permanent alien enemy camp on the Florence Military Reservation in Arizona. While work was proceeding on this camp, ten emergency camps were established on Army posts strategically located on each coast and land frontier of the United States. In January, 1942, two additional three thousand-man camps were authorized. In an effort to move many of the alien enemy civilians from California, the Provost Marshal General and the Quartermaster General selected sites for additional camps in the Southwest, authorized the construction of nine other permanent alien camps, and planned for fourteen more alien camps.[1] By December, 1942, there were only about four thousand enemy aliens interned in the United States instead of the March prediction of one hundred thousand. As a result of this miscalculation numerous camps under construction were later converted to prisoner-of-war camps.[2] Early in 1942, the War Department directed the transfer of all captured enemy personnel to the United States in an effort to relieve overseas forces from the problems of guarding, feeding, and housing prisoners of war. However, very few prisoners were captured by United States forces in 1942, and by December 31 of that year only 1,881 prisoners had been interned in the United States.[3] In August, 1942, Great Britain proposed the transfer of one hundred and fifty thousand British-captured prisoners of war to the United States. At that time Great Britain held twenty-three thousand German and two hundred and fifty thousand Italian prisoners and believed that wholesale captures would strain facilities in their country; therefore, Britain suggested that the United States intern fifty thousand of these prisoners on one month’s notice and the other one hundred thousand on three months’ notice. The United States Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff Planners agreed to accept the one hundred and fifty thousand prisoners of war with the understanding that the War Department would be given one month’s notice before the acceptance of the first shipment of fifty thousand and one month’s notice for each consignment thereafter.[4] This decision to accept prisoners of war in the continental United States changed the activity of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from enemy alien civilians to the internment of prisoners of war. Plans were thus initiated for the necessary construction of prisoner-of-war camps. http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~txrober2/TissingI.htm |
|
|
|
If they are not guilty of a prosecutable crime and we hold them, we should be charged with war crimes. We should not be allowed to be inhumane regardless to our prejudices.
|
|
|
|
If country A gets attacked by a beligerent group or individual from country B, and Country A attacks country B for not doing anything to prevent the said attack, then it is by no means an unjustifiable war by Country A on the basis of the individual or group not being ordered by its own host country.
|
|
|
|
If country A gets attacked by a beligerent group or individual from country B, and Country A attacks country B for not doing anything to prevent the said attack, then it is by no means an unjustifiable war by Country A on the basis of the individual or group not being ordered by its own host country. Since Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, I know you are not refering to us. So who are you talking about? |
|
|
|
If country A gets attacked by a beligerent group or individual from country B, and Country A attacks country B for not doing anything to prevent the said attack, then it is by no means an unjustifiable war by Country A on the basis of the individual or group not being ordered by its own host country. Since Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11, I know you are not refering to us. So who are you talking about? |
|
|
|
Our forthcoming attack on Saudi Arabia, where 16 of the 19 came from, of course
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Thoughtfulthug
on
Mon 05/25/09 01:37 PM
|
|
Our forthcoming attack on Saudi Arabia, where 16 of the 19 came from, of course |
|
|
|
Edited by
Fanta46
on
Mon 05/25/09 01:43 PM
|
|
If they are not guilty of a prosecutable crime and we hold them, we should be charged with war crimes. We should not be allowed to be inhumane regardless to our prejudices. If they are POWs we have every right to hold them, without trial, for as long as we are at war! It would be derelict and irrational to release them before then! |
|
|
|
If they are not guilty of a prosecutable crime and we hold them, we should be charged with war crimes. We should not be allowed to be inhumane regardless to our prejudices. If they are POWs we have every right to hold them, without trial, for as long as we are at war! It would be derelict and irrational to release them before then! POWs should still not be tortured. We should not mistreat them even if we have to hold them because of laws of war. War is a sick business anyway. |
|
|
|
If they are not guilty of a prosecutable crime and we hold them, we should be charged with war crimes. We should not be allowed to be inhumane regardless to our prejudices. If they are POWs we have every right to hold them, without trial, for as long as we are at war! It would be derelict and irrational to release them before then! POWs should still not be tortured. We should not mistreat them even if we have to hold them because of laws of war. War is a sick business anyway. I agree! We should never torture them! Its criminal and all involved should be tried. Bush, Cheney, and Rummy blurred so many lines. It will take a momentous effort to sort out those taken as POWs, those guilty of terrorism crimes, and those turned in just for profit by their neighbors! Obama has his work cut out for him that's for sure! The Bush Administrations policies did more harm to this country than most Americans can comprehend! |
|
|
|
The Bush Administrations policies did more harm to this country than most Americans can comprehend! |
|
|
|
The Bush Administrations policies did more harm to this country than most Americans can comprehend! Oh but we can! All one must do is have a little age and the abiliy to see what is happening now! |
|
|
|
Terrrorist are not being treated inhumanely at gitmo, they have better medical care, food, clothing and a roof over their heads than some americans have. They are not under our civil criminal code. They get far better than they deserve. Our own troops, special ops, have been water boarded, Survival, evasion, escape and resistance (SEER) training can get just as rough as any thing the poor little ragheads have to endure. The only mistake I see was bringing them there in the first place, should have shot their @ss where they were found
|
|
|
|
If they are not guilty of a prosecutable crime and we hold them, we should be charged with war crimes. We should not be allowed to be inhumane regardless to our prejudices. If they are POWs we have every right to hold them, without trial, for as long as we are at war! It would be derelict and irrational to release them before then! POWs should still not be tortured. We should not mistreat them even if we have to hold them because of laws of war. War is a sick business anyway. They are not enduring anything worse than what they deliver, remember, they chop off heads and display bodies |
|
|
|
wah, wah, wah, let's just blame it all on Bush, I guess Gore or Kerry would have did a better joby
|
|
|
|
If your not a Vet, you don't really have a clue about anything going on concerning war, prisoners, gitmo or any of it, must watch and get your info on cnn or msnbc
|
|
|
|
oh those poor poor terrorist
|
|
|
|
Concurring the Japanese who were rounded up and sent to concentration camps. I’ve read that the supreme court ruled agents the Japanese. May God have Mersey on my sole for defending F. D. R’s New Deal but I believe he did the right thing.
|
|
|
|
There is no law protecting this people. In the Gulf war two, when we captured an Iraqi solder in uniform he had al kinds of laws protecting him but these people don’t.
|
|
|