Previous 1
Topic: Misconception
no photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:33 PM
Why is it that people think that because two people consent to having sex together that it means they both want a baby?


Scenario.


Girl and Guy both agree to have sex. Girl and Guy both agree they don't want a baby. Especially with each other. 2 months later, girl finds out she's pregnant. She changes her mind about having a baby. Doesn't even consult the dad for what he thinks. Forces the guy to be the dad. She has society on her side. She says that it takes two to make a baby and that he has to man up to taking care of the baby.

Girl gets away with lying and decieving, while the honest guy gets shat upon.

What the solution should be: Mutual consent. If the mom wants to keep the baby, and the father doesn't, then she must inherit ALL the responsibility for her decision. The man should have that right.




JustAGuy2112's photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:44 PM
Edited by JustAGuy2112 on Wed 05/13/09 11:44 PM
Oh that's a brilliant idea. Then you can have guys going around saying they don't want kids and impregnating women with complete impunity. You would suddenly have a whole lot of " honest " men saying that they told the girl " all along " that they didn't want any kids.

For cryin out loud man. Men ( for the most part ) don't think when it comes to sex anyway. There is quite enough of the deadbeat dad syndrome around these days as it is.


no photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:44 PM
I got it on with a chick in the back of my van and her tubes were tied....no worries..

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:47 PM
Once again seems a bit "general" to me.. People think? Why don't some people think? some think too much and others not at all.. I'd gander to say that over 50% don't think they'll get pregnant at all man or woman... Surely not something I'd expect from a genius... huh

no photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:48 PM

Oh that's a brilliant idea. Then you can have guys going around saying they don't want kids and impregnating women with complete impunity. You would suddenly have a whole lot of " honest " men saying that they told the girl " all along " that they didn't want any kids.

For cryin out loud man. Men ( for the most part ) don't think when it comes to sex anyway. There is quite enough of the deadbeat dad syndrome around these days as it is.





It's not that they're deadbeat dads. They just don't want the kid. Plain and simple.

JustAGuy2112's photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:51 PM


Oh that's a brilliant idea. Then you can have guys going around saying they don't want kids and impregnating women with complete impunity. You would suddenly have a whole lot of " honest " men saying that they told the girl " all along " that they didn't want any kids.

For cryin out loud man. Men ( for the most part ) don't think when it comes to sex anyway. There is quite enough of the deadbeat dad syndrome around these days as it is.





It's not that they're deadbeat dads. They just don't want the kid. Plain and simple.


Then they should have been more careful or kept it in their pants.

Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.

There are plenty of single mothers out there, whose men left them because they " didn't want children ".

Should those dudes just get to wash their hands of the whole thing and just walk away??

no photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:53 PM
Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.



Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them.

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:53 PM



Oh that's a brilliant idea. Then you can have guys going around saying they don't want kids and impregnating women with complete impunity. You would suddenly have a whole lot of " honest " men saying that they told the girl " all along " that they didn't want any kids.

For cryin out loud man. Men ( for the most part ) don't think when it comes to sex anyway. There is quite enough of the deadbeat dad syndrome around these days as it is.





It's not that they're deadbeat dads. They just don't want the kid. Plain and simple.


Then they should have been more careful or kept it in their pants.

Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.

There are plenty of single mothers out there, whose men left them because they " didn't want children ".

Should those dudes just get to wash their hands of the whole thing and just walk away??


Guy you have to consider all sources...

JustAGuy2112's photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:54 PM

Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.



Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them.


Dude. You cannot be serious.

You want the woman to have basically two choices?? Abortion or raising the kid alone???

Get a grip.

JustAGuy2112's photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:54 PM




Oh that's a brilliant idea. Then you can have guys going around saying they don't want kids and impregnating women with complete impunity. You would suddenly have a whole lot of " honest " men saying that they told the girl " all along " that they didn't want any kids.

For cryin out loud man. Men ( for the most part ) don't think when it comes to sex anyway. There is quite enough of the deadbeat dad syndrome around these days as it is.





It's not that they're deadbeat dads. They just don't want the kid. Plain and simple.


Then they should have been more careful or kept it in their pants.

Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.

There are plenty of single mothers out there, whose men left them because they " didn't want children ".

Should those dudes just get to wash their hands of the whole thing and just walk away??


Guy you have to consider all sources...


IP, I am totally considering the source on this one.

no photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:55 PM


Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.



Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them.


Dude. You cannot be serious.

You want the woman to have basically two choices?? Abortion or raising the kid alone???

Get a grip.



Is it that hard to comprehend?

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:57 PM

Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.



Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them.



Are you kidding? You don't have kids what the heck do you know about it? Have you fathered any children? You have no idea the multiple circumstances that go into the situations that you are mentioning...

IndnPrncs's photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:58 PM





Oh that's a brilliant idea. Then you can have guys going around saying they don't want kids and impregnating women with complete impunity. You would suddenly have a whole lot of " honest " men saying that they told the girl " all along " that they didn't want any kids.

For cryin out loud man. Men ( for the most part ) don't think when it comes to sex anyway. There is quite enough of the deadbeat dad syndrome around these days as it is.





It's not that they're deadbeat dads. They just don't want the kid. Plain and simple.


Then they should have been more careful or kept it in their pants.

Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.

There are plenty of single mothers out there, whose men left them because they " didn't want children ".

Should those dudes just get to wash their hands of the whole thing and just walk away??


Guy you have to consider all sources...


IP, I am totally considering the source on this one.


Yeah, whenever someone brags about what they have, be it big appendage, beauty or brains, of course something is always lacking...

no photo
Wed 05/13/09 11:58 PM


Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.



Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them.



Are you kidding? You don't have kids what the heck do you know about it? Have you fathered any children? You have no idea the multiple circumstances that go into the situations that you are mentioning...




No. Yes, I do. Yes. Yes I do.

JustAGuy2112's photo
Thu 05/14/09 12:00 AM



Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.



Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them.


Dude. You cannot be serious.

You want the woman to have basically two choices?? Abortion or raising the kid alone???

Get a grip.



Is it that hard to comprehend?


No. It's not hard to comprehend at all. Your flawed logic just has me completely stunned.

IndnPrncs's photo
Thu 05/14/09 12:01 AM



Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.



Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them.



Are you kidding? You don't have kids what the heck do you know about it? Have you fathered any children? You have no idea the multiple circumstances that go into the situations that you are mentioning...




No. Yes, I do. Yes. Yes I do.



Well then I'm very surprised.. Of course along with the basic negativity of those that don't take responsibility, I guess I'm not that surprised...

no photo
Thu 05/14/09 12:01 AM
Tell me where the flaw is. There is no flaw. It's too simple.



By the way, Don't forget! There's always adoption if you're against abortion!

JustAGuy2112's photo
Thu 05/14/09 12:01 AM






Oh that's a brilliant idea. Then you can have guys going around saying they don't want kids and impregnating women with complete impunity. You would suddenly have a whole lot of " honest " men saying that they told the girl " all along " that they didn't want any kids.

For cryin out loud man. Men ( for the most part ) don't think when it comes to sex anyway. There is quite enough of the deadbeat dad syndrome around these days as it is.





It's not that they're deadbeat dads. They just don't want the kid. Plain and simple.


Then they should have been more careful or kept it in their pants.

Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.

There are plenty of single mothers out there, whose men left them because they " didn't want children ".

Should those dudes just get to wash their hands of the whole thing and just walk away??


Guy you have to consider all sources...


IP, I am totally considering the source on this one.


Yeah, whenever someone brags about what they have, be it big appendage, beauty or brains, of course something is always lacking...


Funny how the more they point it out, the less it shows.

no photo
Thu 05/14/09 12:02 AM




Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.



Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them.



Are you kidding? You don't have kids what the heck do you know about it? Have you fathered any children? You have no idea the multiple circumstances that go into the situations that you are mentioning...




No. Yes, I do. Yes. Yes I do.



Well then I'm very surprised.. Of course along with the basic negativity of those that don't take responsibility, I guess I'm not that surprised...




The responsible thing for a nonresponsible person is to not have a baby to be responsible of.

IndnPrncs's photo
Thu 05/14/09 12:02 AM

Tell me where the flaw is. There is no flaw. It's too simple.



By the way, Don't forget! There's always adoption if you're against abortion!


How about YOU AND YOUR FLAWED MALE COUNTERPARTS keep it in their pants until they're grown up enough to accept responsibility???? TOO EASY ISN'T IT???

Previous 1