100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Misconception | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.
Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them. Are you kidding? You don't have kids what the heck do you know about it? Have you fathered any children? You have no idea the multiple circumstances that go into the situations that you are mentioning... No. Yes, I do. Yes. Yes I do. Well then I'm very surprised.. Of course along with the basic negativity of those that don't take responsibility, I guess I'm not that surprised... The responsible thing for a nonresponsible person is to not have a baby to be responsible of. Yes and please tell me your experience that leads you to the knowledge you're sharing??? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell me where the flaw is. There is no flaw. It's too simple. By the way, Don't forget! There's always adoption if you're against abortion! The basic flaw in your logic is that the male in the deal should be allowed to have absolutely no responsibility. Adoption is fine, if she doesn't want the baby either. But if she does, then there has to be some kind of responsibility placed on the man who had a big part in creating that baby. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.
Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them. Are you kidding? You don't have kids what the heck do you know about it? Have you fathered any children? You have no idea the multiple circumstances that go into the situations that you are mentioning... No. Yes, I do. Yes. Yes I do. Well then I'm very surprised.. Of course along with the basic negativity of those that don't take responsibility, I guess I'm not that surprised... The responsible thing for a nonresponsible person is to not have a baby to be responsible of. Then that " non responsible " person should damn well keep their pants up. Being irresponsible and having no consequences is definitely not the way to go. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accidents happen. It is, or at least would be, completely and utterly unfair for one person to be held 100% responsible for something that needed two people to pull off.
Exactly my point. If you don't have both parents behind the baby, you shouldn't have the baby. Else, if one parent wants to take on the responsibility themselves, more power to them. Are you kidding? You don't have kids what the heck do you know about it? Have you fathered any children? You have no idea the multiple circumstances that go into the situations that you are mentioning... No. Yes, I do. Yes. Yes I do. Well then I'm very surprised.. Of course along with the basic negativity of those that don't take responsibility, I guess I'm not that surprised... The responsible thing for a nonresponsible person is to not have a baby to be responsible of. Yes and please tell me your experience that leads you to the knowledge you're sharing??? Doesn't sound like a whole lot of knowledge to me. Sounds more like someone who did something irresponsible and is now tired of taking care of the result of his irresponsibility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell me where the flaw is. There is no flaw. It's too simple. By the way, Don't forget! There's always adoption if you're against abortion! The basic flaw in your logic is that the male in the deal should be allowed to have absolutely no responsibility. Adoption is fine, if she doesn't want the baby either. But if she does, then there has to be some kind of responsibility placed on the man who had a big part in creating that baby. There doesn't have to be. I'm not sure why you believe there has to be. It is possible for there not to be. In fact, there are countless single mothers on this site that can tell you they can handle it on their own. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell me where the flaw is. There is no flaw. It's too simple. By the way, Don't forget! There's always adoption if you're against abortion! The basic flaw in your logic is that the male in the deal should be allowed to have absolutely no responsibility. Adoption is fine, if she doesn't want the baby either. But if she does, then there has to be some kind of responsibility placed on the man who had a big part in creating that baby. There doesn't have to be. I'm not sure why you believe there has to be. It is possible for there not to be. In fact, there are countless single mothers on this site that can tell you they can handle it on their own. You're so right there are.. me being one of them.. STILL you haven't answered where the MALE takes on any responsibility... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell me where the flaw is. There is no flaw. It's too simple. By the way, Don't forget! There's always adoption if you're against abortion! The basic flaw in your logic is that the male in the deal should be allowed to have absolutely no responsibility. Adoption is fine, if she doesn't want the baby either. But if she does, then there has to be some kind of responsibility placed on the man who had a big part in creating that baby. There doesn't have to be. I'm not sure why you believe there has to be. It is possible for there not to be. In fact, there are countless single mothers on this site that can tell you they can handle it on their own. In most cases, they were not left with much choice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell me where the flaw is. There is no flaw. It's too simple. By the way, Don't forget! There's always adoption if you're against abortion! The basic flaw in your logic is that the male in the deal should be allowed to have absolutely no responsibility. Adoption is fine, if she doesn't want the baby either. But if she does, then there has to be some kind of responsibility placed on the man who had a big part in creating that baby. There doesn't have to be. I'm not sure why you believe there has to be. It is possible for there not to be. In fact, there are countless single mothers on this site that can tell you they can handle it on their own. In most cases, they were not left with much choice. Gasp...You mean like how the father is not left with much choice when a girl makes him be the father of an unwanted baby? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell me where the flaw is. There is no flaw. It's too simple. By the way, Don't forget! There's always adoption if you're against abortion! The basic flaw in your logic is that the male in the deal should be allowed to have absolutely no responsibility. Adoption is fine, if she doesn't want the baby either. But if she does, then there has to be some kind of responsibility placed on the man who had a big part in creating that baby. There doesn't have to be. I'm not sure why you believe there has to be. It is possible for there not to be. In fact, there are countless single mothers on this site that can tell you they can handle it on their own. You're so right there are.. me being one of them.. STILL you haven't answered where the MALE takes on any responsibility... And he WONT answer because he believes the male should have no responsibility whatsoever as long as he says he doesn't want kids. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See, I should get more credit for my constant attempts at impotence...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell me where the flaw is. There is no flaw. It's too simple. By the way, Don't forget! There's always adoption if you're against abortion! The basic flaw in your logic is that the male in the deal should be allowed to have absolutely no responsibility. Adoption is fine, if she doesn't want the baby either. But if she does, then there has to be some kind of responsibility placed on the man who had a big part in creating that baby. There doesn't have to be. I'm not sure why you believe there has to be. It is possible for there not to be. In fact, there are countless single mothers on this site that can tell you they can handle it on their own. In most cases, they were not left with much choice. Gasp...You mean like how the father is not left with much choice when a girl makes him be the father of an unwanted baby? Did she put a gun to his head to MAKE him do what resulted in the child in the first place??? Did he put a gun to HER head??? It was, in the vast majority of cases, a consenting decision by both parties knowing full well what the result could be. To remove the responsibility, after the fact, from one of the parties is simply ridiculous. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell me where the flaw is. There is no flaw. It's too simple. By the way, Don't forget! There's always adoption if you're against abortion! The basic flaw in your logic is that the male in the deal should be allowed to have absolutely no responsibility. Adoption is fine, if she doesn't want the baby either. But if she does, then there has to be some kind of responsibility placed on the man who had a big part in creating that baby. There doesn't have to be. I'm not sure why you believe there has to be. It is possible for there not to be. In fact, there are countless single mothers on this site that can tell you they can handle it on their own. You're so right there are.. me being one of them.. STILL you haven't answered where the MALE takes on any responsibility... The MALE'S responsibility is to wear protection or not to have sex at all. After that fails, the next step is to not have the baby OR have the baby. If the man were pregnant, I'm sure he would have an abortion or adoption. Unfortunately, men aren't the ones that get pregnant, therefore the ultimate responsibility falls in the lap of the mother. |
|
|
|
|
