No I'm not assuming he isnt working or doing anthing else. I simply stated that if he is saying that Geithner has a lot on his plate then why doesnt he staff him and take some of the things off his plate and delegate it to someone else.

i think you have a very good point

Chaos creates an environment of vulnerability among the masses. If the economy was strong, jobs secure, this administration wouldn't be able to push the bs they currently espouse. If you sit back and take a good look at what is really going on, its clear that they are propping up their friends, using smoke and mirrors to try to deflect attention from how incompetent and complicit they really are. How is it possible that your treasury dept forces changes to the stimulus bill, allowing AIG style bonuses, then you come out and say its unacceptable. Later, saying that you support your Treasury Secretary and all he is doing.

The budget director comes out and says they are going to cut the deficit in half. The CBO comes out with the numbers that say the deficit is going to stay above $1 trillion per year for the next 10 years. We have just under $11 trillion in national debt, and in the next 10 years we are going to double that. In 8 years of George Bush he ran $3.8 trillion in deficits. Obama is already at almost $1 trillion in 2 freaking months. This is the height of irresponsibility. It is shocking what is going on. Truly shocking.

Get off the hate Bush bandwagon he is gone.
This isnt about him. Its about our new president. And IMO delgateing to much and not steping up to the plate and being a leader!

Obama hasn't been on the job long. I'm giving him a chance. I gave Bush that same chance.

I know he hasnt been on the job long but he needs to give geithner help, and let him focus alone on the stimulas and take the rest away. Just letting him deal with all he has to will just lead to failure. When he himself says Geithner has a lot on his plate should he lighten his load? I mean trillions of dollars is a lot to deal with in of itself. Look at AIG "no one knew the bonus thing was in there? Give me a break somebody had to wright it!

Bush let the problem go so long no one wants to be associated with the mess.

Geithner didn't want the job. They can't get him any assistants because no one else wants the job either. Who would want that job?

brb

THANK YOU....i said the same thing to someone recently

Two kicks for my one.

Again off the hate Bush bandwagon.
Congress were the ones who told Fanny and Freddie to make toxic loans, not Bush.
If Geithner didnt want the job then why didnt he say NO?

That is not being on a "hate Bush bandwagon". Bush left a mess and there's no denying it.

I don't know why Geithner took the job.

Bush was the best thing since sliced bread!!!!! Now wasnt that a republican congress?

i think this has gone on longer than bush

the last 3 have been majority dem. Barney Frank has been in their pocket for years and was the main one stoping republicans from putting more regulation on fanny and freddie.

I dont care who left the mess. Its left. I care about how its going to get fixed and focusing on I inherited these problems doesnt solve anything. Bushs name shouldnt be brought up in any conversation on fixing the problem wether he caused them or not.

scapegoating doesn't solve problems