1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 Next
Topic: Obama - New Idea On Schools - What Is Your Opinion?
Delsoldamien's photo
Wed 03/11/09 10:44 AM
Obama's promise of changing our schools causes me to look at Chicago and see just how he changed them there. Are the schools in Chicago better off today then they were when he was influential in that area?? Did they promote the good teachers and get rid of the bad ones?? I haven't checked myself, but doubt that any of the urban, democrat controlled school systems have done anything over the last 20 years that have made attendance go up, graduation rates go up or kept kids in school at a higher rate. These are systems that the powerful unions control, and unless he can tame them, nothing is going to change our school systems. In Washington State, there have been programs that have tried keeping kids in school year around, and they have failed and stopped. Charter or voucher schools are the solution, but nobody; teachers, unions and politicians want to promote those schools since the union money can't control them. Obama just has to make you feel like he is doing something to be sucessful...remember like Clinton, he feels your pain, he understands your frustrations, he desires to make the changes but it takes more then that to make it happen..

Drivinmenutz's photo
Wed 03/11/09 02:03 PM



WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama on Tuesday embraced a new approach to education that would reward good teachers, remove limits on charter schools and lengthen both the school day and the school year.

What is your opinion on the longer days, and school year?

My opinion is: "There goes the vacation time"!frustrated


I think education is in no way the business of our federal government.

If we wanted the best schools for our children we would stop having our government subsidize them, and instead find a way to get schools competing withone another. Competition promotes excellence...

I say let the states have their own tax money, and let them find an affective system. Screw this "one size fits all" crap.


Driven,

The states already use their tax money for the schools. One problem with what you're saying is that each state has a different amount of money. Some have more and some have alot less.


States do and they don't. How the system works is you send your state taxes to the state, they send it to the IRS, which is Federal. Then, the IRS takes it and keeps it. Then, the state, gets permission for a certain allowence provided to them by loans the Federal Government takes from the Federal Reserve Bank, or, lately, China's central bank. This is how the system works.

Problem with this, is the states don't get proper funding for schools UNLESS they meet standards set by the Department of Education. This i fully believe is our problem.

Number one, states deserve their own money, and shouldn't have to turn to the Federal Government to recieve their money. Number two you take away efficiency when centralizing something. When something is centralized there is little room to expand and grow.

If, however, you could somehow get some competition going, you could inspire natural growth.

Ever wonder why Private schools are the most successful in our country?

Ever wonder why we had the number 1 educational system in the world UNTIL the department of education was created in 1977? We are now number 12 the last i heard...

Winx's photo
Wed 03/11/09 02:05 PM
Charter schools can turn students away for what ever reason the want -low test scores, behavioral issues, or whatever. That's something to think about when looking at their scores.

There are 3 Charter schools in St. Louis. They are pretty new. They're not impressive, IMO. My child's friend, on our street, goes to one of the charter schools. The child is one grade ahead of my child. My child's education is a grade ahead of the friends.

Drivinmenutz's photo
Fri 03/13/09 09:58 AM

Charter schools can turn students away for what ever reason the want -low test scores, behavioral issues, or whatever. That's something to think about when looking at their scores.

There are 3 Charter schools in St. Louis. They are pretty new. They're not impressive, IMO. My child's friend, on our street, goes to one of the charter schools. The child is one grade ahead of my child. My child's education is a grade ahead of the friends.


Yeah, i get what you are saying. Sometimes they don't fit the bill. Sometimes they are discrimminatory.

We had a new highschool spring up in my local town. I was actually pulled out of the highschool i had been attending for two years and put into this new one. Had a big budget too. SOmething like $17 million for atotal population of like 800 students (when you included the 7th and 8th grade middle school attachment). They had the latest computers, $7,000 video cameras for the video class, a new, enthusiastic staff, etc.

I went there for a semester and got myself transfered back to my original highschool. Problem was, i fell behind the curve. my algebra two class at the new highschool put be behind by 7 chapters. I was also behind in biology, spanish, and a handful of other classes. Catching up was horrible. Almost failed...

New schools tend not to be successful. They seem to try too many "new" ideas and forget about reading, writing and arithmatic.

We have two local private schools, they are well known, and produce high quality educations. Infact, my best friend, the only one i knew that went to one of these schools, is a pharmacist today.

Obviously this is all personal experience, and stories. I still need to do some researching to support my assumption that private schools tend to provide higher quality education.

But, maybe that high quality is the result of them turning down anyone that would hold them back? Not sure...

no photo
Fri 03/13/09 07:31 PM
One of the biggest problems with charter schools in Michigan is the need for approval from an existing public school or college.

If we had a voucher system that would allow private companies to aggressively go after profits by providing the best possible education with the money available.

Even with these problem charter schools in Michigan are generally more successful than public schools. Just about the only public schools that compete with charter schools for educational quality are the ones in wealthy communities.

Although there are a few charter schools that do not do a good job, they do not survive long, since parents prefer to send their kids to the best possible school.

Winx's photo
Fri 03/13/09 07:49 PM


Charter schools can turn students away for what ever reason the want -low test scores, behavioral issues, or whatever. That's something to think about when looking at their scores.

There are 3 Charter schools in St. Louis. They are pretty new. They're not impressive, IMO. My child's friend, on our street, goes to one of the charter schools. The child is one grade ahead of my child. My child's education is a grade ahead of the friends.


Yeah, i get what you are saying. Sometimes they don't fit the bill. Sometimes they are discrimminatory.

We had a new highschool spring up in my local town. I was actually pulled out of the highschool i had been attending for two years and put into this new one. Had a big budget too. SOmething like $17 million for atotal population of like 800 students (when you included the 7th and 8th grade middle school attachment). They had the latest computers, $7,000 video cameras for the video class, a new, enthusiastic staff, etc.

I went there for a semester and got myself transfered back to my original highschool. Problem was, i fell behind the curve. my algebra two class at the new highschool put be behind by 7 chapters. I was also behind in biology, spanish, and a handful of other classes. Catching up was horrible. Almost failed...

New schools tend not to be successful. They seem to try too many "new" ideas and forget about reading, writing and arithmatic.

We have two local private schools, they are well known, and produce high quality educations. Infact, my best friend, the only one i knew that went to one of these schools, is a pharmacist today.

Obviously this is all personal experience, and stories. I still need to do some researching to support my assumption that private schools tend to provide higher quality education.

But, maybe that high quality is the result of them turning down anyone that would hold them back? Not sure...


Driven,

I went to three public high schools. I do know what you're talking about.

I do believe that my child is getting a better education at their private school. I've compared. But..the only reason I sent my child to a private school is because our public schools lost their accreditation.

I've noticed that the private school is harder then the public school yet the kids at the private school get better grades.

no photo
Fri 03/13/09 08:10 PM
I will put a smile between your statement and my answer, then two smiles at the end of my answer.


Ok bare with me here.

Many of you are concerned about government involvement in schools, well the thing is I have never known it to be any other way, and I am almost 60 years old. Why is it such a feared thing all of a sudden?
:smile:
I am 35, I went to a very good public high school, and I have been fighting against the public school monopoly since I was 17. The reason why is because those aunts and uncles that were not factory workers or construction workers were teachers. Including one uncle who chose to teach in the Detroit school system for the challenge of it. The public school systems in big cities are almost always a disaster, and our nation's youth deserve better.
:smile: :smile:

You guys also say you are concerned about finances and the cost of education so why are we making things so complicated with private, charter etc. I don't understand why we would have to have so many options for parents to deal with. Dont we want a society where people learn to live together in some sort of harmony?
:smile:
Private schools do not receive much tax support. They generally provide the best education, with some operating at much lower cost than a public school, or even a charter school.

Charter Schools are a hybrid between public schools and private (not religious) schools. Here in Michigan a Charter school receives a little more than half as much money per student as a public school. The difference between what the State (tax payers) give to charter schools and public schools goes to public schools to help offset the lost 'revenue' from the child attending a charter school. Charter schools tend to have medium quality education, being better than many public schools and nearly all big city schools. The state maintains significant control over the charter schools, including limiting the number of students who can attend a charter school. However, they do have a little more freedom than a public school.

Public schools are fully funded by the State, and heavily regulated by the State, as well as the NEA. Public school quality varies drastically by school, with big city schools have horrible educational quality. This results in poor inner city kids receiving a terrible education.

:smile: :smile:

Why not have public schools where the education is equal to a private school. It seems to me that it's not 'always' better to have more choices, it's more confusing and more difficult for parents and the kids, no? Not to mention unequal due to finances and geography.

:smile:
You are right, it is more confusing and difficult to have several schools to choose from. However, the public school monopoly in big cities has been an abject failure for decades, even though they get more funding per pupil. If the public schools were working, this would just be an academic discussion between libertarians, not an issue of growing importance and popularity with both democrats and republicans.
:smile: :smile:

Everyone is so worried about what their particular children are going to be exposed to. To me that is strange, because in the end these kids need to be aware of reality, it's no wonder we adults don't understand each other, we have all been separated by our own parents fears of this or that, so we grow up already disliking half of society.
:smile:
I agree that some students are being sheltered to much, but that is a tiny minority. The schools which are going to face the most competition from school vouchers are the big city schools where most of the kids families are poor or lower middle class. In schools like these, teachers are told to take self defense classes before their first day. Kids have to dodge and hide from gangs, even in the younger grades. Knives, guns, and drugs are a constant presence. More than half the students who enroll in kindergarten in the Detroit Public School system do not graduate from high school. Of those who do graduate, more than 20% are illiterate. This is a national disgrace.
:smile: :smile:

I went to both catholic school and public school, in 9th grade I was in public school twiddling my thumbs literally because I already knew the material. So yes catholic school was more advanced, but tell me why public school can't be as well. And why do these charter schools pull money away from public schools. Oh and what the heck is a charter school anyway?

When I was completely out of school and on my own I discovered what I did not learn in catholic school and frankly that bothered me, it's as if my parents did want me to learn certain things like things about science, so I would be completely unprepared for an adult conversation about such things. I sometimes think we are all at fault for the way society is today, paranoid and frankly a bit off our rockers in some ways.
:smile:
Every school, and every teacher has biases which affect the education of their students. There is just as much indoctrination in public schools as in private schools. It is just a different agenda being pushed.
:smile: :smile:

Everyone is so concerned about indoctrination but that can be said about private schools and heck you can be indoctrinated in your own home. I know I was.


I realize I am just a schmuck on the internet expressing an opinion. Even if you do not agree with my opinion, I hope you will consider the opinion of the parents. The last time Michigan had a State wide ballot initiative for school vouchers about 70% of black people living in Detroit voted in favor of school vouchers!

Just think about that for a few minutes. The parents of poor black kids in Detroit voted in favor of school vouchers by a 70% to 30% margin.

no photo
Fri 03/13/09 11:05 PM

I will put a smile between your statement and my answer, then two smiles at the end of my answer.


Ok bare with me here.

Many of you are concerned about government involvement in schools, well the thing is I have never known it to be any other way, and I am almost 60 years old. Why is it such a feared thing all of a sudden?
:smile:
I am 35, I went to a very good public high school, and I have been fighting against the public school monopoly since I was 17. The reason why is because those aunts and uncles that were not factory workers or construction workers were teachers. Including one uncle who chose to teach in the Detroit school system for the challenge of it. The public school systems in big cities are almost always a disaster, and our nation's youth deserve better.
:smile: :smile:

You guys also say you are concerned about finances and the cost of education so why are we making things so complicated with private, charter etc. I don't understand why we would have to have so many options for parents to deal with. Dont we want a society where people learn to live together in some sort of harmony?
:smile:
Private schools do not receive much tax support. They generally provide the best education, with some operating at much lower cost than a public school, or even a charter school.

Charter Schools are a hybrid between public schools and private (not religious) schools. Here in Michigan a Charter school receives a little more than half as much money per student as a public school. The difference between what the State (tax payers) give to charter schools and public schools goes to public schools to help offset the lost 'revenue' from the child attending a charter school. Charter schools tend to have medium quality education, being better than many public schools and nearly all big city schools. The state maintains significant control over the charter schools, including limiting the number of students who can attend a charter school. However, they do have a little more freedom than a public school.

Public schools are fully funded by the State, and heavily regulated by the State, as well as the NEA. Public school quality varies drastically by school, with big city schools have horrible educational quality. This results in poor inner city kids receiving a terrible education.

:smile: :smile:

Why not have public schools where the education is equal to a private school. It seems to me that it's not 'always' better to have more choices, it's more confusing and more difficult for parents and the kids, no? Not to mention unequal due to finances and geography.

:smile:
You are right, it is more confusing and difficult to have several schools to choose from. However, the public school monopoly in big cities has been an abject failure for decades, even though they get more funding per pupil. If the public schools were working, this would just be an academic discussion between libertarians, not an issue of growing importance and popularity with both democrats and republicans.
:smile: :smile:

Everyone is so worried about what their particular children are going to be exposed to. To me that is strange, because in the end these kids need to be aware of reality, it's no wonder we adults don't understand each other, we have all been separated by our own parents fears of this or that, so we grow up already disliking half of society.
:smile:
I agree that some students are being sheltered to much, but that is a tiny minority. The schools which are going to face the most competition from school vouchers are the big city schools where most of the kids families are poor or lower middle class. In schools like these, teachers are told to take self defense classes before their first day. Kids have to dodge and hide from gangs, even in the younger grades. Knives, guns, and drugs are a constant presence. More than half the students who enroll in kindergarten in the Detroit Public School system do not graduate from high school. Of those who do graduate, more than 20% are illiterate. This is a national disgrace.
:smile: :smile:

I went to both catholic school and public school, in 9th grade I was in public school twiddling my thumbs literally because I already knew the material. So yes catholic school was more advanced, but tell me why public school can't be as well. And why do these charter schools pull money away from public schools. Oh and what the heck is a charter school anyway?

When I was completely out of school and on my own I discovered what I did not learn in catholic school and frankly that bothered me, it's as if my parents did want me to learn certain things like things about science, so I would be completely unprepared for an adult conversation about such things. I sometimes think we are all at fault for the way society is today, paranoid and frankly a bit off our rockers in some ways.
:smile:
Every school, and every teacher has biases which affect the education of their students. There is just as much indoctrination in public schools as in private schools. It is just a different agenda being pushed.
:smile: :smile:

Everyone is so concerned about indoctrination but that can be said about private schools and heck you can be indoctrinated in your own home. I know I was.


I realize I am just a schmuck on the internet expressing an opinion. Even if you do not agree with my opinion, I hope you will consider the opinion of the parents. The last time Michigan had a State wide ballot initiative for school vouchers about 70% of black people living in Detroit voted in favor of school vouchers!

Just think about that for a few minutes. The parents of poor black kids in Detroit voted in favor of school vouchers by a 70% to 30% margin.


Thank you so much Melaschasm, especially for the time you took to explain. I have always wondered about charter schools and private and the difference.

It seems a horrible waste of money on public schools though, if they are such a disgrace. I have to say one thing about my catholic education is that we were there to study, not wonder what everyone is wearing etc. The problems in schools today seems that teachers have all this bull to contend with with students. I don't have the answers of course but I sure do empathize with what teachers have to deal with because parents aren't dealing with it for whatever reason.

Thank you again for the details...

cutelildevilsmom's photo
Sat 03/14/09 06:44 AM


In my son's case year round school would be way to much.He needs that break.I think 180 days of school is quite enough and 6 hr days also.


(((Cutemom)))happy waving


flowerforyou waving

cutelildevilsmom's photo
Sat 03/14/09 06:51 AM
Well boo2 in our day we respected our elders and if we disagreed we argued our point intelligently instead of cursing the teacher,parent etc out.Of course spanking wasn't taboo then.

no photo
Sat 03/14/09 07:51 AM
Edited by boo2u on Sat 03/14/09 07:53 AM

Well boo2 in our day we respected our elders and if we disagreed we argued our point intelligently instead of cursing the teacher,parent etc out.Of course spanking wasn't taboo then.



What? You got to argue your point? That was rare back then. :wink:

You didn't argue jack in the schools I went to, and this is one of the problems with my generation. Children are to be seen and not heard, so when the abuse came there was no where to go, not in public or Christian schools, and more especially in Christian schools were the girls are taught to obey and respect their elders leaving them open to sexual abuse at the hands of family and outsiders.

Girls were taught to be cute and obedient, so they often took abuse, verbal and otherwise, from brothers and fathers and uncles and sometimes women who also came from abuse.

So our generation is not to be aspired to though the church might love to drag us all back there. It really shouldn't be held up as an example.... that's for sure. The product of our views back then are teaching 'your' children now, that's a scary thought. Disclaimer: I don't mean all...

Respect is earned even for elders, no child should be taught to respect elders if they are not also taught that elders must respect the child.

Spanking , well that's another topic, and usually as heated as abortion. I am not for spanking, to me if you have to use violence to get a point across, you are just as out of control as the child. I was brought up on it, and had to deal with what I learned from it. For a long time I was terrified of being around kids, for fear I might lose control like that myself. My parents only taught me that anger was dealt with with more anger, if I said that right.

Anyway I am off topic I think so I better git...

Winx's photo
Sat 03/14/09 12:53 PM



In my son's case year round school would be way to much.He needs that break.I think 180 days of school is quite enough and 6 hr days also.


(((Cutemom)))happy waving


flowerforyou waving


I've missed you.happy flowerforyou

1 2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 Next