just remember hun...YOU are the one getting off topic and the rest of us are just following your lead lol

and what asset would that be?

After more than one dance around the forums with Bee who seems to regard himself as the ultimate informed person in all things political, social and economic I have learned to appreciate his posts for the amusing pieces they are.

After more than one post making reference to my cleavage and numerous veiled and not so veiled attempts to insult and belittle me I simply had to reply to this the section of his post posted here below with a grin. As I said I can appreciate how much he must of enjoyed writing it based on our previous interactions.

"Lynann is a lesbian pedophile who freqently engages in beastiality. She doesn't have a job. She's spent the last five years in prison for child molestation and shoplifting. She has frequent bouts with herpes and has genital warts. She hates men and anything of the male species (including a tattoo with an arrow pointing down saying "no men allowed" on her bikini line), so guys don't even bother e-mailing her."

Amusing? Sure in his own way but...

lol, i know he didn't mean anything bad with it. he's pretty cool

While there are times when I agree with Bee, he knows full well that he can enjoy being an arrogant $rick. Admit it Bee... I would have to ask why he would use that particular example for analogous purposes?

I can't imagine you thought it would get a significant rise out of Lynann. If you are so concerned with the education of the ignorant, why use that analogy?

Bee, I had no trouble understanding the purpose of Lynann's post, hardly needed the lecture, though I understand you couldn't help yourself.

Lyann...gulp !!!... ...shhhhhhhhhhhh

I can't believe what was said about Lynann.

That was out of line.

did i miss something?

I don't think Bee was calling her that...I think he was trying to prove a point...that being...that you can't always trust or believe anonymous sources...

Bee / Gio
2112

He wasn't calling her that. What he said, though, was just wrong!

she was ok with it, because she knew he was just joking. i know this because her and i were talking through email. so please everyone just calm down.

The liberal license Bee took with his example using my name came as no surprise to me.

Was I okay with it?

Okay might be the wrong word. Amused is more accurate as I think it and the post in general speaks volumes about it's author.

This forum in general is quite entertaining and Bee is one of the standouts.

DUH!!! No $hit Sherlock, the question is why he used that particular analogy.

Some times you men are very thick. Knowing Lynann, I never suspected she would be upset with it, but it does reflect the mind of the author to use that particular analogy of any he could have used. My question was why that one... It's just a question, no need for the calm down.....

who kicked your dog !!... ...I think his arrow was aimed at Lyann...because they've had an ongoing repartee...from Bee's very first post...

Love that expression by the way, but you don't want to kick my dog, if you want to keep your jewels.

And yes I remember when it all started between Bee and Lynann, didn't prevent me from being curious as to why he used that analogy though. Unless curiosity is not allowed in Mingle.

Now quit bugging me Gio, I haven't had my coffee yet, your in the danger zone....

Never.
If a Dr. says they can do the job and do it right then, he scerws up, he should be liable.