So you have no response..just as I figured, you cannot answer the questions because you cannot deny my information...these people are better off with our help..

Prove to me that villages were burned and innocent people were murdered as the media claims, and anti-war whackos claim...Have you seen it,do you have inside information...almost all those that were accused by our great senator Murtha we all found to be innocent of the charges..but I guess that means nothing to you.

50 million men and women held a purple thumb up after voting and getting the chance to voice their opinion for the first time in many years without the threat of violence and death.. no big deal I guess.

The Ugly Truth - The Ugly American
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20077.htm

BAGHDAD, Iraq --American soldiers took turns raping a 14-year-old Iraqi girl, and one of them put a bullet through her head after killing her parents and 5-year-old sister, an Army investigator testified Monday.

The attack followed a session of whiskey drinking and card-playing during which five soldiers plotted the March 12 assault, criminal investigator Benjamin Bierce said.

He cited details from a sworn statement by Spc. James P. Barker in which the soldier told how he and his comrades practiced hitting golf balls before heading to the Iraqi teen's home 250 yards from their post at a traffic checkpoint.

After the slayings, the soldiers returned to their post, where Barker grilled chicken wings, Bierce testified.

http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2006/08/07/medic_recounts_finding_iraqi_girls_body/

I will check it, but one incident is not an entire statement of burning down villages, killing and murdering people everywhere.. you still cannot answer the questions...

The military does not keep records of dead Iraqis but its estimated at over a million by amnesty international. Thats all for me for now happy googling

Another unfounded statement..it has been proven that this statement by amnesty international is false and even the radical left wing whackos and anti war protester admit that...facts baby not unfounded truths....

And you still didn't have the balls to answer my questions...wow

dude, you can't debate with him. he'll just keep pasting op eds and blogs until you get tired of it and go away

EDIT: and as soon as you start making headway he ALWAYS has something to go do

The number is shocking and sobering.

It is at least 10 times greater than most estimates cited in the US media, yet it is based on a scientific study of violent Iraqi deaths caused by the U.S.-led invasion of March 2003.

That study, published in prestigious medical journal The Lancet, estimated that over 600,000 Iraqis had been killed as a result of the invasion as of July 2006. Iraqis have continued to be killed since then. The graphic above provides a rough daily update of this number based on a rate of increase derived from the Iraq Body Count. (See the complete explanation.)

The estimate that over a million Iraqis have died received independent confirmation from a prestigious British polling agency in September 2007. Opinion Research Business estimated that 1.2 million Iraqis have been killed violently since the US-led invasion.

This devastating human toll demands greater recognition. It eclipses the Rwandan genocide and our leaders are directly responsible. Little wonder they do not publicly cite it. Here is simple HTML code to post the counter to your website and help spread the word.


http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/iraq/iraqdeaths.html

There is one major problem with all this debate.

That which was done to three high ranking terrorists was legal.

It may have been wrong and immoral, but it was technically legal.

Why exactly were we in vietnam again? talk about rambling off into another topic.... come on that war was also a war crime. It seems we have a history of attacking countries for little or no reasone. Me thinks some people watched to many Rambo movies



If memory serves me correctly we were in Vietnam because two democrat presidents thought that we needed to make a stand against communism. Or to be more specific, because JFK and LBJ sent our troops there.

If memory serves me correctly we were in Vietnam because two democrat presidents thought that we needed to make a stand against communism. Or to be more specific, because JFK and LBJ sent our troops there.


blame France

they started it

What happened to Afganistan. I just saw something of 30,000 troops to be deployed. Did we run these wars backwards and put our own men and woman in undue risks? Think about it! Lets start something then pull resourse out and stsart something else and then go back and finish what we started first? Does this make sence?

Not necessarily. I think most people would agree that the US was right to focus on Germany after Japan attacked us in WW2.

Iraq was no Germany. Dam we walked right into Baghdad. No comparison at all..Dont you remember the first gulf war?

it was really hot

I was in the Persion Gulf from 1979 to 1985. Iraq had no navy. come on!!

A 800 lb gorilla attacking a 90lb weakling! Did we not just walk right into Baghdad? And left all those arm caches unattended to come back later and bite us in the azz.

and almost their whole airforce fled to Iran

And we put 3 carriers in the gulf!!!! Does anyone understand that power! 1 carrier had more air power than all of Iraq did in the first war! You still want to compare Germany?

Why all the silence? Seems to have gottin that way in some other threads!