100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: do you ever... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
(((DD))) all the time....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E, you're always welcome in my threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E, you're always welcome in my threads Ohhhh...don't mind if I do 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Umm excuse ME but you're not talking about ME again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty new here too, but already have found a few posters that I don't run to as fast to check out. But even if you don't like the OP or any poster, there are always still cool people here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it would be interesting if we could rate each others posts and if users below a certain rating were not allowed to post for a certain amount of time. But who would be the ones doing the rating?? I don't think there is any way you could find enough impartial people to make it a fair assessment of the worthiness of people's posts. we would rate other users. Say anyone with at least 500 posts. And maybe...on a 1-10 scale. And...you can only vote 1 five times per week. ((((Indn)))) how ya be chickadee? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Umm excuse ME but you're not talking about ME again... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm good sweets...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open a thread, read through the responses, see a post from someone you're not fond of and decide to avoid the thread altogether just because they've posted? Nope!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
ChefBadger
on
Wed 11/19/08 09:19 PM
|
|
<-- 10
I get 500 emails an hour because Im hot. edit: (and you're desperate) ME ME ME ME ME ME ME... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<-- 10 I get 500 emails an hour because Im hot. ME ME ME ME ME ME ME... faker! he's actually sipping grape juice. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRB gotta go email Chef
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it would be interesting if we could rate each others posts and if users below a certain rating were not allowed to post for a certain amount of time. But who would be the ones doing the rating?? I don't think there is any way you could find enough impartial people to make it a fair assessment of the worthiness of people's posts. we would rate other users. Say anyone with at least 500 posts. And maybe...on a 1-10 scale. And...you can only vote 1 five times per week. Still wouldn't work IMO. Too many people with too many friends who would rate a post at a 10 even if it was something completely inane. Or if that particular post was berating someone else, then it would be nothing more than a popularity contest. If you have enough friends ( are popular enough ) then no matter how many 1 ratings you got, there would be enough 10's to outweigh it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open a thread, read through the responses, see a post from someone you're not fond of and decide to avoid the thread altogether just because they've posted? Nope. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRB gotta go email Chef Post of the day right there! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no
can't give anyone that kind of power |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open a thread, read through the responses, see a post from someone you're not fond of and decide to avoid the thread altogether just because they've posted? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
open a thread, read through the responses, see a post from someone you're not fond of and decide to avoid the thread altogether just because they've posted? YES I knew it. you hate me.  noway
|
|
|
|
|
