come on now if bush had his wish list and no one stood in his way and cheer lead for him and worshiped him we would allready be at war in Iran. The fact is there was enough out cry over Iraq to make those nutty neo cons stop and think for a minute, in fact they even wanted to dress up Navy seals as iranian sailors and attack US ships to make the war more exceptable to the public, if that isnt nazi thinking I dont know what is.

Lol, your assumptions and logic amuses me.

Fact, they did have a brain storming session to come up with an excuse to attack Iran, fact they discussed dressing navy seals as Iranians and attacking US shipping. So whats the problem? What kind of loony government looks for excuses to wage a war?

Fact, using a statement of fact, such as what you just did, does not mean something is true, it merely means it can be proven true or false. It is a common tool of politicians to try to confuse voters. Way to support their tactics.

Stop your nutty republican fox news spin job. The man who brought this to light has a ton of credability. Its not like it was some crack head mumbling on the street about these plans to use Navy seals to stage a false flag operation and if you havent noticed it hasnt been denied by Cheney. Here is the story .............................. all those scoffing at the headline, Seymour Hersh is no lightweight. After exposing the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam conflict in 1969 he received the 1970 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting. He also wrote reports in 2004 regarding the mistreatment of detainees at Abu Ghraib prison which gained much recognition.

The fact that we’re hearing these kind of stories coming from reputable reporters like Hersh and not just the likes of Alex Jones, should be a wake up call to moderates who find it hard to believe that such clandestine and repugnant operations actually occur.

Speaking at the Campus Progress journalism conference earlier this month, Seymour Hersh - a Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist for The New Yorker - revealed that Bush administration officials held a meeting recently in the Vice President's office to discuss ways to provoke a war with Iran.

In Hersh's most recent article, he reports that this meeting occurred in the wake of the overblown incident in the Strait of Hormuz, when a U.S. carrier almost shot at a few small Iranian speedboats. The "meeting took place in the Vice-President's office. 'The subject was how to create a casus belli between Tehran and Washington,'" according to one of Hersh's sources.

During the journalism conference event, I asked Hersh specifically about this meeting and if he could elaborate on what occurred. Hersh explained that, during the meeting in Cheney's office, an idea was considered to dress up Navy Seals as Iranians, put them on fake Iranian speedboats, and shoot at them. This idea, intended to provoke an Iran war, was ultimately rejected:
http://current.com/items/89178696_cheney_considered_proposal_to_dress_up_navy_seals_as_iranians_and_shoot_at_them

This idea, intended to provoke an Iran war, was ultimately rejected:

Yea it was even to nutty for our government to do, I am sure there biggest fear was getting caught not the morality of it.

I love how just because you dont like that I am right about what a statement of fact is, you call it republican/fox news. What do any of those things have to do with a statement of fact?

Fact: "Knowledge or information based on real occurrences."

Enlighten me what are you right about?