Topic: The Sins John Edwards Did Not Commit
madisonman's photo
Sun 08/10/08 09:46 AM
John Edwards did not lie to get America into a war that has cost more than 4,000 American lives.

John Edwards did not commit acts of torture that violate the Geneva Conventions, American laws and commonly accepted standards of decency.

John Edwards did not commit massive acts of violation of the FISA law that involve thousands of counts of spying on Americans in violation of federal law.

John Edwards did not slander war heroes such as John Kerry and Max Cleland in the mindless pursuit of power.

John Edwards did not claim pre-emptive power to initiate wars without authorization, nor did John Edwards claim the power to issue pieces of paper that would negate a thousand American laws that he chose not to faithfully execute.

John Edwards did not claim executive privilege in the most outrageous, extra-legal manner in order to cover up major wrongdoing and probable criminal acts by multiple members of his administration.

John Edwards's sin hurt one very good woman and good kids, which is an unpardonable wrong.

John Edwards will not issue pardons for crimes that did grave damage to the nation.

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/16383

no photo
Sun 08/10/08 09:50 AM
So, what's your point????

madisonman's photo
Sun 08/10/08 10:04 AM
Well I am greatfull Edwards wasnt the front runner as this episode would have handed the nomination to that insane old man masqueradeing as a republican. :wink:

BobbyJ's photo
Sun 08/10/08 10:09 AM
Edited by BobbyJ on Sun 08/10/08 10:10 AM
I think what John Edwards does in his personal life is none of our business. If most people weren't so intent to judge others personal lives, neither Clinton or Edwards would have felt the need to lie about their personal lives.

WarElephant's photo
Sun 08/10/08 10:33 AM
Could someone enlighten me as to the substantive points in this thread?

madisonman's photo
Sun 08/10/08 10:36 AM
It s just a nice way to remind all the good people on Mingle that John Edwards sins are nothing compared to the ones of our sitting president. drinker

WarElephant's photo
Sun 08/10/08 10:39 AM

It s just a nice way to remind all the good people on Mingle that John Edwards sins are nothing compared to the ones of our sitting president. drinker


You do not justify bad behavior by referring worse behavior.

madisonman's photo
Sun 08/10/08 10:42 AM


It s just a nice way to remind all the good people on Mingle that John Edwards sins are nothing compared to the ones of our sitting president. drinker


You do not justify bad behavior by referring worse behavior.
I didnt justify it I dont think your comprehending what you are reading.

WarElephant's photo
Sun 08/10/08 10:44 AM



It s just a nice way to remind all the good people on Mingle that John Edwards sins are nothing compared to the ones of our sitting president. drinker


You do not justify bad behavior by referring worse behavior.
I didnt justify it I dont think your comprehending what you are reading.


So you are suggesting it was a coincidence you titled this thread "The Sins John Edwards Did Not Commit" and then simultaneously mentioned the sins of another, presumably the sitting president? Grow up.

madisonman's photo
Sun 08/10/08 10:48 AM




It s just a nice way to remind all the good people on Mingle that John Edwards sins are nothing compared to the ones of our sitting president. drinker


You do not justify bad behavior by referring worse behavior.
I didnt justify it I dont think your comprehending what you are reading.


So you are suggesting it was a coincidence you titled this thread "The Sins John Edwards Did Not Commit" and then simultaneously mentioned the sins of another, presumably the sitting president? Grow up.
Sorry bro I dont get that from the post. I guese we all have our own opinions I am off have a good day. drinker

WarElephant's photo
Sun 08/10/08 10:49 AM





It s just a nice way to remind all the good people on Mingle that John Edwards sins are nothing compared to the ones of our sitting president. drinker


You do not justify bad behavior by referring worse behavior.
I didnt justify it I dont think your comprehending what you are reading.


So you are suggesting it was a coincidence you titled this thread "The Sins John Edwards Did Not Commit" and then simultaneously mentioned the sins of another, presumably the sitting president? Grow up.
Sorry bro I dont get that from the post. I guese we all have our own opinions I am off have a good day. drinker


So you're saying you're not referencing Bush in the first post?

Zapchaser's photo
Sun 08/10/08 11:42 AM




It s just a nice way to remind all the good people on Mingle that John Edwards sins are nothing compared to the ones of our sitting president. drinker


You do not justify bad behavior by referring worse behavior.
I didnt justify it I dont think your comprehending what you are reading.


So you are suggesting it was a coincidence you titled this thread "The Sins John Edwards Did Not Commit" and then simultaneously mentioned the sins of another, presumably the sitting president? Grow up.
laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker drinker

madisonman's photo
Sun 08/10/08 12:27 PM


It s just a nice way to remind all the good people on Mingle that John Edwards sins are nothing compared to the ones of our sitting president. drinker


You do not justify bad behavior by referring worse behavior.
I think your not even interpiting your own words correctly. At no time did I justify Edwards behavior nor did the article. I suppose it was directed at those who are so indignant about his infadelties yet remain silent on the war crimes comitted by our government.

120557's photo
Sun 08/10/08 02:31 PM
Do you honestly think it is any different between a Dem or a Rep as to cover ups in the White House? As for sins, it seems the Dems are more good at getting caught with their pants down (or off).

madisonman's photo
Sun 08/10/08 02:35 PM

Do you honestly think it is any different between a Dem or a Rep as to cover ups in the White House? As for sins, it seems the Dems are more good at getting caught with their pants down (or off).
Once known as a crusader against child abuse and exploitation, Foley resigned from Congress on September 29, 2006 after allegations surfaced that he had sent suggestive emails and sexually explicit instant messages[1] to teenaged boys who had formerly served and were at that time serving as Congressional pages.[2][3] As a result of the disclosures, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement opened investigations of the messages to find possible criminal charges.[4] The House Ethics Committee has also opened an investigation into the response of the House Republican leadership and their staff to earlier warnings of Foley's conduct.[5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley

01tim's photo
Sun 08/10/08 03:41 PM
all fox new can talk about now is john Edwards. well at least john Edwards like women. not like must republicans.

WarElephant's photo
Sun 08/10/08 05:05 PM



It s just a nice way to remind all the good people on Mingle that John Edwards sins are nothing compared to the ones of our sitting president. drinker


You do not justify bad behavior by referring worse behavior.
I think your not even interpiting your own words correctly. At no time did I justify Edwards behavior nor did the article. I suppose it was directed at those who are so indignant about his infadelties yet remain silent on the war crimes comitted by our government.


Even if that's so, then what is the point of thread? According to you now, this topic has much more to do with the imperfections of Bush and his administration rather than the moral failure that is John Edwards. So what was the point?

120557's photo
Mon 08/11/08 10:44 AM
They are just trying to justify the Dems party.

madisonman's photo
Mon 08/11/08 10:52 AM
Once known as a crusader against child abuse and exploitation, Foley resigned from Congress on September 29, 2006 after allegations surfaced that he had sent suggestive emails and sexually explicit instant messages[1] to teenaged boys who had formerly served and were at that time serving as Congressional pages.[2][3] As a result of the disclosures, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement opened investigations of the messages to find possible criminal charges.[4] The House Ethics Committee has also opened an investigation into the response of the House Republican leadership and their staff to earlier warnings of Foley's conduct.[5]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Foley laugh