Topic: Who has to go???
IndnPrncs's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:02 AM





No one with cat allergies would be around me long enough for me to fall in love. I have 3 cats. I probably would not spend much time with someone who was allergic or didn't like them. That being said, as much as I love my pets, people come 1st. We'd have to make do until I could find the best possable homes for the kitties. sad


Wow I commend for that because when it comes down to it if a pet was that fulfilling you wouldnt be looking for a human being to share your life with............


I do truly love my pets, I used to work for the humane society it's hard to find someone who is more of an animal lover than I. As much as we like treat them like people, they are not. I was shocked when someone posted a thread about saving pets or people in a fire & the overwhelming majority said they would save thier pets 1st!


because ppl, well most ppl anyway, can take care of themselves. open doors windows ect. ur pet can't, they don't have thumbs. i'm w/ the majority, my boy comes first



Uh animals have been around since the beginning of time...........we may have domesticated them but they will survive without you when they have to its called animal instinct they dont loose that........and not all ppl can take care of themselves there are kids who cant and I would rather help them in a heart beat than an animal...........



You're not thinking of the whole picture.. You're only thinking of instinct but not what we've done to domesticate them nor what the world would be like with wild animals running around.. OR are you saying we should euthanize them for a potential mate?

no photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:03 AM
Edited by littleredhen on Thu 08/07/08 12:04 AM





No one with cat allergies would be around me long enough for me to fall in love. I have 3 cats. I probably would not spend much time with someone who was allergic or didn't like them. That being said, as much as I love my pets, people come 1st. We'd have to make do until I could find the best possable homes for the kitties. sad


Wow I commend for that because when it comes down to it if a pet was that fulfilling you wouldnt be looking for a human being to share your life with............


I do truly love my pets, I used to work for the humane society it's hard to find someone who is more of an animal lover than I. As much as we like treat them like people, they are not. I was shocked when someone posted a thread about saving pets or people in a fire & the overwhelming majority said they would save thier pets 1st!


because ppl, well most ppl anyway, can take care of themselves. open doors windows ect. ur pet can't, they don't have thumbs. i'm w/ the majority, my boy comes first



Uh animals have been around since the beginning of time...........we may have domesticated them but they will survive without you when they have to its called animal instinct they dont loose that........and not all ppl can take care of themselves there are kids who cant and I would rather help them in a heart beat than an animal...........


I seriousy doubt my spoiled little dog & my Fatcat could take care of themselves, but that isn't the issue. The issue is the value of human life.

rush2001's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:03 AM
Edited by rush2001 on Thu 08/07/08 12:04 AM
That's what it sounds like IP.

metalhead1969's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:04 AM

Uh animals have been around since the beginning of time...........we may have domesticated them but they will survive without you when they have to its called animal instinct they dont loose that........and not all ppl can take care of themselves there are kids who cant and I would rather help them in a heart beat than an animal...........


so ur tellin me that a dog, shut in a room that's on fire can use instinct to open the door and leave? they can wiggle thru the 2" gap in the window?
in a fire they r totally dependant on us to get out...

and i did say MOST ppl.

BlueskyJ's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:04 AM
Interesting question but I doubt it would come down to an either or type choice....if someone was so in love with their pet or pets they would know how their new boyfriend/girlfriend felt about it long before becoming committed....

I would say the boyfriend or girlfriend would depart long before an actual commitment was made....I agree its part of the package & it would be a given that everyone knew that from early on.....its really not a hard choice....the person with the pet would never be happy with someone who couldn't be happy around their pet & vice versa....

wiley's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:04 AM






No one with cat allergies would be around me long enough for me to fall in love. I have 3 cats. I probably would not spend much time with someone who was allergic or didn't like them. That being said, as much as I love my pets, people come 1st. We'd have to make do until I could find the best possable homes for the kitties. sad


Wow I commend for that because when it comes down to it if a pet was that fulfilling you wouldnt be looking for a human being to share your life with............


I do truly love my pets, I used to work for the humane society it's hard to find someone who is more of an animal lover than I. As much as we like treat them like people, they are not. I was shocked when someone posted a thread about saving pets or people in a fire & the overwhelming majority said they would save thier pets 1st!



Its a damn shame that humanity has went to sh!t when you put a pet(an animal) that would survive fine without over a human being............and people complain there are no more good people look in the mirror I say................frustrated


animals can no longer survive on their own unless we're ok with wild animals roaming the streets.. I for one am of the opinion that if I take on an animal then it's part of my family and I DO NOT just get rid of it b/c I've found a man and he is allergic...


Please do not think I take my responsability to my animals lightly. I am not talking about ditching my cats for a chance to have sex. I am talking about a serious realationship with someone who has a serious allergy. Like I said before, the senario is not likely but I value humans over animals.


It's highly unlikely a relationship would get to be serious with someone like that anyway. I don't necessarily have to know someone intimately before I invite them over... and more than likely if they were that alergic, they wouldn't come back.

Tanzkity's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:05 AM






No one with cat allergies would be around me long enough for me to fall in love. I have 3 cats. I probably would not spend much time with someone who was allergic or didn't like them. That being said, as much as I love my pets, people come 1st. We'd have to make do until I could find the best possable homes for the kitties. sad


Wow I commend for that because when it comes down to it if a pet was that fulfilling you wouldnt be looking for a human being to share your life with............


I do truly love my pets, I used to work for the humane society it's hard to find someone who is more of an animal lover than I. As much as we like treat them like people, they are not. I was shocked when someone posted a thread about saving pets or people in a fire & the overwhelming majority said they would save thier pets 1st!


because ppl, well most ppl anyway, can take care of themselves. open doors windows ect. ur pet can't, they don't have thumbs. i'm w/ the majority, my boy comes first



Uh animals have been around since the beginning of time...........we may have domesticated them but they will survive without you when they have to its called animal instinct they dont loose that........and not all ppl can take care of themselves there are kids who cant and I would rather help them in a heart beat than an animal...........


I seriouslt doubt my spoiled little dog & my Fatcat could take care of themselves, but that isn't the issue. The issue is the value of human life.


Ditto thats right and that is what im having the problem with when a person can be so clear cut to what value they put of a human being compared to an animal................

TwilightsTwin's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:06 AM
Original question: Who goes....Mate or pet?

"Goes" as in leave the house. Not putting anyone to sleep...mates or pets! No burning houses.

wiley's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:06 AM

Interesting question but I doubt it would come down to an either or type choice....if someone was so in love with their pet or pets they would know how their new boyfriend/girlfriend felt about it long before becoming committed....

I would say the boyfriend or girlfriend would depart long before an actual commitment was made....I agree its part of the package & it would be a given that everyone knew that from early on.....its really not a hard choice....the person with the pet would never be happy with someone who couldn't be happy around their pet & vice versa....


Exactly.

Sluggo's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:06 AM

Does anyone in this site with answers like this wonder why you are still single.......................


LMAO.......How true....laugh laugh laugh laugh

IndnPrncs's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:06 AM







No one with cat allergies would be around me long enough for me to fall in love. I have 3 cats. I probably would not spend much time with someone who was allergic or didn't like them. That being said, as much as I love my pets, people come 1st. We'd have to make do until I could find the best possable homes for the kitties. sad


Wow I commend for that because when it comes down to it if a pet was that fulfilling you wouldnt be looking for a human being to share your life with............


I do truly love my pets, I used to work for the humane society it's hard to find someone who is more of an animal lover than I. As much as we like treat them like people, they are not. I was shocked when someone posted a thread about saving pets or people in a fire & the overwhelming majority said they would save thier pets 1st!


because ppl, well most ppl anyway, can take care of themselves. open doors windows ect. ur pet can't, they don't have thumbs. i'm w/ the majority, my boy comes first



Uh animals have been around since the beginning of time...........we may have domesticated them but they will survive without you when they have to its called animal instinct they dont loose that........and not all ppl can take care of themselves there are kids who cant and I would rather help them in a heart beat than an animal...........


I seriouslt doubt my spoiled little dog & my Fatcat could take care of themselves, but that isn't the issue. The issue is the value of human life.


Ditto thats right and that is what im having the problem with when a person can be so clear cut to what value they put of a human being compared to an animal................


Do you have animals?

no photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:07 AM

Interesting question but I doubt it would come down to an either or type choice....if someone was so in love with their pet or pets they would know how their new boyfriend/girlfriend felt about it long before becoming committed....

I would say the boyfriend or girlfriend would depart long before an actual commitment was made....I agree its part of the package & it would be a given that everyone knew that from early on.....its really not a hard choice....the person with the pet would never be happy with someone who couldn't be happy around their pet & vice versa....


I think you are right. This is why I say it's an unlikely stiuation for me.

rush2001's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:08 AM
Also I have found animals a lot more worthy then some humans.

metalhead1969's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:08 AM

Original question: Who goes....Mate or pet?

"Goes" as in leave the house. Not putting anyone to sleep...mates or pets! No burning houses.


flowers sryflowers

Tanzkity's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:09 AM








No one with cat allergies would be around me long enough for me to fall in love. I have 3 cats. I probably would not spend much time with someone who was allergic or didn't like them. That being said, as much as I love my pets, people come 1st. We'd have to make do until I could find the best possable homes for the kitties. sad


Wow I commend for that because when it comes down to it if a pet was that fulfilling you wouldnt be looking for a human being to share your life with............


I do truly love my pets, I used to work for the humane society it's hard to find someone who is more of an animal lover than I. As much as we like treat them like people, they are not. I was shocked when someone posted a thread about saving pets or people in a fire & the overwhelming majority said they would save thier pets 1st!


because ppl, well most ppl anyway, can take care of themselves. open doors windows ect. ur pet can't, they don't have thumbs. i'm w/ the majority, my boy comes first



Uh animals have been around since the beginning of time...........we may have domesticated them but they will survive without you when they have to its called animal instinct they dont loose that........and not all ppl can take care of themselves there are kids who cant and I would rather help them in a heart beat than an animal...........


I seriouslt doubt my spoiled little dog & my Fatcat could take care of themselves, but that isn't the issue. The issue is the value of human life.


Ditto thats right and that is what im having the problem with when a person can be so clear cut to what value they put of a human being compared to an animal................


Do you have animals?


I have had several throughout my life but I dont give them value over any human being..................that would never happen........and actually my daughter had a cat and we found out she was allergic........and she loved the poor thing but I didnt pic the animal over my kid................the cat had to go................

TwilightsTwin's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:09 AM


Original question: Who goes....Mate or pet?

"Goes" as in leave the house. Not putting anyone to sleep...mates or pets! No burning houses.


flowers sryflowers


THANK YOU!!!flowers :banana: flowers

Sluggo's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:10 AM
I'd give my Dog to the Korean Family next door pitchfork pitchfork pitchfork pitchfork ...lol

wiley's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:10 AM









No one with cat allergies would be around me long enough for me to fall in love. I have 3 cats. I probably would not spend much time with someone who was allergic or didn't like them. That being said, as much as I love my pets, people come 1st. We'd have to make do until I could find the best possable homes for the kitties. sad


Wow I commend for that because when it comes down to it if a pet was that fulfilling you wouldnt be looking for a human being to share your life with............


I do truly love my pets, I used to work for the humane society it's hard to find someone who is more of an animal lover than I. As much as we like treat them like people, they are not. I was shocked when someone posted a thread about saving pets or people in a fire & the overwhelming majority said they would save thier pets 1st!


because ppl, well most ppl anyway, can take care of themselves. open doors windows ect. ur pet can't, they don't have thumbs. i'm w/ the majority, my boy comes first



Uh animals have been around since the beginning of time...........we may have domesticated them but they will survive without you when they have to its called animal instinct they dont loose that........and not all ppl can take care of themselves there are kids who cant and I would rather help them in a heart beat than an animal...........


I seriouslt doubt my spoiled little dog & my Fatcat could take care of themselves, but that isn't the issue. The issue is the value of human life.


Ditto thats right and that is what im having the problem with when a person can be so clear cut to what value they put of a human being compared to an animal................


Do you have animals?


I have had several throughout my life but I dont give them value over any human being..................that would never happen........and actually my daughter had a cat and we found out she was allergic........and she loved the poor thing but I didnt pic the animal over my kid................the cat had to go................


Well I doubt anybody would choose their pet over their child...geeze... noway

no photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:10 AM







No one with cat allergies would be around me long enough for me to fall in love. I have 3 cats. I probably would not spend much time with someone who was allergic or didn't like them. That being said, as much as I love my pets, people come 1st. We'd have to make do until I could find the best possable homes for the kitties. sad


Wow I commend for that because when it comes down to it if a pet was that fulfilling you wouldnt be looking for a human being to share your life with............


I do truly love my pets, I used to work for the humane society it's hard to find someone who is more of an animal lover than I. As much as we like treat them like people, they are not. I was shocked when someone posted a thread about saving pets or people in a fire & the overwhelming majority said they would save thier pets 1st!


because ppl, well most ppl anyway, can take care of themselves. open doors windows ect. ur pet can't, they don't have thumbs. i'm w/ the majority, my boy comes first



Uh animals have been around since the beginning of time...........we may have domesticated them but they will survive without you when they have to its called animal instinct they dont loose that........and not all ppl can take care of themselves there are kids who cant and I would rather help them in a heart beat than an animal...........


I seriouslt doubt my spoiled little dog & my Fatcat could take care of themselves, but that isn't the issue. The issue is the value of human life.


Ditto thats right and that is what im having the problem with when a person can be so clear cut to what value they put of a human being compared to an animal................


I abosolutley value a human life over an animals. We will just have to agree to disagree on this one.flowerforyou

wiley's photo
Thu 08/07/08 12:12 AM








No one with cat allergies would be around me long enough for me to fall in love. I have 3 cats. I probably would not spend much time with someone who was allergic or didn't like them. That being said, as much as I love my pets, people come 1st. We'd have to make do until I could find the best possable homes for the kitties. sad


Wow I commend for that because when it comes down to it if a pet was that fulfilling you wouldnt be looking for a human being to share your life with............


I do truly love my pets, I used to work for the humane society it's hard to find someone who is more of an animal lover than I. As much as we like treat them like people, they are not. I was shocked when someone posted a thread about saving pets or people in a fire & the overwhelming majority said they would save thier pets 1st!


because ppl, well most ppl anyway, can take care of themselves. open doors windows ect. ur pet can't, they don't have thumbs. i'm w/ the majority, my boy comes first



Uh animals have been around since the beginning of time...........we may have domesticated them but they will survive without you when they have to its called animal instinct they dont loose that........and not all ppl can take care of themselves there are kids who cant and I would rather help them in a heart beat than an animal...........


I seriouslt doubt my spoiled little dog & my Fatcat could take care of themselves, but that isn't the issue. The issue is the value of human life.


Ditto thats right and that is what im having the problem with when a person can be so clear cut to what value they put of a human being compared to an animal................


I abosolutley value a human life over an animals. We will just have to agree to disagree on this one.flowerforyou


laugh Actually I think you're pretty much in agreement... laugh