1 2 4 Next
Topic: controlled media
Fanta46's photo
Sat 06/28/08 03:15 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Sat 06/28/08 03:20 PM

Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who complains about 'managed news' falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters -- and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.

The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the controlled media — television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters.




Common sense and using your own mind is a great factor in whether or not your mind can be manipulated!



In a small pamphlet published by the National Alliance titled, "Who Rules America? The authors stated,

"Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizens who complains about 'managed news' falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a 'heads I win, tails you lose' situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters--an no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it. The control of the opinion molding media is monolithic. All controlled media--television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures--speak with a single voice each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative sources of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters."

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/7214

You fail brooke!!!

Quote your source next time!grumble grumble


Fanta46's photo
Sat 06/28/08 03:20 PM



Yeah it is, and can explain why in one simple word: Power

The media has the ability to shape how we think, act, how we live our lives, now more then ever before. If the media says it, it has to be true is the mentality of some people, if not a majority of them. The media plays on this trust factor, and uses it to control us basically into seeing things their way.


The propaganda and the dishonesty of both the media and the Administration make of real people some kinds of robots where they take everything said as a full truth . This is really sad to happen in 2008 . People should know better .
In my opinion the media is controlled by : the huge companies , the Zionists, and the Administration . They work together to bring any issue they want .


Sam you are from Canada, so you have no RIGHT to bash the United States. Being from Canada, your opinion is totally irrelevant, null and void.

Try bashing your own country.explode

Lindyy



This a thread title "controlled media"
Its not about an internal political issue!


Fanta46's photo
Sat 06/28/08 03:23 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Sat 06/28/08 03:29 PM


Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who complains about 'managed news' falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters -- and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.

The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the controlled media — television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters.




Common sense and using your own mind is a great factor in whether or not your mind can be manipulated!



In a small pamphlet published by the National Alliance titled, "Who Rules America? The authors stated,

"Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizens who complains about 'managed news' falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a 'heads I win, tails you lose' situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters--an no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it. The control of the opinion molding media is monolithic. All controlled media--television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures--speak with a single voice each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative sources of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters."

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/7214

You fail brooke!!!

Quote your source next time!grumble grumble


Sat 06/28/08 03:00 PM
More cut and paste and no real intellectual input by the poster.

Brooke is the only one with any intellectual, well-thought-out opinions, facts, and to my relief, not affected by the maniuplators who twist and turn and take out of context every and anything that is said or done.

Lindyy






Should I post the rest of brookes thoughts!
There are actually 2 or 3 web site articles of them!

Fanta46's photo
Sat 06/28/08 03:34 PM
Irony!! LOL

The article titled,
Conspiracy Theory: Makes Sense To Me; What About You?
"CONSPIRACY THEORY VERSUS THE BIG LIE THEORY AND THE SEARCH FOR TRUTH"

By Fahim A. Knight

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/7214

where brooke took her opinion
when you click on about us it says,



something about us . . .
This site was born from a desire to expose America's fraudulent monetary system and the evil of charging interest on money loaned.

It has since grown into a labor of love and a quest for truth and justice in all aspects of life and human culture with a special focus on political and economic justice - free from racism and oppression.

We welcome you to join us in sharing information, exposing lies, and enlightening each other with personal experiences and observations.


Isnt that ironic!!grumble grumble grumble

brooke007's photo
Sat 06/28/08 03:36 PM


Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who complains about 'managed news' falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters -- and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.

The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the controlled media — television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters.




Common sense and using your own mind is a great factor in whether or not your mind can be manipulated!



In a small pamphlet published by the National Alliance titled, "Who Rules America? The authors stated,

"Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizens who complains about 'managed news' falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a 'heads I win, tails you lose' situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters--an no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it. The control of the opinion molding media is monolithic. All controlled media--television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures--speak with a single voice each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative sources of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters."

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/7214

You fail brooke!!!

Quote your source next time!grumble grumble




eeeekkk..i did not know apa format was required.
i thought that the above was an interesting statment. describing perhaps how the brainwashing through mass media could be accomplished.

u think there is no truth in that statment?

we are unable to make an educated opinion without knowing all the facts. im not talking about the election itself...who wins is perhaps not important...and already decided per the media.

Fanta46's photo
Sat 06/28/08 03:42 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Sat 06/28/08 03:53 PM


Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who complains about 'managed news' falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters -- and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.

The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the controlled media — television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters.




Common sense and using your own mind is a great factor in whether or not your mind can be manipulated!



In a small pamphlet published by the National Alliance titled, "Who Rules America? The authors stated,

"Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizens who complains about 'managed news' falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a 'heads I win, tails you lose' situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters--an no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it. The control of the opinion molding media is monolithic. All controlled media--television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures--speak with a single voice each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative sources of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people which might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters."

http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/7214

You fail brooke!!!

Quote your source next time!grumble grumble




In Wikipedia it says about the organization where the original thoughts in the pamplet come from, The National Alliance;


The National Alliance is a white nationalist and a white separatist organization. It was founded by William Luther Pierce, and is based in Hillsboro, West Virginia. Although it is based in the United States, the National Alliance claims to have members in various countries throughout the world. Membership is not based upon citizenship in any particular country, but on perceived white, gentile European ancestry. The National Alliance is often included in lists of neo-Nazi groups, in part due to its glorification of Adolf Hitler. For example, an article appearing in a 1989 issue of its magazine National Vanguard celebrated the 100th anniversary of Hitler's birth, declaring him "the greatest man of our era".

I hope brooke didnt realize who she was stealing her thoughts from!


brooke007's photo
Sat 06/28/08 03:42 PM
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/shadow/jewishmedia.htm


this was the web site i read

brooke007's photo
Sat 06/28/08 03:42 PM

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/shadow/jewishmedia.htm

"shadow goverment"
this was the web site i read

Fanta46's photo
Sat 06/28/08 03:50 PM
Edited by Fanta46 on Sat 06/28/08 03:51 PM
Sorry about that brooke, but you should post original thoughts and not those of others unless you quote the source!
Especially in your own thread title controlled media.

You should also realize where the thoughts originate from. Otherwise you are a victim of a couple things of which be controlled by the media is important to point out!

I dont think you knew where these thoughts came from, but I do think you intended to pass them off as your own!

Guarantee to yourself that my thoughts are not controlled by anyone and that I have the intelligence to figure out what is what!
I read a lot of different things but my mind is controlled by me!

brooke007's photo
Sat 06/28/08 03:59 PM
and by quoting that article........Im not saying i agree with it in its entireity.

i was just expressing how i thought if the media was controlled...it could go pretty deep and have been going on for quite some length of time (my whole life???)
perhaps it is a sort of "conspiracy" theory.

but if one KNOWS through the media we arent being given facts..we are given small pieces instead...then one does have to wonder who is doing it. and what is there total intention.

now i for one DISLIKE brainwashing media and to think that it would even be allowed. it speaks of corruption. and is comparable to how hitler or huessian operated...using media ploys



we are not being given the truth nor the ability to make an accurate opinion. we are being given crusts of bread.

TxsGal3333's photo
Sat 06/28/08 04:00 PM
This is a friendly reminder at no time will attacking other members be tolerated. It has no bearing where people live we all have and opinion and should be able to voice it.

If and only if it is keep within a debate form.

Once you step over that line then your opinion has crossed the line. It is not allowed to call a member out by name and attack them.

Just because your views are different then theirs. Remember we are all different and no one thinks exactly as another.

That is what makes the Beauty of this World.

With that said please refrain yourself from personal attacks. If for some reason that can not be done then pass up the Thread.

Have a Great Day!

Thank You
Site Mod
Kristi

brooke007's photo
Sat 06/28/08 04:05 PM

Sorry about that brooke, but you should post original thoughts and not those of others unless you quote the source!
Especially in your own thread title controlled media.

You should also realize where the thoughts originate from. Otherwise you are a victim of a couple things of which be controlled by the media is important to point out!

I dont think you knew where these thoughts came from, but I do think you intended to pass them off as your own!

Guarantee to yourself that my thoughts are not controlled by anyone and that I have the intelligence to figure out what is what!
I read a lot of different things but my mind is controlled by me!


oh..i didnt mean to pass them off as my own..i was just trying to define what media control perhaps could be.
i do apologize for being misleading.
im not the best at clearly stating my opinions..and was trying to give a better idea about what kind of media control i was speaking of.
which is complete media control.
complete lack of freedom of press..

Fanta46's photo
Sat 06/28/08 04:08 PM


Sorry about that brooke, but you should post original thoughts and not those of others unless you quote the source!
Especially in your own thread title controlled media.

You should also realize where the thoughts originate from. Otherwise you are a victim of a couple things of which be controlled by the media is important to point out!

I dont think you knew where these thoughts came from, but I do think you intended to pass them off as your own!

Guarantee to yourself that my thoughts are not controlled by anyone and that I have the intelligence to figure out what is what!
I read a lot of different things but my mind is controlled by me!


oh..i didnt mean to pass them off as my own..i was just trying to define what media control perhaps could be.
i do apologize for being misleading.
im not the best at clearly stating my opinions..and was trying to give a better idea about what kind of media control i was speaking of.
which is complete media control.
complete lack of freedom of press..



Ive already forgotten it brooke!
Just remember to quote your source. Its common courtesy!bigsmile

Fanta46's photo
Sat 06/28/08 09:30 PM
The compliant mainstream media, of course, is no help. The war in Iraq has become a major generator of advertising revenue for these corporations, so there is no incentive to actually report the truth, but rather manipulate the fiction. Iraq has become a prestige destination for every aspiring journalist or struggling anchor, determined to get “the big story.” The most recent manifestation of this syndrome is CBS News anchor Katie Couric, who earlier this week travelled to Iraq because she was (in her own words), “Curious about very basic questions regarding living conditions, about how much fear there is in the street, about how the soldiers really are doing.” That the situation in Iraq has been boiled down to these three big, burning issues (living conditions, fear in the streets, and how the troops are really doing), and that CBS is sending their multi-million-dollar investment to investigate, speaks volumes about the truly degenerate state of American journalism today.

The real big three she should be addressing are “Why do Americans keep dying?” “Who is killing them?” and “Why?” Of course, answering these questions would undermine the very fantasy world Couric is being sent to cover, one where Americans are doing good deeds in the name of peace and justice for downtrodden Iraqis. Couric’s jaunt is fraud on a massive scale. Ironically, she herself acknowledged this when she admitted that her up-beat reports from Iraq were reflective of what the US military wanted her to see, and not honest ‘reporting’ on her part.

If Couric and her ilk won’t answer these questions, I will. “Why do Americans keep dying?” Simple: Because we are in Iraq. We don’t belong there. Our presence is derived from our own violation of law, not someone else’s, and as such any effort to sustain our presence is tainted by this same foundation of illegitimacy. In short, Americans will keep dying in Iraq as long as we remain in Iraq. If Katie wanted to really get to the bottom of this story, she could venture out on her own to any one of the villages and towns where Americans have been killed recently. Of course, she would probably end up dead herself, which would defeat the purpose of trying to report the story.

“Who is killing them?” Another easy answer: Iraqis. We are occupying their homeland. We are violating their sovereignty. We are butchering, abusing and torturing their citizens. Our continued presence is an affront to the socio-economic-political fabric that is (or was) Iraqi society. If someone occupied my hometown in the same manner Americans occupy Iraq, I’d be killing them any way I could. And I would be called a hero by my own people, and not a terrorist. The Bush administration, in an effort to deflect public attention away from this reality, has created the fiction of a massive al-Qaida presence in Iraq, working in parallel with a similarly large Iranian Revolutionary Guard Command presence, which apparently is responsible for the majority of anti-American violence and dead U.S. troops.

Rhetoric aside, however, American officials who make these claims have been unable to back them up with hard facts and figures. There is an al-Qaida presence in Iraq. However, the majority of what is known as “al-Qaida in Iraq” is composed of Iraqis, not foreigners. The whole phenomenon is a direct result of the American occupation of Iraq, and would dissipate the moment America left the country. Likewise, the accusation of direct Iranian involvement in anti-American violence is questionable. Iranian political support of Iraqi Shiite groups who violently oppose the American occupation of Iraq is real, but then again we know this: We invited the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq to join us in toppling Saddam. Based out of Iran, functioning as a de-facto arm of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Command, SCIRI did as we asked. Why, then, are we shocked when SCIRI maintains ties with the very entity that created and nurtured it? It is Iraqi Shiites who are killing Americans, not Iranians. And they would kill us with or without the support of Iran.

Now we come to the third and perhaps most difficult question: “Why?” In some odd way, Katie Couric’s jaunt to Iraq answers that question: Because Americans truly don’t care. Oh, we care about vague softball issues, such as “conditions in the street,” “fear,” and of course, “how the American troops are really doing,” especially when they are fed to us in 30-second sound bites or three- minute “in-depth” stories. Little feel good segments planted in between commercials, designed not to infringe on our intellectual curiosity for more than 30 minutes so we don’t loose our focus watching the latest “reality” show or made-for-television drama.

The fact is, Couric’s made-for-television news is to what is really happening in Iraq as “CSI: Las Vegas” is to what is really happening on the streets of Sin City. CBS knows that, which is why they are packaging Katie in this fashion. The shame is that for most Americans watching, they think they’re getting the real deal. They are not, but will continue to wallow in their ignorant indifference. Katie will struggle to tell us that our kids keep dying in Iraq to “improve the quality of life” and “reduce the level of fear” on the streets of Baghdad. She solemnly informs us that “our boys and girls” are suffering, but they know it is in support of a just and noble cause. Katie will continue to report the story in Iraq from the perspective of an American political dynamic, not Iraqi reality.

She won’t go visit one of the American mercenary units in Iraq, the private military contractors who challenge the American military for numerical supremacy. She won’t burrow into the never-never land of legal ambiguity that allows these mercenaries to commit murder at will, to treat Iraq (and Iraqis) as second-class citizens in their own nation, and whose continued abuse of Iraq results in a deep and undying hatred for all things American. Katie may catch a movie in a hardened underground theater on one of the Pentagon’s mega-bases, or go shopping in a PX inside the “Green Zone” to get a “feel” of life for our troops, but she won’t venture up north, into Kurdistan, where other secure outposts of foreign occupation sit, out of sight and mind. If Couric would visit the Iraqi Oil Ministry, she might be shocked to witness the legal maneuvering and exploitation carried out by foreign oil companies (including, directly or indirectly, American oil companies).

Working with local Kurdish officials, small oil exploration and drilling camps are sprouting up all over northern Iraq, where they siphon off the wealth of the Iraqi people. Shipped out of Iraq via Turkey and (surprisingly) Iran, using long-established smuggling routes, these illegal ventures are generating billions of dollars in income for oil companies, and because these ventures aren’t supposed to exist, this income goes unreported. You can’t miss these sites. Any review of Google-Earth imagery would show these facilities springing up like mushrooms over the last few years. The U.S. military knows about them, and yet does nothing. Note to Richard Kaplan (Katie Couric’s producer): If you want to investigate this story, I’ll provide you with the geographic coordinates. Drive up and try to talk your way into the security perimeter. Position Katie well for the camera shot and demand answers. Just look out for the Canadian, South African or American mercenaries who are charged by “Big Oil” to keep this dirty little secret “secret.”

Instead of going to Iraq to report on why Americans keep dying, Katie could just stay here, in America. There are any number of corporations whose board rooms she could visit. Or she could smooth talk her way into a number of country clubs, to interview the human face of the “military industrial complex” that President Eisenhower warned us about a half-century ago. She might take a look at congressional campaign financing, where the profits from these corporations fund the campaigns of the politicians who continue to do nothing about Iraq. Then, and just then, would Katie come close to answering the question of “Why?”

But she won’t. Or should I say, she can’t. CBS is owned by General Electric. GE is working hard to get favorable trading status with any number of foreign trading partners. The U.S. trade representative is working hard on GE’s behalf. Hard-nosed “reporting” by the likes of Couric would not go over well in the bowels of the White House, where instructions to the U.S. trade representative are issued. “I’m Katie Couric,” her broadcast could begin. “Tonight I am declaring independence from corporate control over how I report (i.e., read) the news.” Answering the “why” of Iraq requires confronting the layers of corruption and corporate domination of America on so many levels that even if Katie wanted to, she couldn’t - at least not from her perch as anchor of the CBS Evening News.

In a way, Iraq is a manifestation of all that ails America today. A complete breakdown of fundamental societal checks and balances brought on by greed and hubris. From General Petraeus who will give it, to the mindless corporate-owned minions who populate much of Congress who will receive it, to the entertainment-as-news media which will report on it, and to the American people who will consume it with no foundation upon which to evaluate it, the “Petraeus Report” will have little relevance to what is really going on in Iraq. Once again, Americans will be searching for a solution to a problem they have yet to properly define.

Just ask Katie Couric. Or better yet, watch her.

http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/media/2007/0906reporting.htm

Fanta46's photo
Sat 06/28/08 09:31 PM
I thought you might find that interesting brookeflowerforyou

adj4u's photo
Sat 06/28/08 11:14 PM
just passing threw

ducking the various innuendos and propagandistic remarks


laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

are we having fun yet

flowerforyou flowerforyou flowerforyou flowerforyou flowerforyou

1 2 4 Next