Community > Posts By > Sojourning_Soul
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Wed 07/20/16 07:33 AM
|
|
![]() Thanks Con! I see you fixed it below.... |
|
|
|
Topic:
The Speech at the RNC
|
|
It was the fault of the cameraman taking the video! Oh sorry, wrong convention ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Mon 07/18/16 08:25 AM
|
|
it doesn't 'always' come back to race and nothing in the official BLM movement has blamed 'white man' how come people can blame and accuse government of all types of terrible things, but get so offended if black people have a gripe with the system? Because their message is usually exclusive of others, not inclusive. Why Black Lives Matter and not "OUR" lives matter? Statistics don't support that black lives have fewer choices or options than anyone else except in rhetoric. ![]() |
|
|
|
WE THE PEOPLE..... until we give that right away as well under the rule of liberal led lawlessness |
|
|
|
Three Police Officers Killed by Multiple Attackers in Baton Rouge Three police officers were shot to death and several others wounded in Baton Rouge, Louisiana on Sunday, the city's mayor said, as the country remained on edge in the wake of police shootings of black men and the killings of five Dallas officers. The officers in Baton Rouge were responding to a call of shots fired when they were ambushed by at least one gunman, Mayor Kip Holden told NBC News. One suspect is dead and police are checking the shooting scene with a robot to make sure there are no explosives, Baton Rouge Police spokesman L'Jean Mckneely said. Police told reporters authorities are seeking more than one suspect and said the public should be on the lookout for people dressed in black and carrying long guns. Earlier, a spokesman for the East Baton Rouge Sheriff's Office said police and sheriff's deputies were involved in the shooting incident, which occurred around 9 a.m. local time. "Multiple officers from both agencies sustained injuries and were transported to local hospitals," he said in an email. He said there were no firm numbers on the number hurt or the extent of injuries. http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/police-officers-shot-in/2016/07/17/id/739054/ Wonder how the BLM will respond to the black communities that will suffer when police officers fail to police their areas for them out of fear for their own lives? |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sun 07/17/16 09:35 AM
|
|
Al Sharpton sued for allegedly swiping $16K from Arizona man Shakedown Sharpton has struck again, according to an Arizona trucker, who says in a new federal lawsuit that the good reverend promised to help him, then took him for $16,000. “He’s a crook, he’s a fraud, and that’s all he is,” complains Reggie Anders Sr., who sought out the Rev. Al Sharpton for help resolving a 2009 discrimination dispute with Verizon. “He didn’t do anything he promised,” Anders said Saturday by phone from Mesa, Ariz. “Absolutely nothing.” Anders reached out to Sharpton early last year on the advice of his own minister, the Rev. David Wade of Phoenix. Wade knew Franklyn Richards, the chairman of Sharpton’s National Action Network, and set up a meeting. Anders and his pastor flew east for the sitdown at NAN headquarters in Harlem in March 2015. “I thought he was an honest guy,” Anders said of meeting Sharpton. “I thought he would do what he said he would do.” http://nypost.com/2016/07/17/al-sharpton-sued-for-allegedly-swiping-16k-from-arizona-man/ So he gives him a bribe and expects him to be honest....? ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sun 07/17/16 08:31 AM
|
|
It's always the cops or whitey taking advantage , killing, and making black lives difficult depending on which group you listen to. Meanwhile black on black crime, murders, and abuses are higher than they have ever been, but the conversation isn't about that! What about ALL abuse, ALL crime, why not about those who always seem to avoid prosecution even when they tank the economy and steal our homes, jobs, and savings, creating the chaos..... No.... we bail them out! How about those responsible for creating the unrest in the world, jeopardizing our country, lying to us from their guilded, guarded chambers? The ones with the large pensions we give them for life for allowing us life under their bad decisions.... while we get welfare, food stamps, taxes and SS paid for by money that was ours in the first place! Nope! It's about guns, terrorism, or racism! It's the peoples fault for not borrowing and spending enough! The Beast must be fed! Or is it the FED is a Beast? But this isn't even really about all that.... but it is It's never about the conversations that should be had, or by the people with the power to do something about it. Those people are too busy running for re-election, campaigning for a corrupt nominee, or selling their brand of racial hatred from their studios and newsroom around the country. After all, violence, sex, corruption, and religion are the big markets in this economy, and now it's a multi-billion dollar election year with the two worst candidates they could find to distract us from the failures the two party system has sponsored for us! Us against them, white against black, guns and terrorists, the 1% against the rest of us..... but they offer us another (and probably the most corrupt example of the 1%) corrupt Clinton or a billionaire real estate mogul to lead us out of our misery! I don't know about most of you, some I have my concerns with, but I don't have a racist or bigoted bone in my body! I don't need someone to tell me how I should think or who my enemies are..... I guess that makes me the enemy somehow though because I support the Constitution and peoples rights under it that are being taken away in the name of our security and safety from THE ENEMY.... details at 11! I've always hated the analogy, but it surely is becoming "We the sheeple"..... and I am sick in my heart and soul what we have allowed our real enemy, ourselves, to reduce us to in the name of progress and prosperity by not using the true power we possess but instead let it be destroyed and taken from us by the tricks of the carnival barkers we call politicians and social and religious icons. jmo |
|
|
|
Topic:
What is BLM?
|
|
The American People Just Humiliated Obama Obama’s support for Black Lives Matter is becoming one of his defining legacies. His cheerleading for a group of violent agitators who condone and commit acts of violence toward police has infuriated many Americans. And how the American people have reacted is a major slap to Obama’s face. Obama’s administration instituted a plan where if anyone started a petition on the White House website and garnered 100,000 signatures, Obama would respond. After five Dallas police officers were murdered in a sniper-style attack at a Black Lives Matter protest, someone started a petition to recognize Black Lives Matter as a terrorist organization. In just days, the petition soared past the 100,000 signature mark. Now Obama will be forced to respond. The Daily Caller reports: A White House petition to formally recognize the Black Lives Matter movement as a terrorist organization garnered it’s one-hundred-thousandth signature Monday afternoon, the minimum-threshold for earning a response from the administration. The petition had been created on Wednesday, July 6, but had only gathered 12,000 signatures in its first two days online. “Terrorism is defined as the use of violence and intimidation in pursuit of political aims,” writes the petitions author. “This definition is the same definition used to declare ISIS and other groups, as terrorist organizations.” But Dallas wasn’t the only scene of Black Lives Matter violence. A Black Lives Matter protest in Minnesota quickly spiraled into anarchy as over 20 police officers were injured. One cop suffered broken vertebrae after a thug dropped a concrete cinder block on his head. Cuz the Media tells us #BlackLivesMatter protests are peaceful-n-stuff… pic.twitter.com/ZOPsCTVoZu — Boston Bobblehead (@DBloom451) July 10, 2016 Violence toward police in Minnesota was just the standard operating procedure of Black Lives Matter; implementing their anti-police rhetoric. Last year, Black Lives Matter activists marched at the Minnesota state fair, chanting, “Pigs in a blanket; fry ‘em like bacon!” After this horrific display of encouraging violence against police, Obama invited the Black Lives Matters leaders to the White House. Critics contend his embrace of the movement validates their behavior and spurs individuals to escalate from hateful rhetoric to physical attacks against law enforcement. The fact that over 100,000 individuals rose up and delivered such a harsh rebuke sends the message that American’s are enraged at Obama for instigating attacks on the police by wholeheartedly supporting a noxious group like Black Lives Matter. Did you sign the petition? http://www.americanpatriotdaily.com/latest/the-american-people-just-humiliated-obama/ |
|
|
|
Topic:
What is BLM?
|
|
The phrase “black lives matter” was born the night of July 13, 2013, when Alicia Garza, an Oakland-based community organizer, learned that George Zimmerman had been acquitted in the shooting death of unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin. Garza immediately thought of her younger brother, who is about the same size and build as Martin, and felt it could just as easily have been him who was killed. In a 2015 interview, Garza recalled: The one thing I remember from that evening, other than crying myself to sleep that night, was the way in which as a black person, I felt incredibly vulnerable, incredibly exposed and incredibly enraged. . . . It was a verdict that said: black people are not safe in America. That’s a feeling most black folks had, a feeling that I certainly had, and that many black folks in your churches had. Garza immediately logged onto Facebook and posted an impassioned message that ended with the words, “Our lives matter, Black Lives Matter.” When fellow activist Patrisse Cullors saw Garza’s post, she combined the now famous final phrase with a hashtag and began sharing it to foster a discussion about protecting the dignity and affirming the value of black lives. The next day, Garza and Cullors spoke together about organizing a campaign around the discussion. Finally, the two reached out to Opal Tometti, another activist they knew in the field of immigrant rights. The three women started by setting up Tumblr and Twitter accounts and encouraging users to share stories of why black lives matter just as much as any other lives. The slogan gained traction on social media, and with some initial gatherings, the Black Lives Matter protest movement we know today was born. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/is-black-lives-matter-the-new-civil-rights-movement So I guess the whole BLM is based on false premises. The jury found Zimmerman NOT guilty. So just because this "activist" had a different opinion then those that actually HEARD ALL THE EVIDENCE they started this movement. Today this same movement continues to use lies like "Hands Up Don't Shoot" from the Ferguson tragedy to promote this agenda that somehow black lives don't matter to anyone. Whatever the original reasons were, it has morphed into a just another racism industry group. no, its not a false premise a jury finding someone not guilty doesn't mean anything except what their legal fate is So Clinton IS guilty! Got it! Thanks! ![]() |
|
|
|
Topic:
What is BLM?
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 07/16/16 02:53 PM
|
|
Teaching kids to riot and disrespectfully disrupting the events of others rather than sponsoring their own.... Isn't that just adding more to the problem? |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 07/16/16 02:46 PM
|
|
Hillary Clinton's IRS abuse chutzpah After skating through the FBI investigation and successfully stonewalling the Benghazi committee, Hillary Clinton is now worried that Donald Trump will use the IRS against his political enemies. Maybe someone needs to sideline her under a new concussion protocol for political candidates, or perhaps she has joined Supreme Court Ruth Bader Ginsburg in the "mind is shot" (as Trump tweeted about Ginsburg) category for national leaders. Either way, what the heck. One might give Clinton, the presumptive Democratic nominee, a small amount of credence if she had joined Republicans in their efforts to impeach IRS Commissioner John Koskinen for his part in the cover-up of Lois Lerner's campaign against conservative groups from her IRS perch, but she didn't. Is it possible that Clinton is so unaware of what is going on that she didn't know that the Obama IRS has been weaponized against Tea Party groups? http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/presidential-campaign/287994-hillary-clintons-irs-abuse-chutzpah |
|
|
|
Topic:
What is BLM?
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 07/16/16 02:40 PM
|
|
BLM is Bureau of Land Management, isn't it? Yep. Another criminal organization! ![]() Yup, just like the MOB, they own Nevada... ![]() ![]() ![]() Yeah that slimey Harry Reids family/crew! |
|
|
|
Topic:
What is BLM?
|
|
BLM is Bureau of Land Management, isn't it? Yep. Another criminal organization! ![]() |
|
|
|
Topic:
What is BLM?
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Sat 07/16/16 02:29 PM
|
|
The phrase “black lives matter” was born the night of July 13, 2013, when Alicia Garza, an Oakland-based community organizer, learned that George Zimmerman had been acquitted in the shooting death of unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin. Garza immediately thought of her younger brother, who is about the same size and build as Martin, and felt it could just as easily have been him who was killed. In a 2015 interview, Garza recalled: The one thing I remember from that evening, other than crying myself to sleep that night, was the way in which as a black person, I felt incredibly vulnerable, incredibly exposed and incredibly enraged. . . . It was a verdict that said: black people are not safe in America. That’s a feeling most black folks had, a feeling that I certainly had, and that many black folks in your churches had. Garza immediately logged onto Facebook and posted an impassioned message that ended with the words, “Our lives matter, Black Lives Matter.” When fellow activist Patrisse Cullors saw Garza’s post, she combined the now famous final phrase with a hashtag and began sharing it to foster a discussion about protecting the dignity and affirming the value of black lives. The next day, Garza and Cullors spoke together about organizing a campaign around the discussion. Finally, the two reached out to Opal Tometti, another activist they knew in the field of immigrant rights. The three women started by setting up Tumblr and Twitter accounts and encouraging users to share stories of why black lives matter just as much as any other lives. The slogan gained traction on social media, and with some initial gatherings, the Black Lives Matter protest movement we know today was born. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/is-black-lives-matter-the-new-civil-rights-movement Founded on racism. Whooda thunk it? They even adopted the false line of "hands up, don't shoot" even after that was proven a lie I'm against profiling, but these cops put their lives on the line every day facing bad odds in poor distressed and struggling communities and notable high crime areas. There are bad cops and they should be charged when they step over the line, but crying wolf with every incident is NOT helping the cause in my opinion. It's always best to pick your battles if you hope to win. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 07/15/16 02:35 PM
|
|
For all that followed the lunar missions i'm sure you must be aware of how many people were actually on the moon & what equipment so can you explain this photo, the reflection on the visor can answer a lot of questions & this is a real photo Found it! This pic comes from the promotional poster of The Last Man On The Moon, a movie made in 2014. You'll notice they just cut the title off the picture Thought it was fimiliar ![]() http://123movies.to/film/the-last-man-on-the-moon-12611/ |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 07/15/16 12:17 PM
|
|
For all that followed the lunar missions i'm sure you must be aware of how many people were actually on the moon & what equipment so can you explain this photo, the reflection on the visor can answer a lot of questions & this is a real photo It may be a real photo taken at some point for promotion or whatever, perhaps from the filming of Capricorn One, but I'm sure if they were trying to perpetrate a fraud of that magnitude they would surely edit and not release such a blatant error for publication. They are rocket scientists after all ![]() http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/capricorn_one/ |
|
|
|
I think the problem is that we are not told enough..... not that it's fake, just not the whole truth |
|
|
|
Edited by
Sojourning_Soul
on
Fri 07/15/16 09:27 AM
|
|
Hillary signed on the dotted line — and then broke the law The non-disclosure agreement (NDA) is executed by all who have access to classified and sensitive information. It is beyond doubt that Hillary Clinton executed one of these while secretary of State. It is also beyond doubt that she violated her NDA, the “special confidence and trust” that such access confers, and the law. According to the U.S. Attorney’s Manual, Section 9-27.220, “Grounds for Commencing or Declining Prosecution,” Section A states: "The attorney for the government should commence or recommend Federal prosecution if he/she believes that the person's conduct constitutes a Federal offense and that the admissible evidence will probably be sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction, unless, in his/her judgment, prosecution should be declined because: No substantial Federal interest would be served by prosecution; The person is subject to effective prosecution in another jurisdiction; or There exists an adequate non-criminal alternative to prosecution." However, Section B further states: “The potential that — despite the law and the facts that create a sound, prosecutable case — the fact finder is likely to acquit the defendant because of the unpopularity of some factor involved in the prosecution or because of the overwhelming popularity of the defendant or his/her cause, is not a factor prohibiting prosecution. For example, in a civil rights case or a case involving an extremely popular political figure, it might be clear that the evidence of guilt — viewed objectively by an unbiased fact finder — would be sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction, yet the prosecutor might reasonably doubt whether the jury would convict. In such a case, despite his/her negative assessment of the likelihood of a guilty verdict (based on factors extraneous to an objective view of the law and the facts), the prosecutor may properly conclude that it is necessary and desirable to commence or recommend prosecution and allow the criminal process to operate in accordance with its principles.” Doesn’t this seems to conflict with the assessment by the director of the FBI that no U.S. attorney would prosecute this case? Doesn’t this conflict with the assessment of the attorney general in her testimony before Congress? http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-administration/287652-hillary-signed-on-the-dotted-line-and-then-broke-the |
|
|
|
Topic:
New France terror attack
|
|
He used a truck.... loaded with toy guns and inactive grenades in the back? WTF?! Had to get guns into the conversation somehow for the narrative I guess..... I mourn the deaths of so many in the actions of whomever is responsible for all these acts. I know..... on its face it is ISIS and the fools within who believe it is for a cause, 72 virgins, and a place in heaven, but until governments and leaders get a conscience and actually care about the people enough to actually do something to stop the madness instead of fuel, arm, and feed it with the media, to name the enemy, and take responsibility for their part in its creation for the wealth and power over the people it generates, nothing will change......EVER! ![]() |
|
|
|
All the world's a stage..... and everyone thinks themselves an actor or star while the puppet masters pull the strings of the media to create the script. Sad |
|
|