Boobs. Actually that's not an accurate answer. I think I'm more fascinated by the people who are fascinated by them, than by boobs themselves. I mean common...what's so attractive about two pieces of fat hanging off someone's chest? Why can't us ladies just grow them when we become pregnant & then have them go away after the nursing time is over? I wonder if Eve had boobs before she ate from the tree. Perhaps she didn't! Who could tell. After all, in all the paintings I've ever seen of her her back has been turned or hidden.

Question 1:

Does the type of music a person listens to reflect what they value?

Yes.... or No...


Second question:

If someone says: "If a person thinks your values can be reflected in the music you listen to.... they don't know what they are talking about."

Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Can anybody tell me what 150 to the power of 150 is... I don't have a graphics calculator handy.

Y has decided he can file an "orbach?" where he will resubmit the 36 points to all members of the appeals board for $3,500.00 & that he would be willing to take this to the Supreme Court without charge if the "orbach" is not sufficient. Taking the case to the Supreme Court usually costs abou $7,500.00 alone... Y said he will need the 3,500.00 immediately to get started. Please keep this in your prayers.

This is a shot in the dark - but any little bit will help. Please excuse length but there is no other way for me to communicate this need. In 2005 a missionary couple from my church was helping a woman (who we'll call V) find a place to live. She had moved from TN to MI because of "family legal issues", though she had just enough money to get to MI & no where to go, besides having a small scholarship to cover tuition at the local University. I so happened to have a spare room & was praying about what to do with it. When the missionary couple told me about V, she seemed like an immediate answer to prayer. I was shocked when I first met her. She is a beautiful & her demeanor radiated that of a woman with a great deal of intelligence& self respect. Though she would be too humble to admit it, V looks like superwoman with her tiny little ankles; wrists & super thick pitch black hair. She is older than me by a few years, very eloquent in her speech, professional & beautiful. Hardly someone you would picture to be in such a predicament. When I met her she had just returned from a job interview & was in a business suit.
After a few conversations in person we agreed to be roommates, became close (like sisters) & to this day are in regular correspondence. Confused at her situation, when I finally felt comfortable, I asked why such a smart, talented & beautiful lady like her was in such a rut & how she got there. As we sat together for two hours talking, tears ran down her face & she described what she had been through since 1995.

In 1995 she married a man we'll call Mr. M. He had been divorced (for reasons of infidelity on his ex-wife's part) for 4 years before marrying V. They had known each other for almost a year when they made the decision to wed. Mr. M had 3 children from his previous marriage who he had sole custody of. The children hadn't seen nor heard from their mother the entire span of four years. When V & Mr. M married, V wanted to move to Florida to be with some of her family members, which required Mr. M to move from Washington. He agreed to move, but his children were not happy about being "uprooted" because of his "new wife"...understandably. The oldest girl was living on her own already, but the second youngest girl wanted to stay in Washington because she didn't want to transfer away from friends. As soon as the ex-wife learned about the wedding, she went to Mr.M's family & began saying she never cheated. Mr.M's family, (being staunchly religious) decided then that it was wrong for Mr. M to divorce her, so they disowned him & began taking the ex-wife's side. This is unfortunate as, one (of the various) people she openly had a sexual relationship with was Mr. M's own brother! She then began demanding custody of the two remaining children. The youngest stayed with the father but the 2nd oldest was willing to go with her mother because it would mean she could stay in the same school. After a while, accusations were made against Mr. M by his daughter & this began the "legal issues". She claimed that her dad molested her. During the trial the daughter of Mr. M's brother wrote Mr. M's son various emails saying "uncle. M would NEVER do something like that". As the accusations were being put together, the daughter began to get careless with her words. Believing all pastor's must keep conversations "confidential" she bragged to one pastor about how it was all a lie. This pastor, knowing the truth, was willing to give up his position as pastor to testify to what this girl had told him & all 5 counts of CSC on this man were dropped.

Ironically, less than 7 months later, Mr. M's niece (the daughter of the brother whom had been sleeping with Mr. M's ex-wife during & after his marriage) came forward & said that he had done the same thing to her. She claimed that these things happened when she was 7 years old (at the time of accusations she was in her early to mid-teens). V, never having been in this situation, chose a lawyer to represent Mr. M out of the yellow pages (we'll call him X). At the initial trial the judge said that nothing could be said about the previous case (in which Mr. M was found not guilty), yet one of the very first questions the prosecutor posed in front of the jury to a witness was: "Are you aware of the previous charges held against Mr. M ?" X did not object to the question, until Mr. M asked "Are you going to object to that?" This usually would have resulted in a "mis-trial" because the jury would have been made prejudice at such a remark...yet the trial continued on after the judge simply told the jury to "disregard the question". Carrying on - X asked the girl (when she testified obviously) if she was in contact with former Ms.M & she responded "No" - though phone records indicated she spent sometimes up to three hours on the phone with former Ms.M - but X did not feel it necessary to present the phone logs as evidence. When Mr. M 's son presented the emails to X - where this same girl wrote the son stating, "Uncle M would NEVER do such a thing..." still X responded ("if I submit that as evidence I'll be laughed out of the courtroom!") So he did not present the email as evidence, though it was practically a confession to perjury. X did not get medical records. This niece was in & out of institutions where counseling took place weekly between the girls early teens & the times she made the accusations as a result of the trauma a broken relationship caused her when she found her boyfriend had impregnated another girl. During the time she received counseling, (she never indeed was molested) the counseling records would have shown that there was never any mention of Mr. M or any supposed molestation. How could she mention such things if they never happened, & she hadn't planned to fabricate till years later? It would make sense if she never mentioned Mr. M & such things it would be because they never took place! Yet the records were not "necessary" either to X to show that she had never mentioned such abuse. X never bothered to get such records.

At the end of this "circus" Mr. M was found GUILTY & was given a life sentence. Churches & those Mr. M had known all pulled together in excess of 23,000.00 to get Mr. M a new lawyer. This new lawyer, who we'll call Y, took an immediate interest in this case though V hardly had any money what so ever initially. Y came up with 36 points to prove that X was incompetent!

Upon questioning at a later hearing, X could not answer simple questions that would be difficult not to know for a civil attorney. He was not even familiar with well known cases that are often carried around with civil attorneys to court - because they are used so often. The appeals court unanymously found that Mr. M did NOT receive a fair trial. The story doesn't end there...

The appeal's court decision & a letter requesting a new trial was submitted to the judge. The judge refused providing Mr. M a new trial, writing (what should have been a 3 page response) a 12 page response, simply re-stating what the prosecutor had claimed from the beginning. This judge was publicly reprimanded by the appeals court for refusing Mr. M a new trial...but none the less without this judges agreement, the judges decision would have to be appealed.

After 5 years of being incarcerated Mr. M finally reached the appeals court again on January 6th 2009. Y presented the 36 points to this new panel in brief format & was able to mention 10 at the hearing. But now this panel decided unanimously that Mr. M DID receive a fair trial - writing a letter of explanation to Mr. M & Y stating that X indeed did have a "trial strategy" - when in fact it's quite clear he was incompetent. Only 7 points of 36 were in the letter of explanation, though even 10 were verbalized at the Jan, 6th hearing.

Now - after over 23,000.00 Mr. M still sits in a jail cell 5 years later, after giving up his house, everything they own & pleading with as many people as they can to help. STILL further actions needs to be taken.

In a phone conference today Mr. Y explained to both V & Mr. M that there are only two options left....The brief with the 36 points can be circulated to all the judicial members in the appeals court (instead of just 3 random) OR it can go to the Supreme Court.

Whatever is decided tomorrow at 2:30p.m. by V, Mr. M& Y... will have to be funded by mid-March.

I have taken the time to read through most every transcript V has kept. I have read the letter of explanation from the appeals court & though I'm no law scholar - it's plain to me & all those who support Mr. M that he is innocent.

Had Mr. M just plead no contest - he would have been released by now (most likely). The only way he can get out in 20 years is if he "shows remorse". How can a man who has not committed this crime show remorse? X tried to convince Mr. M to lie saying "you'll get two or three years & this will all be over with" . Mr. M’s response: “I didn’t do this… it’s all or nothing” Mr. M refused to lie & has maintained his innocence to this day.

Mr. M has his Masters of divinity & is an ordained Pastor. He was working on getting his second Masters in Business Management when such accusations arose. He was once a very wealthy man who owned & operated a Christian Radio Station & Christian Printing press out of his own home with a small fleet of staff. Many of his previous employees still are in touch with him today & some have invested thousands of dollars into helping him. Some have even been willing to testify to the fact that his house was always open & the type of work that went on there would never have allowed the house to be unoccupied. Even all the bedroom doors were always kept open.

Though he was placed in a level 5 (which is maximum security) Mr. M is now at a level 2. He has never once had any infractions, despite having his life threatened multiple times by numerous people, both by gangs & individuals. Mr. M has been "sliced" more than once with razor blades & other "home-made" weapons - as CSC's are looked at as worse than murderers in prison.

Mr. M recently accepted a job as a clerk at the Cor. Fac. & was elected inmate representative by all the inmates at his current facility. As a result of wanting to learn more about the law so he can understand what needs to be done for him to be fairly represented, he has helped many inmates with legal documentation, free of charge & as a result, some have gained new trials, have had their convictions changed & some have been released.

Mr. M also has lead many to Christ while in prison & now receives letters from inmates & past inmates from the various Corr. Fac. he's been in. The truth of the matter is... Mr. M needs prayers & support. The more people who know about his situation the better. If you want to look up Mr. M 's appeals history, I will be more than happy to provide you the necessary information to see his history. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to answer them.

V herself has stuck with Mr. M the entire time, despite that Mr. M has been locked up the majority of their marriage. Just last week she traveled over 6 hours to visit Mr. M when he found out about the Appeal's decision to offer him comfort & words of encouragement.

Your prayers are desperately needed. If you would like to learn more ways regarding how you can support Mr. M 's cause, please send me an email. Thank you for enduring this long entry. Your prayers & support are greatly appreciated. Rhonda

This is a shot in the dark - but any little bit will help. Please excuse length but there is no other way for me to communicate this need. In 2005 a missionary couple from my church was helping a woman (who we'll call V) find a place to live. She had moved from TN to MI because of "family legal issues", though she had just enough money to get to MI & no where to go, besides having a small scholarship to cover tuition at the local University. I so happened to have a spare room & was praying about what to do with it. When the missionary couple told me about V, she seemed like an immediate answer to prayer. I was shocked when I first met her. She is a beautiful & her demeanor radiated that of a woman with a great deal of intelligence& self respect. Though she would be too humble to admit it, V looks like superwoman with her tiny little ankles; wrists & super thick pitch black hair. She is older than me by a few years, very eloquent in her speech, professional & beautiful. Hardly someone you would picture to be in such a predicament. When I met her she had just returned from a job interview & was in a business suit. After a few conversations in person we agreed to be roommates, became close (like sisters) & to this day are in regular correspondence. Confused at her situation, when I finally felt comfortable, I asked why such a smart, talented & beautiful lady like her was in such a rut & how she got there. As we sat together for two hours talking, tears ran down her face & she described what she had been through since 1995. In 1995 she married a man we'll call Mr. M. He had been divorced (for reasons of infidelity on his ex-wife's part)for 4 years before marrying V. They had known each other for almost a year when they made the decision to wed. Mr. M had 3 children from his previous marriage who he had sole custody of. The children hadn't seen nor heard from their mother the entire span of four years. When V & Mr. M married, V wanted to move to Florida to be with some of her family members, which required Mr. M to move from Washington. He agreed to move, but his children were not happy about being "uprooted" because of his "new wife"...understandably. The oldest girl was living on her own already, but the second youngest girl wanted to stay in Washington because she didn't want to transfer away from friends. As soon as the ex-wife learned about the wedding, she went to T's family & began saying she never cheated. T's family, (being staunchly religious) decided then that it was wrong for Mr. M to divorce her, so they disowned him & began taking the ex-wife's side. This is unfortunate as, one (of the various) people she openly had a sexual relationship with was his own brother! She then began demanding custody of the two remaining children. The youngest stayed with the father but the 2nd oldest was willing to go with her mother because it would mean she could stay in the same school. After a while, accusations were made against Mr. M by his daughter & this began the "legal issues". She claimed that her dad molested her. During the trial the daughter of T's brother wrote T's son various emails saying "uncle. M would NEVER do something like that". As the accusations were being put together, the daughter began to get careless with her words. Believing all pastor's must keep conversations "confidential" she bragged to one pastor about how it was all a lie. This pastor, knowing the truth, was willing to give up his position as pastor to testify to what this girl had told him & all 5 counts of CSC on this man were dropped. Ironically, less than 7 months later, T's niece (the daughter of the brother whom had been sleeping with T's ex-wife during & after his marriage) came forward & said that he had done the same thing to her. She claimed that these things happened when she was 7 years old (at the time of accusations she was in her early to mid-teens). V, never having been in this situation, chose a lawyer to represent Mr. M out of the yellow pages (we'll call him X). At the initial trial the judge said that nothing could be said about the previous case (in which Mr. M was found not guilty), yet one of the very first questions the prosecutor posed in front of the jury to a witness was: "Are you aware of the previous charges held against Mr. M ?" X did not object to the question, until Mr. M asked "Are you going to object to that?" This usually would have allowed the door to be open to discuss the other case, but the judge simply told the jury to "ignore the question". X asked the girl if she was in contact with former Ms.M& she responded "No" - though phone records indicated she spend sometimes up to three hours on the phone with former Ms.M- but X did not feel it necessary to present the phone logs as evidence. When Mr. M 's son presented the emails to Mr. X - where this same girl wrote him stating, "Uncle M would NEVER do such a thing.." still X responded ("if I submit that as evidence I'll be laughed out of the courtroom!") So he did not present the email as evidence, though it was practically a confession to perjury. X did not get medical records. Even though this girl was in & out of institutions where counseling took place weekly between the ages of 7 & the times she made the accusations, counseling records were not "necessary" either to X to show that she had never mentioned such abuse. At the end of this "circus" Mr. M was found GUILTY & was given a life sentence. Churches & those Mr. M had known all pulled together in excess of 23,000.00 to get this man a new lawyer. This lawyer, who we'll call Y, took an immediate interest in this case. He came up with 36 points to prove that X was incompetent! Upon questioning at a later hearing, X could not answer simple questions that would be difficult not to know for a civil lawyer. He was not even familiar with well known cases that are often referred to in most civil cases. The case was appealed & a panel of 3 judged found that T___ did NOT receive a fair trial. The story doesn't end there... A Brief was submitted to the judge to request a new trial. But the judge refused writing (what should have been a 3 page response) a 12 page response, simply re-stating what the prosecutor had claimed. In order for Mr. M to get a new trial he needed that approval, so then he had to APPEAL the judges decision. After 5 years of being incarcerated Mr. M finally reached the appeals court again on January 6th. Y presented the 36 points to this new panel, but now this panel decided he DID receive a fair trial - writing a letter of explanation to Mr. M & Y stating that X indeed did have a "trial strategy" - when in fact it's quite clear he was incompetent. Now - after over 23,000.00 Mr. M still sits in a jail cell 5 years later, after giving up his house, everything they own & pleading with as many people as they can to help... & further actions STILL need to be taken. In a phone conference today Mr. Y explained to both V &Mr. M that there are two options.... The brief with the 36 points can be circulated to all the judicial members on the panel (instead of just 3 random) OR it can go to the Supreme Court. Whatever is decided tomorrow at 2:30p.m. by V, Mr. M& Y... will have to be funded by mid-March. I have taken the time to read through most every transcript that V has kept on file. I have read the letter of explanation from the appeals court & though I'm no law scholar - it's plain to me & all those who support Mr. M that he is innocent. Had Mr. M just plead no contest - he would have been released by now (most likely). The only way he can get out in 20 years is if he "shows remorse". How can a man who has not committed this crime show remorse? X tried to convince Mr. M to lie saying "you'll get two or three years & this will all be over with" . Mr. M’s response: “I didn’t do this… it’s all or nothing” Mr. M refused to lie & has maintained his innocence to this day. Mr. M has his masters of divinity & is an ordained pastor. He was working on getting his second Masters in business management when such accusations arose. He was once a very wealthy man who owned & operated a Christian Radio Station & Christian Printing press out of his own home with a small fleet of staff. Though he was placed in a level 5 (which is maximum security) he is now at a level 2 because he has never once done anything while incarcerated to show he needed such security. He recently accepted a job as a clerk at the Cor. Fac. & was elected inmate representative by all the inmates at his current facility. As a result of wanting to learn more about the law so he can understand what needs to be done for him to be fairly represented, he has helped many inmates with legal documentation, free of charge & as a result, some have gained new trials, have had their convictions changed & some have been released. Mr. M also has lead many to Christ while in prison & now receives letters from inmates & past inmates from the various Corr. Fac. he's been in. The truth of the matter is... Mr. M needs prayers & support. The more people who know about his situation the better. If you want to look up Mr. M 's appeals history, I will be more than happy to provide you the necessary information to see his history. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to answer them. V herself has stuck with Mr. M the entire time, despite that Mr. M has been locked up the majority of their marriage. Your prayers are desperately needed. If you would like to learn more ways regarding how you can support Mr. M 's cause, please send me an email. Thank you for enduring this long entry. Your prayers & support are greatly appreciated. Rhonda

This is a shot in the dark - but any little bit will help. Please excuse length but there is no other way for me to communicate this need.

In 2005 a missionary couple from my church was helping a woman (who we'll call V__ ) find a place to live. She had moved from TN to MI because of "family legal issues", though she had just enough money to get to MI & no where to go, besides having a small scholarship to cover tuition at the local University. I so happened to have a spare room & was praying about what to do with it. When the missionary couple told me about V___, she seemed like an immediate answer to prayer. I was shocked when I first met her. She is a beautiful & her demeanor radiated that of a woman with a great deal of intelligence& self respect. Though she would be too humble to admit it, V___ looks like superwoman with her tiny little ankles, wrists & super thick pitch black hair. She is older than me by a few years, very eloquent in her speech, professional & beautiful. Hardly someone you would picture to be in such a predicament.

When I met her she had just returned from a job interview & was in a business suit. After a few conversations in person we agreed to be roommates, became close (like sisters) & to this day are in regular correspondence.

Confused at her situation, when I finally felt comfortable, I asked why such a smart, talented & beautiful lady like her was in such a rut & how she got there. As we sat together for two hours talking, tears ran down her face & she described what she had been through since 1995.

In 1995 she married a man we'll call T___. He had been divorced (for reasons of infidelity on his ex-wife's part)for 4 years before marrying V. They had known each other for almost a year when they made the decision to wed. T__ had 3 children from his previous marriage who he had sole custody of. The children hadn't seen nor heard from their mother the entire span of four years. When V & T married, V wanted to move to Florida to be with some of her family members, which required T to move from Washington. He agreed to move, but his children were not happy about being "uprooted" because of his "new wife"...understandably. The oldest girl was on her own already, but the second youngest girl wanted to stay in Washington because she didn't want to transfer away from friends. As soon as the ex-wife learned about the wedding, she went to T's family & began saying she never cheated. T's family, (being staunchly religious) decided then that it was wrong for T to divorce her, so they disowned him & began taking the ex-wife's side. This is unfortunate as, one (of the various) people she openly had a sexual relationship with was his own brother! She then began demanding custody of the two remaining children. The youngest stayed with the father but the 2nd oldest was willing to go with her mother because it would mean she could stay in the same school.

After a while, accusations were made against T by his daughter & this began the "legal issues". She claimed that her dad molested her. During the trial the daughter of T's brother wrote T's son various emails saying "uncle T would NEVER do something like that". As the accusations were being put together, the daughter began to get careless with her words. Believing all pastor's must keep conversations "confidential" she bragged to one pastor about how it was all a lie. This pastor, knowing the truth, was willing to give up his position as pastor to testify to what this girl had told him & all 5 counts of CSC on this man were dropped. Ironically, less than 7 months later, T's niece (the daughter of the brother whom had been sleeping with T's ex-wife during & after his marriage) came forward & said that he had done the same thing to her. She claimed that these things happened when she was 7 years old (at the time of accusations she was in her early to mid-teens). V, never having been in this situation, chose a lawyer to represent T out of the yellow pages (we'll call him X___). At the initial trial the judge said that nothing could be said about the previous case (in which T was found not guilty), yet one of the very first questions the prosecutor posed in front of the jury to a witness was: "Are you aware of the previous charges held against Mr. T?" X did not object to the question, until Mr. T asked "Are you going to object to that?" This usually would have allowed the door to be open to discuss the other case, but the judge simply told the jury to "ignore the question". X asked the girl if she was in contact with former Ms. T & she responded "No" - though phone records indicated she spend sometimes up to three hours on the phone with former Ms. T - but X did not feel it necessary to present the phone logs as evidence. When Mr. T's son presented the emails to Mr. X - where this same girl wrote him stating, "Uncle T would NEVER do such a thing.." still X responded ("if I submit that as evidence I'll be laughed out of the courtroom!") So he did not present the email as evidence, though it was practically a confession to perjury. X did not get medical records. Even though this girl was in & out of institutions where counseling took place weekly between the ages of 7 & the times she made the accusations, counseling records were not "necessary" either to X to show that she had never mentioned such abuse. At the end of this "circus" Mr. T was found GUILTY & was given a life sentence.

Churches & those Mr. T had known all pulled together in excess of 23,000.00 to get this man a new lawyer. This lawyer, who we'll call Y, took an immediate interest in this case. He came up with 36 points to prove that X was incompetent! Upon questioning at a later hearing, X could not answer simple questions that would be difficult not to know for a civil lawyer. He was not even familiar with well known cases that are often referred to in most civil cases. The case was appealed & a panel of 3 judged found that T___ did NOT receive a fair trial. The story doesn't end there...

A Brief was submitted to the judge to request a new trial. But the judge refused writing (what should have been a 3 page response) a 12 page response, simply re-stating what the prosecutor had claimed. In order for T to get a new trial he needed that approval, so then he had to APPEAL the judges decision. After 5 years of being incarcerated Mr. T finally reached the appeals court again on January 6th. Y presented the 36 points to this new panel, but now this panel decided he DID receive a fair trial - writing a letter of explanation to Mr. T & Y stating that X indeed did have a "trial strategy" - when in fact it's quite clear he was incompetent.

Now - after over 23,000.00 Mr. T still sits in a jail cell 5 years later, after giving up his house, everything they own & pleading with as many people as they can to help... & further actions STILL need to be taken.

In a phone conference today Mr. Y explained to both V & T that there are two options.... The brief with the 36 points can be circulated to all the judicial members on the panel (instead of just 3 random) OR it can go to the Supreme Court. Whatever is decided tomorrow at 2:30p.m. by V, T & Y... will have to be funded by mid-March.

I have taken the time to read through most every transcript that V has kept on file. I have read the letter of explanation from the appeals court & though I'm no law scholar - it's plain to me & all those who support Mr. T that he is innocent. Had Mr. T just plead no contest - he would have been released by now (most likely). The only way he can get out in 20 years is if he "shows remorse". How can a man who has not committed this crime show remorse? X tried to convince Mr. T to lie saying "you'll get two or three years & this will all be over with" - but Mr. T refused to lie & has maintained his innocence to this day.

Mr.T has his masters of divinity & is an ordained pastor. He was working on getting his second Masters in business management when such accusations arose. He was once a very wealthy man who owned & operated a Christian Radio Station & Christian Printing press out of his own home with a small fleet of staff. Though he was placed in a level 5 (which is maximum security) he is now at a level 2 because he has never once done anything while incarcerated to show he needed such security. He recently accepted a job as a clerk at the Cor. Fac. & was elected inmate representative by all the inmates at his current facility. As a result of wanting to learn more about the law so he can understand what needs to be done for him to be fairly represented, he has helped many inmates with legal documentation, free of charge & as a result, some have gained new trials, have had their convictions changed & some have been released. Mr. T also has lead many to Christ while in prison & now receives letters from inmates & past inmates from the various Corr. Fac. he's been in.

The truth of the matter is... Mr.T needs prayers & support. The more people who know about his situation the better. If you want to look up Mr. T's appeals history, I will be more than happy to provide you the necessary information to see his history. If you have any questions, I would be more than happy to answer them. V herself has stuck with Mr. T the entire time, despite that Mr. T has been locked up the majority of their marriage. Your prayers are desperately needed. If you would like to learn more ways regarding how you can support Mr. T's cause, please send me an email.

Thank you for enduring this long entry. Your prayers & support are greatly appreciated.

Rhonda

Today I was exposed to some of your poetry for the first time & I just wanted to thank you for sharing. I praise God for the talent He has given you & for the ministry of encouragement He has given you. May he be glorified in everything we do.

Rhonda

I needed some inspiration & some time to think about what to say in sharing my testimony.

This link provided me encouragement, was educational, helpful & has given me the insight in regard to what to include. Here is the link. Hopefully I will have my testimony submitted tomorrow.

http://www.amazingfacts.org/FreeStuff/OnlineLibrary/tabid/106/ctl/ViewMedia/mid/447/IID/66/LNG/en/7/From-Stress-to-Joy/SC/R/Default.aspx

Enjoy!

If female soldiers looked like that in real life - we'd loose our front line as a result of dehydration from drooling men - in addition to being shot at by the enemy for reason of distraction at close range. Secondly, even female Marines are not permitted to be in infantry so good luck finding on who can do anything more than dis-assemble & re-assemble an AK47 or M16A2. Thirdly... yes I agree with you - woman should indeed be familiar with engines... at least enough to guarantee they won't get ripped off at the shop by men who intentionally tell them that the wrong parts need replaced or that something that works doesn't.

As you will learn, if you already haven't women are master compensators. For those of us who aren't cartoons I'd like to think we at least make an effort, for those who can't handle riffle I'd like to think they could at least cook a decent meal for those who can and for those who don't know their way around an engine, I'd like to think they are smart enough to take a man with them when they go to the shop for repairs - to ensure everything is dealt with professionally.

I think many loose site of the fact that - with every choice we make were are also making a statement: that what we are choosing to do right now is the best thing we think there is to spend time on - out of all options."

If we stopped to ask ourselves... "Could I be doing something better?" This world would be a different place.

Make eye contact then move your lips like you're talking when the music is really loud - while they are looking at you. They'll naturally be drawn to you & you will have naturally pointed out a problem... that you can't think straight in that environment. You can ask them to go outside...but not by the smokers, as it was pointed out...the smokers may be waiting there to draw "common interest" & you don't want to give your catch away just yet. Find a quiet environment & you can thank her for "rescuing you from all the noise". You'll make her feel like a hero right off the bat & line yourself up to shower her with complements.

"Without all the smoke, flashing lights and darkness all around...I just realized how gorgeous you are! To think a pretty/handsome guy/lady like you would rescue me from such... I'm speechless" Of coarse that's then your cue to shut up & let them talk from then on out.

OR you can just be creative & pull something out of your ear like I just did... despite that I haven't been to a club since Prince was saying he wanted to "party like it's nineteen ninety nine." -- ANYWAY... Enjoy this advice!

actually...I wouldn't suggest masturbation, because it is scientifically proven that it only increases the sex drive. It treats the symptoms but doesn't get rid of the underlying problem. In fact... if you did masturbate your balls technically could become even bluer... so to speak.

Here is my advice...take it for what it is. Try Mindurbation...yes.. urbanizing your mind of all the traffic by thinking on things that are pure...and good and holy instead. If you do that the devil whose turning your balls blue will go away & you won't have the problem anymore... you'll just be, what is that forgotten word? ABSTINENT long enough for wiffey wiffey to come around as a blessing from God as a result of such a pure mind!

Those who suggested masturbation...notice how they are all single. Gee... I guess they haven't fleed from the devil yet!

Don't let them fool you...they are all satan's agents with human face.

Adam...Adam...Adam... sigh... - I thought we agreed to keep this between me & you?


(blame the soldierofamerica... he put me up to saying this about 2 pages ago).


Regarding your situation - I don't think this girl intentionally was trying to give you mixed signals. If you have any feelings for her still - I would suggest you make those feelings known (as you seem to have no problem expressing your sensitive side). The deal is this... as a sales-person I know that the average "Prospect" usually objects to getting the product 6 times... so if you "close" 7 times...you'll get yourself a deal.

If she says, "I don't know if we are compatible" ask her why. For EVERY REASON she gives you, CONSIDER it a challenge! She is begging you for the "Sale"! She wants you to talk her into the goods!

When the "because's" end... & it finally gets down to "NO! I AM NOT INTERESTED!" and she refuses to give you any more reasons ONLY then should the propaganda end! This is not being desperate as some of the other single (for a reason) people will tell you on here... this is SALES! So sell yourself!

Response coming...

Kibbieditchen? That's kind of a "mixed" complement...what does everyone else think? Oh! And GM4N - how much do you charge for this positivity? Go easy on me... sugar & spice & everything nice is different than gold & I can't be made of all 4!

Back on Topic: - I found these online:
Mixed signal #1: She always says yes when you ask her out—as long as it's on a weeknight.

Mixed signal #2: She says she just wants to be friends and then kisses you.

Mixed signal #3: He says he wants to be exclusive but refuses to introduce you as his girlfriend.

Anyone have any others?

Ha! Hilarious.

FYI - have not spoken to this guy in years - but recently learned of the back door compliments.

You guys are SO fun that it makes me want to fabricate, just to see how you'd react to more! Am I allowed to type that on this national forum? (all previous examples were 100% true)

Common! Am I the only one that has ever received mixed signals from soldierofamerica? (That part is not true. If it were I'm sure the mixed signals would have been much more enjoyable ti endure - as at least he has a sense of humor).

How come no one else is admitting to dealing with mixed signals?.... (crickets chirping in the background).

Rhonda

A few more to keep you entertained....

Tries advising you not to hang out with another guy (whose a decent long term friend) for reasons of "standards of friendship should be higher" when his friends are even worse.

Asks you to help him with something, but when you do refuses your help.

Famous one: Says, "I can't talk to you anymore" because my (new, lame) girlfriend gave me an ultimatum.

Says new relationship "is not serious" but then goes & spends more than $300 dollars to buy her a mut-dog when times are tight.

I'm sure I'll think of some more. Please feel free to share your mixed signals too.

: