I do have a "pet peeve" that I would like to address; I think it is very rude when someone sends you a note or letter and you do not care to respond to them. It is a matter of respect and integrity when someone takes the time to write you, you should at least have the same respect toward them. That is what you wish for, is it not? So, please, if I write to you, have the courtesy to write back, even if it just to say; "Thank you, but no Thank you!"

It sound to me like the brake light switch on the brake pedal is worn out and you either need a new on or to adjust the one that is there.

Look under the brake pedal and see if it is making contact with the pedal when it is no being pressed down, then if it is not have a local mechanic or friend just replace it. It is very simple and should take no more than 10 - 15 minutes.

Good luck.

My Dear Young Lady;

I would like to add my input to some of the remarks that you have been getting and maybe some advice of my own. I am a combat serviceman (USMC) and I wish to tell you that there was a lot of things both good and bad going on over there. One of the I am afraid to say, was playing 'Head Games' with the young ladies back home. Saying that they wanted to meet with ladies like yourself when they got 'Home', but really know that they were not going to. I am not saying that this person was in fact playing head games with you, but it does go on. So, please do not feel bad about yourself, feel bad for him for treating young ladies, like yourself this way. As for a few of the comments, 'Dinners Ready, when do we eat.....' or some of the other insensitive remarks that were made. They seem to be in worse shape than this person is. I am very sorry that you have been treated this way, but it does happen. Please just learn from this and keep going. There are gentlemen out here of 'Honor and Integrity'. Please keep looking, yours is out here. My best to you.

WHAT?

The same amount of time it takes that half chicken to lat a quarter egg!

Subject: Fw: THIS IS SCARY WAKE UP AMERICA !!



Subject: This is really scary!]


The trends in law seem sufficiently important to warrant circulating this email. As population densities grow, it becomes more difficult to avoid stepping on others toes. More people implies more control whether justified or not. Nevertheless, there remain some responsibilities which we ourselves must bear. Short of Alzheimer's disease, some responsibilities remain ours. The "watchers" cannot and will not do it all.

==============================


It is now closer to reality than you think. You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows.

<>One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble. <>


In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few That are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered. Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.


<>"What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.


<> "Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven." <>

<>The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them. Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both "victims" have been arrested numerous times. But the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die." The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type pranksters. As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.
<>
Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably win. The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.


<>A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works against you. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.

<>The judge sentences you to life in prison. <>


This case really happened.
<>

On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk, England, killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term.
<>
<>How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great British Empire?

<>It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to those who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns. <>


<>Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns.
<>
Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.
<>

The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)
<>Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.

<>For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, sealed the fate of the few sidearms still owned by private citizens.

<> During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released.


<>Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."

All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times and several elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars. <>


<> When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply. Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens.

<>How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. Kinda like cars.

<> Sound familiar?


<>WAKE UP AMERICA; THIS IS WHY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS PUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT IN OUR CONSTITUTION.


<> "..It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."



--Samuel Adams



If you think this is important, please forward to everyone you know.



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.552 / Virus Database



New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines.

I am looking for those person's who may be able to critique my profile and give me some honest suggestions.

I am getting spurodic mail and when I send out replies either these person's fail to get them or are playing head games in the first place. I do not feel it is me or my profile, but I would like to check and see what you all think.

Thanks!