a relationship (rp) is where you pretend to be better than you are so she can fall in love with who you really are.

a typical rp is the strongest case i know in support of pessimism about humanity.

welcome.

age diff irrelevant.

long-distance (at any age) is a disaster. cut your losses and buy local.

Yes. tragically, this does not mean they are as sexual. Meaning, the romance can be alot of pomp and circumstance about nothing.

if you still wanna be with her after you whack your junk, it's love.

any girl who asks 'where are all the nice guys" deserves no less than the misery she gets.

revenge is so very very sweet.

see below for answer:
http://www.craigslist.org/about/best/lax/483318927.html

I have $ome idea$, but admittedly I'm not $ure. Perhap$ it is $ome confidence (ju$tified or not doe$ not $eem to matter), look$, $ocial $tatus and a $en$e of humor.

But I think there'$ another variable that'$ mi$$ing.

i see a potential problem with some of these "infinite possibility, so eventually even the most unlikely event/universe will occur". consider:

in a parallel/bubble/infinite/daughter universe, two coin flips come up exactly heads. much less likely, 2 million coins all heads. much lessssss likely all coins ever flipped. much less likely, all coins & quantum mechanics allowing every *law* to be broken.

so the timeline traced by such a universe would be one with no discernible laws. however unlikely, if there is some possibility of houses levitating, water falling up, all coins landing up endless trillions of times, etc... what would such a "universe" look like? how would one identify it as such?

what "laws of nature" and "universe" could one discern if, necessarily existing somewhere within an infinite probability curve, every "magical" thing happened because "in an infinite realm, all events, however unlikely, must happen".

an unlikely, but inevitable timeline that looks like every magic trick seemingly possible (round pegs going into square holes because, hey, quantum mechanics states there's a chance...) implies not only ONE nonsensical universe, but an infinite number of them.

and if so...couldn't "our" universe be the one ridiculously unlikely, with the "laws of nature that we know" being merely insanely unlikely coincidences of other, vastly different and inconceivable "real laws"?

my point: without something that can be falsified, it's not science, it's shiny guesswork. and "infinity + probability = everything" is not the way to falsifiable hypothesis, but a loophole that allows every fantasy

(after all, in all of infinity, one can't categorically exclude Alice talking to a floating cat...)

enough is enough when it's not too much, but not too little. properly apportioned and cut to precision. don't forget to factor in wind resistance.

3rd rule of girls:
denial & dissimulation.

:/

first rule of girls:
any who is "looking for a good man" had many good men at her beck and call but instead chose to slut it out with "bad boys" and jocks and such until she got too old/loose for their taste.

second rule of girls:
any who "does not want to play games", plays games like crazy.

Thanks for the tips. i admit it was a bit forced. i was not laughing at the moment, just thinking "k gotta look *friendly*". i was worried like coming off as the guy version of overly attached girlfriend.

^now that is blunt and informative. thank you.

hmm

happy Bday.

to be honest, you do not come off as attractive. You appear overly slutty. (there's a difference). if guys email you asking to casually hook up without any relationship-talk, don't be surprised. that is the exact message you send out.

based on your profile as i saw it (on evening of Dec 1), I would not talk to you or consider dating you. you seem too ditzy, shallow, and not someone i could trust or respect.


i dont mean to be rude, and i wouldn't be if your profile merited different. i know i am far from perfect, and have way too many flaws. so i do not say any of this out of arrogance or "talking down". no.

having said that, i can't honestly tell you that "you're great" based on your mingle profile.

write 10-30 of such poems, dont publicize them until they're all done and fine-tuned.

put em in an ebook. you might make some money, you might not. but here, you definitely won't.

government naturally appears. it is not "for" anything, despite governments' claims to be "for justice" or "for order", "security", etc... it is same as coldness is not "for" ice in any way. coldness does not serve ice, nor does it dominate it. coldness is a property of ice (or else ice would melt). likewise, government of one kind or another is an emergent property of social creatures like humans. it is inevitable.

seriously? thank you! i know the caps thing, that's my little grammatical lazyness. if it's unofficial, i usually don't cap. pobody's nerfect, and all that.

i usually stay off the forums, but maybe i'll be a bit more active now that i have some feedback from such wonderful ladies as yourself.

and yea... lighting... i need a better camera :)

welcome to mingle. the guy who created this also runs theoatmeal.com, so you know this is a quality site.

just discovered this "rate my profile" feature. what the hey.
dont hold back criticism, but on the flip side, dont be shy about pointing out any merits either. thank you! :)