1. Infinite Universes
Scientists can’t be sure what the shape of space-time is, but most likely, it’s flat (as opposed to spherical or even donut-shape) and stretches out infinitely. But if space-time goes on forever, then it must start repeating at some point, because there are a finite number of ways particles can be arranged in space and time.

So if you look far enough, you would encounter another version of you — in fact, infinite versions of you. Some of these twins will be doing exactly what you’re doing right now, while others will have worn a different sweater this morning, and still others will have made vastly different career and life choices.

Because the observable universe extends only as far as light has had a chance to get in the 13.7 billion years since the Big Bang (that would be 13.7 billion light-years), the space-time beyond that distance can be considered to be its own separate universe. In this way, a multitude of universes exists next to each other in a giant patchwork quilt of universes. [Visualizations of Infinity: A Gallery]

2. Bubble Universes
In addition to the multiple universes created by infinitely extending space-time, other universes could arise from a theory called “eternal inflation.” Inflation is the notion that the universe expanded rapidly after the Big Bang, in effect inflating like a balloon. Eternal inflation, first proposed by Tufts University cosmologist Alexander Vilenkin, suggests that some pockets of space stop inflating, while other regions continue to inflate, thus giving rise to many isolated “bubble universes.”

Thus, our own universe, where inflation has ended, allowing stars and galaxies to form, is but a small bubble in a vast sea of space, some of which is still inflating, that contains many other bubbles like ours. And in some of these bubble universes, the laws of physics and fundamental constants might be different than in ours, making some universes strange places indeed.

3. Parallel Universes
Another idea that arises from string theory is the notion of “braneworlds” — parallel universes that hover just out of reach of our own, proposed by Princeton University’s Paul Steinhardt and Neil Turok of the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Ontario, Canada. The idea comes from the possibility of many more dimensions to our world than the three of space and one of time that we know. In addition to our own three-dimensional “brane” of space, other three-dimensional branes may float in a higher-dimensional space.

Columbia University physicist Brian Greene describes the idea as the notion that “our universe is one of potentially numerous ‘slabs’ floating in a higher-dimensional space, much like a slice of bread within a grander cosmic loaf,” in his book “The Hidden Reality” (Vintage Books, 2011).

A further wrinkle on this theory suggests these brane universes aren’t always parallel and out of reach. Sometimes, they might slam into each other, causing repeated Big Bangs that reset the universes over and over again. [The Universe: Big Bang to Now in 10 Easy Steps ]

4. Daughter Universes
The theory of quantum mechanics, which reigns over the tiny world of subatomic particles, suggests another way multiple universes might arise. Quantum mechanics describes the world in terms of probabilities, rather than definite outcomes. And the mathematics of this theory might suggest that all possible outcomes of a situation do occur — in their own separate universes. For example, if you reach a crossroads where you can go right or left, the present universe gives rise to two daughter universes: one in which you go right, and one in which you go left.

“And in each universe, there’s a copy of you witnessing one or the other outcome, thinking — incorrectly — that your reality is the only reality,” Greene wrote in “The Hidden Reality.”

5. Mathematical Universes
Scientists have debated whether mathematics is simply a useful tool for describing the universe, or whether math itself is the fundamental reality, and our observations of the universe are just imperfect perceptions of its true mathematical nature. If the latter is the case, then perhaps the particular mathematical structure that makes up our universe isn’t the only option, and in fact all possible mathematical structures exist as their own separate universes.

“A mathematical structure is something that you can describe in a way that’s completely independent of human baggage,” said Max Tegmark of MIT, who proposed this brain-twistin gidea. “I really believe that there is this universe out there that can exist independently of me that would continue to exist even if there were no humans.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oFUgMXVj0js
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxgN0Ente30vc

two S. Hwaking videos

Thanks for sharing this Mighty, some of this reminds me of the show Fringe, pretty good show. I have to say its highly impossible for another version of anything out in another dimension/universe exists. Reason why being cause creation is Infinite in itself and there are possible outcomes running all over the place at any given time... so to think there are multiple universes coexisting simultaneously with different versions of me is pretty absurd... you can have all the PHDs in the world and make it sound complicated and true but the matter of fact is that scientists are full of it.

Thought I'd add two cents ;)

Thank you for sharing the Videos too!

i see a potential problem with some of these "infinite possibility, so eventually even the most unlikely event/universe will occur". consider:

in a parallel/bubble/infinite/daughter universe, two coin flips come up exactly heads. much less likely, 2 million coins all heads. much lessssss likely all coins ever flipped. much less likely, all coins & quantum mechanics allowing every *law* to be broken.

so the timeline traced by such a universe would be one with no discernible laws. however unlikely, if there is some possibility of houses levitating, water falling up, all coins landing up endless trillions of times, etc... what would such a "universe" look like? how would one identify it as such?

what "laws of nature" and "universe" could one discern if, necessarily existing somewhere within an infinite probability curve, every "magical" thing happened because "in an infinite realm, all events, however unlikely, must happen".

an unlikely, but inevitable timeline that looks like every magic trick seemingly possible (round pegs going into square holes because, hey, quantum mechanics states there's a chance...) implies not only ONE nonsensical universe, but an infinite number of them.

and if so...couldn't "our" universe be the one ridiculously unlikely, with the "laws of nature that we know" being merely insanely unlikely coincidences of other, vastly different and inconceivable "real laws"?

my point: without something that can be falsified, it's not science, it's shiny guesswork. and "infinity + probability = everything" is not the way to falsifiable hypothesis, but a loophole that allows every fantasy

(after all, in all of infinity, one can't categorically exclude Alice talking to a floating cat...)

i kind of agree, our biggest problem is that we have a limited FOV... the rest is based on mathematics and speculation.. i can't really say whats beyond our FOV, but it seems like pretty much the same as what we can see...

Right... we humans in general are still very limited in our understanding and vision that we tend to rely too heavily on "technology" or to what the "leaders" of this planet say in the media. That we tend to dismiss the fact that we have the potential and capability in ourselves to discover the answers... I have to say the answers will lead to the beginning of the end to many things on the planet.

al gore and global waring convinced me of that...lol

I don't think most ppl are even slightly aware of the effects global warming is having on the oceans ecosystems and our climate..So Lets thank the world wide media for that and Apple for that matter. :l