Community > Posts By > Wave

 
no photo
Wed 06/16/21 01:00 AM
I do not think there is a rule, all depends from what you are looking for anf what you value most in a relationship:

if filling your faily agenda and routine physical contact is your first need, then distance is surely a problem.

if you have your own life and having a close partner to build an intimate relatiionship is your wish...then surely distance is not the first worry

and needs change with time....this is why having a life time partner is a gift that not all of us are really ready (or willing) to take, less and less.




no photo
Mon 06/14/21 11:28 AM
i think there is the same difference you can appreciate tasting a real pizza made in Naples and a pretending to italian one you can see everywhere.... Beautiful is invisible to eyes

no photo
Mon 06/14/21 01:00 AM
most people wants love but don't know what love is

and this is the topic-), i think all definitions may work...all but one: love has nothing to do with possession, control and ego.

no photo
Sun 06/13/21 06:32 AM
Humans are not animals. Common mistake made by many.
When a human cannot commit it is usually because of issues. Animals change mates to keep the species strong, not because they get a boner from another tigress or bear or whatever. That's what happens to people, lust-based.
Many people have issues with sexuality, in various levels of it hindering them lots or not at all, due to our glorious history of sexual abuse and oppression and not being allowed to simply enjoy it.
I have serious doubt a blackbird, magpie, bear, lion etc. will have sexual issues.

We are so far the only species that can choose to deviate from what the rest of our species does. Or we choose not to.

A man doesn't need to impregnate as many women as possible, and this need hasn't been around for thousands of years. With that, there is no need to swap partners either. Except for choice, ego, unresolved issues.

There is one other ancient and ongoing need that separate into: stability, love, belonging, safety.
So I think based on that it is pretty safe to say it IS natural for humans to be with 1 partner for a longer period of time as that fulfils all those needs.

i totally agree with you, still I find we are not all aligned with what love means

no photo
Sun 06/13/21 04:01 AM
Love everyone ? yes but humans or even animals are not really meant to stay together lifetime . why ? we all love and want change and that is fundamental nature of universe . Every one gets bored . Together in Highs and low may not be a problem but change is must even when we are together . Even if we dont like , the entire universe is made for change . So not to crib , keep meeting more people , love every one . keep together till comfortable and change when not should be the game . But never get sentimental is the key .

hmm.... I still think that Less is More in love -) sorry, although I am getting old, the idea of being happy with a lifetime partnet did not vanish with age-)

no photo
Sun 06/13/21 03:21 AM
Cold hands = warm heart. :smile:

warm hands = cold heart, if youtl takr too much sun you can still use some skin protection cream, you can probably avoid any burn

but can you use cream to protect hands when it is cold? But this would be something else and we need to create a separate discussion

no photo
Sun 06/13/21 02:42 AM
Ask anyone whether they want to love, and I am pretty much sure they will answer "yes, of course I want"...

Ask to the very same people whether they are willing to dedicate their life to another person, going through highs and lows always smiling and happy, keeping his/her hands tight even when cold burns the skin...

Ask all the above to the very same people and they will likely answer "No.. I only want to love"

Does really everyone want to love?