100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
Topic:
I Am A FICTIONAL Character!
|
|
You're a freakin' raccoon Deal with it! 
Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Oh no. Yeet! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
I Am A FICTIONAL Character!
|
|
Really? You don't say! You make me feel glad. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
I Am A FICTIONAL Character!
|
|
Really? You don't say! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
I Am A FICTIONAL Character!
|
|
ok, why not? LALALALALLALALALLALALLALALLALALLALALLALALALLALL GOTCHA! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
I Am A FICTIONAL Character!
|
|
Look out! Look out!
Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Aspuh-Danger! Ashuf! Ashuf-shuf-shuf-shuf-shuf-shuf-shuf-shuf-shuf-mousetraps! Aspuh-spuh-spuh-spuh-spuh-spuh-spuh! Spuh-spuh-spuh-spuh-spuh-spuh-spuh! Do you love me? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is sex is a Force or desire
|
|
trunner69: Sexual attraction is the drivng force that supports our existence on this planet. I believe it could be measured by measuring the activity within the pleasure centers in the brain which are electrical impulses.
... not only measured, but accumulated also: can you imagine how much kilowatts of power could be accumulated during a single act??? Though, the most effective would have to be a group sex: the energy accumulated could be equivalent to three horse powers!!! (enough for powering a rechargeable battery for a flash light, or something...) 
Honestly, why would anybody want to measure it  Perhaps, for creating an artificial reliever equipment? (a hat one puts on for experiencing the motions???) Phuck, how pathetic is that???
Although, from the pracrical point of view, it might be a great deter'ment of violence at prisons -- rewarding the inmates for good behavior!!! All of the criminals would voluntarily surrender to the police -- for a chance of getting back behind the bars (that would be renamed to "a pleasure house"!) _____________Gee, What a marvelous idea!!!________ 
There is no benefit to creating a prototypical measurement of whatever "force/s" is/are involved in that activity, mostly because determining such a standard measurement is literally impossible: There is no measurable and "standard" science to that activity, considering the innumerable differences between individuals involved and the high irregularity of the amount of force involved (in part, due to the difference masses of the people involved). No. Just no!! CAN'T YOU COMPREHEND A HEALTHY SARCAZM???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is sex is a Force or desire
Edited by
ZPicante
on
Mon 01/04/10 01:26 AM
|
|
trunner69: Sexual attraction is the drivng force that supports our existence on this planet. I believe it could be measured by measuring the activity within the pleasure centers in the brain which are electrical impulses.
... not only measured, but accumulated also: can you imagine how much kilowatts of power could be accumulated during a single act??? Though, the most effective would have to be a group sex: the energy accumulated could be equivalent to three horse powers!!! (enough for powering a rechargeable battery for a flash light, or something...)
Honestly, why would anybody want to measure it Perhaps, for creating an artificial reliever equipment? (a hat one puts on for experiencing the motions???) Phuck, how pathetic is that???
Although, from the pracrical point of view, it might be a great deter'ment of violence at prisons -- rewarding the inmates for good behavior!!! All of the criminals would voluntarily surrender to the police -- for a chance of getting back behind the bars (that would be renamed to "a pleasure house"!) _____________Gee, What a marvelous idea!!!________
There is no benefit to creating a prototypical measurement of whatever "force/s" is/are involved in that activity, mostly because determining such a standard measurement is literally impossible: There is no measurable and "standard" science to that activity, considering the innumerable differences between individuals involved and the high irregularity of the amount of force involved (in part, due to the difference masses of the people involved). No. Just no!! it's all about..... friction drinker Not clever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is sex is a Force or desire
|
|
You all keep saying, "oh, the four universal forces are at work during s--," like it's some special, singular activity that, by its sheer special-ness, brings them all together.
Someone implied that? I didn't see that anywhere. Certainly not on this page. Where was this implied? Uhhh...more than implied....
"All four of those universal forces are at work during sex, I won't bore you with how, but sex is not the fifth force. ...And? All four of those forces are also at work during jogging, so...hurray? <:| It just seems redundant, even if he's not the first person to mention that. Yes, you are correct that all four at work during jogging, and he is correct about all four being at work during sex. As far as your question... ...And? ...well it looks to me like he was simply making clear (as you and I have) that the original question was based of false set of categories. Its like if someone asks "Is that a citrus fruit, or a grapefruit?" one might wish to clarify that those are not mutually exclusive categories, as the question implies, by saying "Grapefruit is a type of citrus". So someone suggests "Sex is the 5th force" and another says "no, all four are using during sex, but sex is not a 5th force". Maybe you were expecting his statement to have a deeper meaning than it had? At face value, its as simple as your (correct) statement about jogging. Seriously, I think I get what you're saying, my main man. Just please calm down. Okay? ;) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Man in the Moon
|
|
"Man IN the moon"?
:| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is sex is a Force or desire
Edited by
ZPicante
on
Thu 12/31/09 02:41 AM
|
|
Thank you, JaneStar.
You all keep saying, "oh, the four universal forces are at work during s--," like it's some special, singular activity that, by its sheer special-ness, brings them all together. Someone implied that? I didn't see that anywhere. Certainly not on this page. Where was this implied? It looks to me like you, me, and CatsLoveMe all agree on how the 'categories' of forces, actions, desires, etc should be viewed. Simply existing as a human being (or as a rock, for that matter!) brings all four forces into play. "All four of those universal forces are at work during sex, I won't bore you with how, but sex is not the fifth force. In fact it is more appropiately labeled an "instinct." One some can control better than others." ...And? All four of those forces are also at work during jogging, so...hurray? <:| It just seems redundant, even if he's not the first person to mention that. Moreover, and I missed this before in reference to that CatsLoveMe quote (and I am repeating myself): SEX IS NOT AN INSTINCT!! IT IS NOT A DRIVE, NOT A FORCE, NOTHING BUT A PHYSICAL, BIOLOGICAL ACTION. Driven by instincts/forces/drives? YES! BUT SEX ITSELF IS NOT ANY OF THOSE THINGS: SEX IS AN ACTION!!! AN ACTION!! Ugh. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Dinosaurs.....
Edited by
ZPicante
on
Tue 12/29/09 11:10 PM
|
|
No.
... Their ever-decaying remains still exist. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is sex is a Force or desire
|
|
Hahahahahaha...wow. That is truly hilarious.
Not knowing exactly what this "four universal forces" business was about; I looked it up. And...wow. You all keep saying, "oh, the four universal forces are at work during s--," like it's some special, singular activity that, by its sheer special-ness, brings them all together. Read this: http://www.windows.ucar.edu/tour/link=/kids_space/forces.html&edu=high Tell me, does the physical chemistry of human beings, matter, and the whole universe change when two human beings engage in intercourse? O_O Please, don't speak. I don't want to read the answer. My heart--my brain--can't take it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
philosophy 101
Edited by
ZPicante
on
Tue 12/29/09 02:37 AM
|
|
That's awesome. You are the only person on here I know of who writes interesting titles that draw me in to an interesting poem. Well done.
(Well, other than me, of course.  )
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is sex is a Force or desire
Edited by
ZPicante
on
Tue 12/29/09 02:35 AM
|
|
Sex is not a force. It is an emotional drive...a desire. ...Obviously? <:| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
purpose
Edited by
ZPicante
on
Fri 12/25/09 12:29 AM
|
|
I think having purpose is what differentiates the animate from the inanimate. (Having indeed read the rest of your post, as well) I still sort of question this, in part perhaps because the way it is written.
What is meant by "purpose" makes a difference here. Does it mean "will (or a goal)," as in "I have (a) purpose in life," or does it mean "meaning," as in, "life itself has purpose"? The inanimate very well could have purpose; it could very well have "meaning" beyond our comprehension or intention, beyond our own definitions. I'm sure you meant "purpose" as in "the inanimate lacks free will and thus intent," but I believe that making a distinction between those two usages makes a difference. More to the point, things like plants (not sentient, at the very least) DO have pragmatic purposes: Feeding, giving oxygen to, and sheltering humanity and animals. Think of water's purposes. The earth itself's purposes. The sun's purposes. Etc. Even on a spiritual/philosophical level these things could be (and have been) said to have purpose (as in meaning): I had in mind the “goal” usage in my above post. Now personally, I differentiate between “goal” – as thing to be achieved – and “purpose” – as the reason why one desires to achieve it. For example, one wants to learn how to drive – that would be the “goal”, and the “purpose” would be “to be able to travel faster than walking”. The difference between that and the “meaning” meaning seems to be mainly that in the case of a “goal” (or “why”) it is applied to self as a desired end result, whereas in the case of “meaning”, it is applied to “other” as to how it relates to, or assist in, self achieving a desired end result. In other words, the purpose (why) of learning to drive a car is travel faster, and the purpose (meaning) of the car itself is to aid or assist in travelling faster. So in that sense, the animate/inanimate I think still applies. The animate has the “why” purpose and the inanimate has the “meaning” purpose. What you just said basically perfectly paraphrases what I already said; that the word has a variety of definitions and that context dictates what meaning applies. Although, your analogy is good. "Goal" and "purpose" can be synonymous terms. You say that purpose is the "why" OR "meaning"? Really, those, too, are synonymous. I think I explained it fairly clearly before. dictionary.com proves my point: purpose: 1. the reason for which something exists or is done, made, used, etc. The why / the meaning. Note the distinct lack of alternative co-definitions relating to either synonym. 2. an intended or desired result; end; aim; goal. Showing "purpose" is synonymous with "goal." 3. determination; resoluteness. This def. hasn't really been discussed, save for when I mentioned "intent," which very closely relates to the "goal" co-definition, anyway, save for the former being more personal. 4. the subject in hand; the point at issue.Again, not discussed in-depth. 5. practical result, effect, or advantage: to act to good purpose. Not really pertinent. So, there you have it. Nihilism, to be grossly condensed is your basic mix of despair and indifference in a moral aspect. recognizing that is simple in the basic dichotomy of our reality, but consider breaking down the term of purpose to fundamental states of existence, i mean regardless of what "things" trigger another, i guess when chaos goes to order and then to chaos, such cycle is a production of a purpose? or was purpose a rational schematic of such production? Nihilism means the lack of purpose; life has no purpose, no direction, no divine guidance, no meaning (subjective or objective). I would think, whether looking at the cause or effect of the system, that a Nihilist would still derive no discernible, solid meaning, because that would defeat the point of being Nihilist: A life without meaning, purpose, or direction--a life of defiance of systemic thought--is a life of pure anarchy and anarchy, whether tangible or philosophical, is almost-the-opposite-of-meaning chaos within chaos. Nihilism is admission of and submission to that chaos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is sex is a Force or desire
|
|
Sexual desire is biological. Neurological even, depending on how specific one wants to get. To say that it has anything to do with Physics comes from a confusion of terms. If anything, to say that sexuality has anything to do with "forces" more relates to philosophy or even spirituality. Things like predestination, causality, and fatalism come to mind. time must be linear for forces to hold it's value, so people is time linear lol? What on earth are you talking about? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is sex is a Force or desire
|
|
:|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
purpose
Edited by
ZPicante
on
Sun 12/20/09 03:32 AM
|
|
purpose, i will be rash on this one. we have no purpose in life. we are human and there for are the only animal to trick our selfs that we are greater they we truly are. we are ntohing more then animals with hopes that somthing incrediable will happen. however i take some happiness in this beacuse without purpose we are free. To do as we will, i dont like the thought that there is and invisable hand guiding me beacuse if so when that truly incrediable thing does happen. i will be left to think that i caused it beacuse of who i am, and not an empty meanless events that would happen to anyone that god or the fates or whatever you belive, have appointed it to. He's your guy. This philosophy we call Nihilism, kids! Smilin'? You may not be soon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
purpose
Edited by
ZPicante
on
Sun 12/20/09 03:20 AM
|
|
I think having purpose is what differentiates the animate from the inanimate. (Having indeed read the rest of your post, as well) I still sort of question this, in part perhaps because the way it is written.
What is meant by "purpose" makes a difference here. Does it mean "will (or a goal)," as in "I have (a) purpose in life," or does it mean "meaning," as in, "life itself has purpose"? The inanimate very well could have purpose; it could very well have "meaning" beyond our comprehension or intention, beyond our own definitions. I'm sure you meant "purpose" as in "the inanimate lacks free will and thus intent," but I believe that making a distinction between those two usages makes a difference. More to the point, things like plants (not sentient, at the very least) DO have pragmatic purposes: Feeding, giving oxygen to, and sheltering humanity and animals. Think of water's purposes. The earth itself's purposes. The sun's purposes. Etc. Even on a spiritual/philosophical level these things could be (and have been) said to have purpose (as in meaning): Think of Pantheism. Animism. Paganism. Existentialism. Dualism. Buddhism. Christianity or Creationism (creation gives glory to God and was meant to reflect Him and His role as Creator). Islam. Naturalism! A lot of people seem to believe the inanimate has purpose; we even have whole (belief) systems and philosophies surrounding it. ... More on-topic: Post-Modernism, the "mood" under which society now lives, strongly affects how people will define and pursue (a) "purpose." As with the movement, the overarching, bigger purposes to existence lose out to individual definitions, to individual perspectives. How one person defines and lives purpose does not as critically affect how another person does. This we call "tolerance." While one person's individual "narrative" explanation of purpose, their worldview, may apply in writing to all humanity, the tendency to convince others that that sense of "purpose" is the "right way" is an ambition that has been largely lost in a sea of political correctness and the aversion to discourse that philosophical/social decorum creates. In short, individual purpose rules and, in this time, is praised only when it remains most silent and innocuous to others. It almost seems solipsistic, how strongly we favor discretion for our beliefs. As for "goals," that definition, I would say that sort of thing is far less philosophical, less abstruse (yes, abstruse), than other meanings of "purpose." A goal is a fairly straightforward thing, as in a career goal. Not many people would argue about your desire to be a ventriloquist when you grow up, save for perhaps its lack of practicality and probability of succeeding, but generally that definition is less complex. So yes. That's that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Is sex is a Force or desire
|
|
Sexual desire is biological. Neurological even, depending on how specific one wants to get. To say that it has anything to do with Physics comes from a confusion of terms.
If anything, to say that sexuality has anything to do with "forces" more relates to philosophy or even spirituality. Things like predestination, causality, and fatalism come to mind. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
