Insurance does not pay for Viagra/Cialis. A woman's best resource is her Doctor. Men and women both tend to blame it is just the ageing process on many things from sex to shortness of breath when in most cases there is a medical condition causing the problem and can be dealt with. Eventually they will realize that when they experience a significant medical emergency. There are many good, informative articles available for both genders.

You might find this useful: https://www.mayoclinic.org/search/search-results?q=Sexual%20dysfunction%2C%20female

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/health-news/sex-less-likely-and-less-satisfying-as-women-hit-older-age/ar-AAEbE6E?li=BBnba9O

Seems like the odds get worse with each year a lady ages after 50.

Anyways, he is considered top dog scientist/zoologist and he claims animal homosexuality is a load of crap!!

Iam indeed aware what science claims. What I laugh at about these specific animals, is that they at times are able to be male or female. Not bi-gender, but survival mechanism. If there are low numbers of either the males or females, most of these animals have the ability to be one or the other in order to reproduce.

But for the typical person reading such articles, they do not get past the headlines claiming homosexual animals. They "Are Not" homosexual, they are able to preserve their species.

Most are amphibians that go through several stages before getting to adulthood. And even as they go through this process of becoming an egg, tadpole, a couple other stages before a frog, they can determine their own sex by the population of what surrounds them. If there are more males, they can become female. And then in adulthood, they can be both to reproduce.

In my opinion, this is God throwing out the proverbial bone. Some people will see this and make a judgement and base it their entire lives. Others like myself, will research it until I know what there is all to know before making a judgement call.

But yes, I am well aware what science claims. Have you ever paid much attention to those within science? Most of them are gay. It's why we have the "born this way," when "natural selection" on its own kills anything non specific. And not being either male or female is non specific. So that cracks me up even more to see how science does not even follow its own rules when it applies to personal view and choice!!

My brother and I have the same father, but different mothers. He is 2 years older than I am. My parents went to church, my Father like his Father was a minister, and not a single moment have I ever thought to myself, wow, that Dude looks hot!!

My brother's mothers however, was an avid drug user, and paid for her habit by prostituting. Sadly, she died of aids in here late 30's. But, when men would come over and they would get high and party, my brother said several times if his Mom was passed out. These men raped him. It messed with his mind. Today, he has a partner but admits it's definitely due to a mental issue from being abused.

I have read in several scenarios where a father raped his daughter, or the son was molested by an Uncle, they ended up staying with the "same sex." To me, that is clearly not "born that way."

I also had another case study where the parents decided eating meat was bad for us. They had young boys around 8 and 10 who played on my Pop Warner football teams. I told them, vegan is great for adults, but young boys are growing and developing and need proteins that only meat can provide. Long story short, those parents overloaded those boys with estrogen from just being a vegan. It literally feminized them. The parents are so ashamed of what they did and how their boys turned out, the Father killed himself over it.

So clearly, bad circumstances play a major role in how a child grows up and chooses who to love!!

The Bible wants to point out that there's only one God... and anybody else's point of view is false... Why we keep arguing this amongst ourselves would just in typical Jehovah create someone Gay if they weren't made to love that other person they're seeking? I've heard a story where a woman began seeing a phycologist and in a past life rather recent she was a German Air Bomber in WW2... She was a he and he had 3 or so kids... to better the odds... he also was against the war but the man she is dating now shot down his plane and he died... so she gravitates away from this fellow because it's not the first time she was a man and this guy she is now dating has killed her in a past life... Many Lives Many Masters...

So what's the ultimate answer to your question of query to the relative subject? Not God... What does your soul consider "gay"? Is religion a mass fed media based to believe only in what the masses consider good graces or each and every one of us believing something different?

Religion in itself could be everything that represents evil, the enemy, someone's worst nightmare. Religion and God are two separate entities and realities. Religion typically is based upon a set of rules, codes, ethics, morals based upon human idealism. Religion is the condition of the one who created it.

So, based upon who created a specific religion, that religion could be homophobic if the creator is homophobic.

If we took out religion and just added God, we would understand why God created human beings. To procreate, to find a wife/husband and create a family unit. Two Lesbians cannot create a baby together, just like two homosexual males cannot create a baby together. Therefore, we know from understanding the plan of God that people are not born to find the same sex attractive. People are born to procreate.

But just because God designed us to procreate does not mean God is homophobic. The creation of a child between a husband and wife, was meant to build a bond between the man and woman. But naturally, two women together or two men together cannot create a child.

What has happened though, people who understand God and His plan, have taken it upon themselves to claim God is homophobic. That is not the case at all. God has designed a specific purpose, and only a man and woman (two people of opposite sex) can meet and fulfill this purpose. Anything else, is not what God purposed or planned.

Congrats to the winners

You will always meet women and some men that ignore you or think they are too good to be bothered with acknowledging your existence. This seems to have gotten much worse over time and may be just part of the current culture. It is who they are and you don't want to know them anyway. Just ignore them and treat them in the same manner. It is not worth our effort or stress to try and deal with them. There will always be a smaller subset of females who are open to acknowledging our existence and being friendly.

I likewise believe that adults should be responsible and take precautions about having children. But because most people dont discuss kids before they have sex with another person, it is up to each individual to be responsible for THEMSELF. if a woman doesnt want to deal with a pregnancy, she has to take that responsibility for herself. Likewise, a man that doesnt want children has to take that responsiblity on themself.

The solution to women having abortions is not to hold MEN Responsible for whether THEY get pregnant, as a previous post suggests, but to hold WOMEN Responsible for whether we get pregnant. Just like the answer to men not being made to pay child support is not to hold the woman responsible for not getting pregnant, but for men to be held responsible for not GETTING anyone present.

WE can only be sure of what we are doing with our own bodies, so we must take the precautions for what WE Want to happen with them.

I could care less about being "desirable" for some old decrepit fat man. Tell you what you do you I'll do me. Some of you people could stand to lose weight or color their hair a realistic looking color or even think about wearing a toupee instead of a trump combover but do you see me on here thinking I'm all that hella no.

Women like rich men in the same way you like beautiful women. Men cannot have it both ways. You stop picking women based on hotness, and we will stop picking men based on salary. Deal?

Hmm... not even going to bother with this. If you are still at such a level of not knowing or understanding, and judgement, assumption and telling what I said even though I didn't... there's is no point.
To each their own after all.

He's not saying it to 'a woman'. He is wondering about women, and why.
And you know, he is right.
Women are supposed to be in their heartspace, not their head. But because of how society is construed and where we are now, most have to be in their head in order to survive, make a living and fend for themselves.
Bummer is that it also tends to wear a woman out as it is not natural, but most don't even know until you teach them how to shift and they feel the difference. It's like coming home to yourself.
And yes, for a man it's different. They are left-hemisphere based, logical and so on. We are supposed to be right-hemisphere based. Life forces us to also be left hemisphere.
Of course in a relationship that doesn't work. You then got two 'heads' coming together while you need a heart to heart connection.
For men it's more difficult to get there as their natural state is to be more in the head. Some have become balanced enough to have their inner feminine back it up.
Others need a woman to help them out with it. If you know how to do this... works a treat. It connects, shifts the energy between man and woman.
That gets difficult when woman stays in her head too much, and most do.
The peculiar thing is that often when man and woman meet the man listen to his instinct and will sense when something is off. He may not know what, but he'll feel it and then he's off.
Woman on the other hand tends to get into her head and start thinking. "Does he live close enough so if we get involved..." "Is he really serious?" "What would my parents/friends think of him?" and so on.

If you are directing your yhoughts towards me, I come from a lineage of evangelists, pastors, ministers who taught this stuff in Bible based universities plus preached it, lived it, ate, slept it, breathed it themselves.

And yes, there are points within the Canon that are just examples of how to live that did not take place.

But when it comes to who Yeshua was, being the fact that He is God, those verses we can take as fact.

The reason we can take as fact, is due to the scripture reference I used was directed to His Disciples, who later became the Apostles plus Paul in the Book of Acts. And when Yeshua dealt with His own Disciples, there was no gimmick going on, because Yesua needed His Disciples to understand just exactly who He really was.

I respect what your Grandfather was saying to you, but I believe had he been more specific, he would have said it in a manner I just have!!

Yes, I know the Mormons are so keen on baptism that they try to baptise EVERYONE, including those who are dead. That's why they created their database of as many people as they can find. It is kind of them to make it available to people who are into geneology, although their reasons are very different.

If I had any experience of them, I would have written about it, but where I live it is rare to see them, although the JWs are everywhere. The JWs are usually a woman with a young child, or two women, never a man on his own or a couple of men. They walk along very slowly, as if daydreaming. In contrast the Mormons are young men, always very smartly dressed, looking rather like salesmen, which I suppose is what they all are!

My grandfather was an Anglican (Church of England) vicar. One day when he had been retired for many years we had a family gathering - his son (my Dad) and his two daughters with our families. Some JWs came to the door and said, "Do you know, it says in the Bible..." and here I am sad to say that my memory has let me down, so I can't remember the quote they gave.

My grandfather knew his Bible inside out, upside down and probably backwards as well. He replied, "Yes, true, but did you know that the Bible also says..." and he gave a quote the was the total opposite of the first quote. It became clear that they had been trained on the topic of the day and had no answer for him. After a time, they started again with another quote and immediately my dear grandfather replied with another total opposite! This really upset them and they thought about it for a while before coming up with another quote. Again, grandad immediately countered with another opposite. This went on for a time until the JWs gave up and went away.

Back indoors we gave him a big round of applause and he made the point that you should not treat the Bible as literally true because it is full of complete contrasts. It should be used by Christians only as a guide.

Once (many years ago) when they came to my house I invited them in, a woman with her small son. We separated them, my wife spoke with the boy and I spoke with his mother. We compared notes afterwards and the boy explained that everyone who is not a JW is a devil worshipper! You're either one of us or a devil worshipper. Very sad.

When the lady offered me a copy of the Watchtower, I gave her a copy of the local Christian news, a small magazine with contributions from the Anglican, Methodist, Catholic and United Reform Churches in this area. She refused to read it because she explained she is not allowed to read anything that has not been approved by her elders! She couldn't understand why it is better for me to make up my own mind about what I read. If she had looked she would have found my magazine to be full of such dreadful things as adverts for jumble sales!

I know they keep records and I'd love to know what they wrote down because they've never called here again. They stand outside the house, clearly looking at their cards and then walk on by to the next house.

Just a thought, with the current regulations about privacy, are they allowed to keep such records about people? Are they legally required to give us a copy of everything they know about us, just as social media, banks and others are required to do? Maybe I should ask one of them and see what they say.

Ok true. I can see how it can be both ways. Although most women I'm around would love to settle down. Oh and yeah there are many expressions of love and getting to know someone. Ultimately I just don't see how being in a rush is one

Oh, believe me, "being in a rush" is very much an expression of desire, interest, and even seriousness. Again, not JUST sexually.

I've been searching for friends and a possible mate through this method for a long time now, and I've seen woman after woman and man after man, complain in forums like this, that too many people want to talk for a long time before agreeing to a face to face meet. The complainers tend to be looking at their own lifetimes ticking away, and want someone who is dedicated enough to having a serious relationship to take all the steps needed to build one.

By extension, the same thinking leads to eagerness to test sexual compatibility as soon as possible as well, for many people.

Naturally, as I have noticed from a very early age, for every logical and good idea someone has in the world, there are hundreds of people eager to use it as an excuse or a disguise, to simply greedily grab at whatever personal rewards they enjoy.

So make no mistake, I am an easy does it kind of person myself, but I understand why some others aren't inclined to take the time that I require.

I don't think I've ever had sex with anyone to find out if they are compatible with me. Sorry, but that sounds weird.
Sure you have to get at least partially nekkid to find out if his equipment is erm... impressive enough to give pleasure, but the rest you can tell quite well from the way they react when you kiss and cuddle and so on.

Just so you know, I'm not advocating anything, I'm just reporting the actual facts about what I've witnessed real people doing.

On the other hand, I don't think there's any way other than having sex with someone, to find out if HOW they enjoy sex is something you can live with.

Yes and that's where the problem lies cos usually you don't get to that point until there's feelings. Well, most women wouldn't anyway. And if it then doesn't match or doesn't work, then what? Break it off? Not so easy when you're emotionally involved.

Which is exactly the reasoning used by some who say they want to move things along quickly in the early stages.

I think that when people are very young, and make such claims, many really are just sniggering and using it as a manipulative ploy to have lots of carefree sex. But I think more of the older folks really do see the sense of it, as a way to avoid investing too much time, too much money, and too much hopeful emotion into someone who may turn out to be all talk and wishful thinking.

Maybe, but I've never heard that as a reason to have sex.
Getting to that is based on mutual desire.
To be honest, the thought of having sex just to find out if the man can deliver the goods... I couldn't even do that. Goes against the grain. It wouldn't arise me, if nothing else, it'd kill any desire.
Plus, I have no desire end up with a whole bunch of 'test sex rides'.
Maybe it's a thing men tend to do, dunno.