NC seceded after the Fed gov threatened to attack across their land the State of SC. That's why there is no mention of slavery.

Here,
Ga is more specific. They were one of the first to secede.
Make sure you read what the say about the Republicans interests in power.

The party of Lincoln, called the Republican party, under its present name and organization, is of recent origin. It is admitted to be an anti-slavery party. While it attracts to itself by its creed the scattered advocates of exploded political heresies, of condemned theories in political economy, the advocates of commercial restrictions, of protection, of special privileges, of waste and corruption in the administration of Government, anti-slavery is its mission and its purpose. By anti-slavery it is made a power in the state. The question of slavery was the great difficulty in the way of the formation of the Constitution. While the subordination and the political and social inequality of the African race was fully conceded by all, it was plainly apparent that slavery would soon disappear from what are now the non-slave-holding States of the original thirteen. The opposition to slavery was then, as now, general in those States and the Constitution was made with direct reference to that fact. But a distinct abolition party was not formed in the United States for more than half a century after the Government went into operation. The main reason was that the North, even if united, could not control both branches of the Legislature during any portion of that time. Therefore such an organization must have resulted either in utter failure or in the total overthrow of the Government. The material prosperity of the North was greatly dependent on the Federal Government; that of the the South not at all. In the first years of the Republic the navigating, commercial, and manufacturing interests of the North began to seek profit and aggrandizement at the expense of the agricultural interests. Even the owners of fishing smacks sought and obtained bounties for pursuing their own business (which yet continue), and $500,000 is now paid them annually out of the Treasury.

This part!

The material prosperity of the North was greatly dependent on the Federal Government; that of the the South not at all. In the first years of the Republic the navigating, commercial, and manufacturing interests of the North began to seek profit and aggrandizement at the expense of the agricultural interests. Even the owners of fishing smacks sought and obtained bounties for pursuing their own business (which yet continue), and $500,000 is now paid them annually out of the Treasury.

He didn't say he was a democrat nor that the kkk was democrat.

So you still have failed.

North Carolina



AN ORDINANCE to dissolve the union between the State of North Carolina and the other States united with her, under the compact of government entitled "The Constitution of the United States."



We, the people of the State of North Carolina in convention assembled, do declare and ordain, and it is hereby declared and ordained, That the ordinance adopted by the State of North Carolina in the convention of 1789, whereby the Constitution of the United States was ratified and adopted, and also all acts and parts of acts of the General Assembly ratifying and adopting amendments to the said Constitution, are hereby repealed, rescinded, and abrogated.



We do further declare and ordain, That the union now subsisting between the State of North Carolina and the other States, under the title of the United States of America, is hereby dissolved, and that the State of North Carolina is in full possession and exercise of all those rights of sovereignty which belong and appertain to a free and independent State.



Done in convention at the city of Raleigh, this the 20th day of May, in the year of our Lord 1861, and in the eighty-fifth year of the independence of said State.



Where in there does it say slavery?

Order of Secession,
South Carolina December 20, 1860
Mississippi January 9, 1861
Florida January 10, 1861
Alabama January 11, 1861
Georgia January 19, 1861
Louisiana January 26, 1861
Texas February 1, 1861
http://americanhistory.about.com/library/charts/blchartsecession.htm


On April 10, 1861, CSA Brigadier General Beauregard, in command of the provisional Confederate forces at Charleston, South Carolina, demanded the surrender of the Union garrison of Fort Sumter in Charleston Harbor. Garrison commander Anderson refused.

On April 12th the Fed Navy opened fire on the Ft. Now in the hands of the CSA.

http://americancivilwar.com/statepic/sc/sc001.html

After this and the Presidents communicating intent to take back the Ft at all costs, the following states seceded,


Virginia April 17, 1861*
Arkansas May 6, 1861*
North Carolina May 20, 1861*
Tennessee June 8, 1861*

If they had just let the CSA hold on to the FT, which was taken without loss of life, these states, all border states, probably wouldn't have seceded and the Civil War would never have happened.

I guess you are assuming that all repubs are conservative, huh?

No, it is not.

No you did not show that the KKK was started by the democrats.

You did not prove it, show it or demonstrate it at all.

Man you missed all the history classes.

Northerners owned slaves too.

The party is completely different now and a shame to the original party.

Exactly!

So how can the North claim they were fighting to free the slaves without even freeing their own?

It's a case of the victor trying to write their version of history.
Thank God the Republicans couldn't take away free speech.
The history and truth is still there.

LOL
Don't tell me you thought all southerners were plantation owners like in the movies.

You know after reading through the original post again.

The original Republicans would be ASHAMED of their descendents today, wouldn't they have????


So sad to see the degeneration of a good party like that.

You haven't proven your point yet.

I am still waiting.

Democrats did not start the KKK.

Slaves were not freed, even in the North until the war was over. 1865!

Wow,,, ok

and Ronny,,,this statement "Republicans are not racists, poeple are racists" is 100 percent correct. I believe that racism is not political but personal and can be found on both sides. I just think that most people are under the impressiont that social programs mostly benefit minority groups and therefore the taxpayers who do happen to be racists against these groups are more likely to align themselves with the republican party which generally opposes such programs.

Most southerners didnt even own slaves. Esp the poor ones who volunteered to fight.
Besides, slavery was still legal in the North.

I'll also repeat. Most Southern States did not secede from the Union until Ft. Sumter was attacked.
To most the defining reason was States rights. They didn't appreciate the Fed Gov marching Armies across their land to attack their neighbors.

When Lincoln finally wrote the emancipation Proclamation it was for use as a weapon and only pertained to the slaves in southern states at first.
He hoped it would cause an uprising of slaves in the south to disrupt the confederate army at their rear.

It didnt work.