It's simple logic.

1: Power corrupts.
2: Politicians (for good reasons or bad) crave power.
3: Therefore, the people need to be able to control politicans.
4: Membership of the EU dilutes the ability of those governed
to get rid of those governing.
5: Therefore, vote to leave.

It is an issue that we may well have to address.

Although it's probably a long way off, we could well build machines that are recognised as having intelligence and it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that they may eventually match or exceed ours. What then?

Scotland is (still) part of the UK and so is included in BREXIT.

That said, the Scottish government's view is that as all voting districts in Scotland voted to remain (a total of 62% remain, 38% leave), they want another referendum on Scottish independence so they can stay in the EU.

What is it exactly that makes a transgender person unable to serve in the forces (other thank the ick-factor some people feel)?

It's worth pointing out, once again, the meanings of these independent terms.
'Gnostic' concerns knowledge.
'Theist' concerns belief.
If you believe in a god or gods, you are a theist.
If you do not believe in any gods (including being uncertain), you are an atheist.
If you know there are gods, you are a gnostic.
If you do not know if there are gods, you are agnostic.
Most people who describe themselves as atheists are probably better described as agnostic atheists: they cannot be certain there are no gods but they don't believe there are any.

Perhaps those who are so against this should take time to meet and talk to people like these:

http://www.dignityindying.org.uk/personal-stories/

Ignoring it in the sense of catching the person and applying the law?

Such a sympathetic and caring response from someone who clearly must know more about the case than has been published.

I would suggest that you try to understand the careful explanations that several people have made here rather than sticking to your own inventions for the meanings of words.

You cannot prove scientific theories, but the crucial thing about them is that they can be disproved. All you need is one fact that does not fit to show that a theory is either wrong, incomplete, or an approximation. To become theories, hypotheses have to be supported by all the available evidence and survive strenuous attempts at being disproved, attempts which are encouraged and never end.

This makes scientific theories the exact opposite of religious dogma where contradictory evidence is dismissed or ignored.

Those dreaded 'chemicals' again. Would you care to name something that isn't a chemical?

No, it's yet another conspiracy (yawn).

Those who wish to will continue to consider the scientific word 'theory' as being a synonym for 'guess'. Once they have been corrected, their repetition of the mantra "it's only a theory" is nothing short of lying. Anyone who says it and is older than about twelve is asking to be ignored.

You forgot to mention the invisible purple unicorns and pink rabbits.

Scotland actually.

Ah - the "No true Scotsman" fallacy.

For a little balance, how about a modern Christian atrocity:

"[The Central African Republic Genocide] is an ongoing conflict... While the UN hasn’t called it a genocide yet, Reuters acknowledges that what the Christians are doing is ethnic cleansing against a Muslim minority. The conflict is very much one of Christians working to expel Muslims from the country, and by all accounts, they’ve been very successful so far."

Pot meet kettle.

Not only do I condemn Muslims who do terrible things, but I also condemn EVERYONE who sinks to that level.

FYI: In the UK, the penny is legal tender only for amounts not exceeding 20p.

Why wait for this mysterious 'left'? It seems to be an excuse for you doing nothing yourself.

How do you get from "unidentified" to "I've identified it as an alien craft"?

Absolutely. Anything that becomes an obsession gets corrupted and debased.