Thank you for the link, it is rather interesting and I will take my time to read through all of it.

This question arose for me yesterday in the other thread, and I'm quite curious what others think about 'groundless' thoughts.

In my opinion they can not exist, because, as you said, every thought has to come from somewhere, and it should be our duty to explore the origin in order to understand.

What are they, and who has them?

Who determines which thoughts are ‘groundless’, and on what basis?

Maybe this question is ‘groundless’ to someone who doesn’t understand where it comes from?

Are perhaps all my thoughts ‘groundless’ to someone because they are based on my own experiences, which someone in another Country can not have because their lifestyle is so different from mine?

Or are they ‘groundless’ to someone else because we just don’t have the same level of education?

Does not understanding where someone else is coming from give me the right to dismiss their opinions and thoughts as ‘groundless’?

I do admit that sometimes things that are discussed here baffle me. Perhaps I don’t see the reason for the discussion at all, or I have it seen discussed ad nauseum already and don’t believe that I will find new arguments in 20 pages of the same topic?

But do I have a right to dismiss anything as ‘groundless’ only because it does not conform with my own thoughts, or because for some reason or other I just don’t understand what the other one is trying to say?

So, what,in you opinion, are ‘groundless’ thoughts?

Way I see it, creative is trying to keep those out of the forum that are interested, but, like me, don't have the means of proper language to express themselves.
There are so many threads I'm reading, and would like to respond to, but I don't have the words, and creative would lock me out of the few I do have thoughts and words for.

but you look too well fed.

you don't look very appetizing though.

He has foreseen that and conveniently disappeared.

Where is the eraser when you need it?

Oh, dam..................

While the others get away with murder?

Like in other places we know?

No, tis awry alright.

How do I illustrate the soundness of something that as of yet only exists in my head?
Something that does exist, but I don't know the words for it yet.
The words might come as the 'plot' unravels, but unless I'm able to talk about it without restriction of this or the other rule will never come to light?

No, she gets anything to match her.

Philosophy, in my understanding, has not to be based on something someone said before me and therefore can be proven with links, other peoples words and such.

If I do have my own philosophy, do how do I provide links for something that only may exist in my head?

How do I prove, or undermine, an idea that is my own?

How do I prove my believes that are solely my own?

The moment you tell me how to, I will.

But............

if he can't get the license before spending all of that money?

And then it gets denied despite spending it?

Of course you did, like so many of us. But you have to know when enough is enough. It's all about mind games by now.

I'm having a problem here.

As far as I understand the man is in distress.

His money, and therefore his livelihood is in jeopardy when he doesn't get this license, so what gives?

Only when it suits.

As I knew you would.

Love and light to you.