Community > Posts By > Daniel74126

 
Daniel74126's photo
Thu 01/07/16 03:01 PM

Daniel74126's photo
Thu 01/07/16 02:49 PM

I think a problem arises when the woman is captured and inevitably, repeatedly raped. The enemy, these days, has a very low opinion of women.

Do both genders get training for that situation?


What makes you think the men don't get raped? I won't argue that a woman has a higher chance of that happening than a man, but trust me, it has happened and far more often than you would think; and for all the very same reasons that women get raped (not physical pleasure).

there is NO training that can be given to prepare ANY person for the possibility of rape, outside of raping the person yourself.

You also say "inevitably" raped. I hate to burst your bubble, but if you look at the captured female soldiers (or non military females that are captured and held as hostages) there have been very few, rapes. Again, I won't say it has never happened, but it is still extremely rare.

You need to stop listening to horror stories and start looking for facts. One of which is very simply, more female soldiers are raped by our own men than they are by the enemy. And the answer to resolve that is transparency and punishment for the rapist, not the victim.

Daniel74126's photo
Thu 01/07/16 02:39 PM


at the base seems to be whether we have a blanket belief in men being stronger than women or not...

in the past, I have believed in INDIVIDUAL assessment,
for instance, I believe that the 'monster' theory whenever a male puts his hands on a woman aggressively is BUNK,, unless woman is just as much a 'monster' when she does the same to a man


I believe if you are grown and put your hands on someone, you don't get to be a 'victim' if they return the favor, whatever sex you are


,,,consistent with that, it seems to me that IF and when they find females that can truly hang with the boys,,, there shouldn't be a reason to exclude THAT female,,,


still, no one has answered my question... why do men and women have separate leagues in ALL sports? this includes non-sports, like diving, pool, darts, even ribbon twirling... any takers on this?


Very simply because the older generations are all pigs who think that the different genders are not capable of competing against each other. Thankfully Nature has an answer for that and it can not be argued against ;-)

Daniel74126's photo
Thu 01/07/16 02:37 PM


you really need to think it through!
Mixed Units are a Logistic Nightmare,and that's just the beginning of the problem!slaphead


Oh? I did not realize that female soldiers ate different rations than the men. nor did I realize that they use a different brand of toilet paper to wipe their arse when they get done taking a dump. Funny, I never noticed a difference in the uniform either (my ex wife inherited all my uniforms when we got married since they were already the same). The boots were identical too, just different sizes.
The women didn't wear anything us men did not wear. We used the same weapons. We used the same mattresses in our barracks and the same cots in the field (when we had cots).

The only "logistic nightmare" for an integrated military force are the ancient pigs that still see women as inferior and treat them with disrespect and discrimination. Thankfully, we are slowly getting rid of all the pork.

Daniel74126's photo
Thu 01/07/16 02:32 PM

at the base seems to be whether we have a blanket belief in men being stronger than women or not...

in the past, I have believed in INDIVIDUAL assessment,
for instance, I believe that the 'monster' theory whenever a male puts his hands on a woman aggressively is BUNK,, unless woman is just as much a 'monster' when she does the same to a man


I believe if you are grown and put your hands on someone, you don't get to be a 'victim' if they return the favor, whatever sex you are


,,,consistent with that, it seems to me that IF and when they find females that can truly hang with the boys,,, there shouldn't be a reason to exclude THAT female,,,


Well put and the simple fact is the females are already there and lined up, and have been for several decades. The military pt standards are designed to assess an individual, not a gender. They are based on common qualities shared be many various groups, including yes, gender, as well as height, weight, age.
What the problem with some of these people is, is the fact that they dont want to accept that a woman can and is just as CAPABLE as they are. They believe that men are better simply because they are stronger and it simply is not true.

Daniel74126's photo
Thu 01/07/16 02:27 PM


You know, I would LOVE for you to meet a few friends of mine (all female) who served in front line type positions (such as with marine infantry units). Everyone is entitled their individual opinion, but you really do need to wake up and realize that you are in the 21st century now, not the dark ages. Discrimination IS being put to rest, slowly but surely, this is not going to stop.


Well, I spent my time in Paris Island, combat training and Camp Lejeune and there was a reason the men and women were separated. Don't get me wrong, the woman trained hard, that is for sure. And they were tough as they could be. But fact is they would get there *** kicked in the hand to hand combat training if the training was male / Female.Which would more the likely mean failure on the battle field, which in turn leads to death.. for her. And it puts the other Marines in danger.

PC... No... Fact... yes.




pc... no. Fact... no.

REAL fact... women are required to show initial capability prior to entrance, just as men are. During training, they go up against both men and women (and have since before I was in). If they could not handle themselves and pass the training? They are discharged for not meeting standards, just like the men.

Real Fact 2.. if any of us men hurt another soldier during training by not having ONE HUNDRED PERCENT CONTROL of ourselves, we faced disciplinary action from extra duty on up to jail time and dishonorable discharge (same thing if a woman did nto control herself and hurt someone)

Daniel74126's photo
Thu 01/07/16 02:22 PM

This sexist/homophobic garbage is so much tripe it would be funny if it were not so ridiculous.

There are a lot of qualities that determine fitness for duty and who could and should be in in a combat theater and the best professional to do the job. Size and brute strength has not been and never will be the single factor; and if that were the case some of the smaller size male Marines would have never been in the Ranks either.

Those who think that men and women can not train together, fight together, and yes live together with out sexualizing each other are the same kind of perverts that say the few that use sexual abuse of children as and irresistible urge as justification. Many men, and women, understand the sacrifices of privacy in situations they either choose to serve together or are forced to by circumstances to endure and just as often over come the enemy. Are they aware of gender, well duh yea, but so are the those who have served for generations and were attracted to same gender and did not act on that either. At least at not such a level as to impede the mission. And those in command and leadership positions will tell you, any day of the week, it is not the gender of the soldier but their ability to put the mission first.

I dare say, from experience, that it does not downgrade the ability of either gender; except for those few bad apples that want it to be used for their own selfish advantage over others. And in fact actually make the units stronger both mentally and physically. And in some ways smaller soldiers weather male or female are actually better at certain tactics, and surviving certain situations. This has been proven historically over and over. In militias all over the world.

If you actually have been in real combat or life and death situations females are just as fierce and just as capable as males to resist and overwhelm as men.

I dare say I am a much better marksman, able to defend myself by tactics and self defense/attack/survival skills as the majority of men. And I know my ability to think and survive my situation on my wits, stamina, cunning, and experience is better than many men.




Very well put Star!

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 09:56 PM
Me, I am looking for my dream girl. I see her in my dreams every night when I close my eyes; i feel her in my arms as I slip further down into sleep. She is usually shorter than me, but not always and almost always has red hair, though again, not always. her smile lightens up the room, and has on more than one occasion woken me up from my sleep, it was so bright. Her eyes; I have no way to describe the beauty and vision I see when I look into her eyes. Nor can I explain the sense of peace and "rightness with the world" I feel when she looks back at me. She has no need of clothing as her hair wraps around the length of her body, protecting her from not only all of nature, but also from the unwanted attention of others. It is silky gloss as i shines in the sun, but feels like morning dew when I run my hands through it.

Barring the highly unlikely chance that I would actually find my dream girl lol, I am looking for someone who is intelligent, but compassionate. Understanding, yet firm. She needs to be soft spoken (meaning, not looking for a fight or argument) and she also needs to be willing to give life everything has has in order to get back everything life has to offer.


What are YOU looking for?

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 09:25 PM

21 year old kids are sending me messages frustrated


I have to be honest, I had to go look at your profile after you made the comment about twenty one year olds sending you messages. to be completely fair and honest your main picture does NOT show your age. When I first saw it in the forums here, I thought you were early to mid twenties. Then after seeing you comment, I figured ok she has aged well and she is in her late twenties.

however, I do not go off just the one picture, I went ahead and looked through all of them you have posted and can see why you would be frustrated (I would be too). It's obvious these boys are not reading anything other than their first glance. I myself refuse to even consider contacting a person unless they have SOMETHING written in the "about me" space AND they have filled out several of the basic questions (smoking, kids, etc)

I get five to ten spams per week and it gets VERY FRUSTRATING to realize they meet NONE of my interests (outside of suposedly having a killer body lol). I would much rather find someone with an average body and an intelligent personality that is fun to be around than barbie.

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 09:10 PM
let's see what happens when a woman kicks you square between the legs. let's see who the "weaker" one is then, shall we? Every single one of us has traits and abilities that differentiate us from our neighbor. These differences are what make us stronger as a whole and more capable of standing our ground when need be.

When you build a road, you build it from several different materials all mixxed together in order to hold the road together through the stress and strain of being driven on. The same thing goes for our armed forces. You disregard what a woman can bring to the line with her simply because she is "weaker than you" and you are going to be in for a world of hurt eventually.

A persons ability to do the job compared to another person is not based off of their ability to lift 200 pounds or how long they can last. Yes, certain jobs require minimum standards to perform them; but these are minimum standards that are set for ALL CITIZENS, not just men or not just women. The women that apply for, are approved and go through infantry training, receive the same exact training you or I would receive and they are held to the very same standards, which are based on the whole, rather than an arbitrary number. they are based on the minimum amount of exertion and force put out to complete the mission. Men's standards may say %75 percent and womens say .75%, but guess what? They are the same in the end.

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 08:43 PM
I apologize Sitka if you think I was saying the gender integration is discriminitory. That was not what I meant at all. I was referring to very specific remarks made by another poster who WAS talking in a highly discriminitive and sexist manner

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 08:41 PM
your right, i was not completely correct in my assessment. You're also a classic sexist (I wills top here before I get myself in trouble with the moderators). The problem with people like yourself, is that you think you are better than anyone who does not fit your mold or your idea of how things should be. In the case of this discussion you have completely insulted women of all Nations and Cultures and you have also made yourself look extremely childish.

you state, a woman has a place in the military but it's one that YOU handpick for her. That she is not good enough to perform in an infantry setting, simply because she is not built the same way you are. You also in prior statements bring up hormones of both genders and phrase yourself in such a manner as to suggest that our military members are unable to control themselves when presented with someone of the opposite gender.

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 08:33 PM
I sure hope you are not accusing me of something as vile as plagiarism...

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 08:31 PM
oh I freely admit I do not know everything, however I do know what horse manure and cow dung smell like and no I am not afraid to holler out when I smell it so nobody else steps in it ;-)

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 07:04 PM
You know, I would LOVE for you to meet a few friends of mine (all female) who served in front line type positions (such as with marine infantry units). Everyone is entitled their individual opinion, but you really do need to wake up and realize that you are in the 21st century now, not the dark ages. Discrimination IS being put to rest, slowly but surely, this is not going to stop.

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 06:45 PM
Are you seriously going to try and pull the religion card here? You know as well as everyone else here, that separation of church and state means literally that the sate can not tell you what you can and can not do in the name of your religion SO LONG AS IT DOES NOT HARM YOURSELF OR ANOTHER PERSON. For example, the state can (and does) forbid Sharia law in regards to forcing a women to do something against her will or for assaulting a women because she failed to wear her burka properly, etc. However, the wearing of a burka in no way shape or form harms anyone or takes away from their rights, thus they can not be denied the right to wear it as their religion DOES require them to do so

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 06:40 PM
Edited by Daniel74126 on Wed 01/06/16 06:41 PM
Like many other issues with Texas (and other states) you are wrong in regards to texas not allowing headgear to be worn when taking a drivers license photo; or at least in regards to them being able to legally enforce it. There are many cases NATIONWIDE where an individual has sued for discrimination and stereotyping, etc for being made to take off their hat.

Your initial spiel regarding military regs is also off base since it has no bearing on this matter (since we are discussing a VETERAN and not an active duty soldier). Once you are discharged from the military you can not be held to their standrds. The ONLY possible exception (and this is based off of point of view) is if you are reinstated to face court martial for actions performed while in service prior to discharge. Bu then, you have been reinstated thus you are active duty again and not a civilian, even if you did not agree to the change in status, so ;-)



Edit: also as a point of interest headgear IS allowed to be worn in side if you enter a building with your arms full or if you are bearing arms (handling a weapon) There are a few other exceptions to the rule as well but this should suffice in showing the facts.

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 02:49 AM
In regards to your question regarding background checks for the military, it is already a requirement for both state and federal criminal and mental health checks to be performed. You also have to get a physical / assessment from your personal physician stating that you have no history of mental health problems, and a suppressed juvenile record is STILL OPEN when it comes to military applicants, meaning it my have been suppressed due to being a minor, but it will be provided with your background checks.

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 02:41 AM
lol, seriously I look forward to any suggestions and comments. I try to keep my profile up to date and detailed, without turning it into a novel; but I also try and make my wants / expectations clear without insulting anyone. Any suggestions? ( I am SO tired of receiving "wanna hook up" emails, especially from women who are way outside the range I have specified lol)

Daniel74126's photo
Wed 01/06/16 01:31 AM
Do not forget that Governor Snyder also implemented back around 2011 changes to the Emergency Financial Manager law(s) that now allow the EFM to literally go in and fire all elected officials of the city they are overseeing and sit in their place, as well as barring the fired persons from running for any public office again for ten years...

I was part of the original movement back in early 2012 in Bay City to get signatures on a petition to revoke those very changes. We had way more than enough signatures and you know what happened? Governor Snyder got the petition tossed out in court due to it being typed up in the wrong size font.




HEIL SNYDER!!!