Community > Posts By > SassyEuro

 
no photo
Wed 04/22/15 05:00 PM

I have always had an interest in Men and Women, mainly swaying towards men as it's easier to meet them and seen as more conventional. Over the years, I've had my 'encounters' with several women, most of which have been great but few and far between. But with the invention of certain dating apps, it's become more socially acceptable to go looking for, and get, casual encounters. Can this ever be extended for women looking for women?


Welcome to Mingle2 .
I suggest you set your filters to women only & maybe your area. And message who you want to. * anyone that has gotten thru can get thru again. So dump / block at will.*

All those men volunteers offering to convert you or join in or just watch.... smokin will be headed your way.
Stay safe & good luck to you.



no photo
Wed 04/22/15 04:32 PM
slaphead
I'm confused ... OP, you are 11 years younger than I, so obviously, I have no idea what your asking.. but set your email restrictions/ filers... so the women 11 years younger than you aren't confused too. rofl

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 04:06 PM
Shedding light on Psychology's Dark Triad

psychologytoday.com/triad

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 03:37 PM

I don't have to life sex free... there is nothing wrong with my noodle now.. it doesn't need steroids ;)



Congrats- Stud Puppy... blushing
I did say " WHEN your hormone level drops" * keep my age in mind & the men who I might be dating... may have know MOSES.... rofl

Hormone levels in a man can drop as much as 50% by age 40. And then as much ad 10% each following year.. *someone or myself can check those stats later ..men really do ' change life ' *

Steroids increase body mass & aggression (male hormone), but actually cause erectile dysfunction & even sterility that can be permanent.
(Avoid weight lifters.... ladies) noway
* someone or myself can check that too... later *

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 03:07 PM
Sshhh... I'm hiding out, on here with Debbie...
flowers Hi Debbie... lol

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 03:03 PM
How is there so much military conversation? It is not a secret that the government/ tax payers pay for them to have a college education anyway.. slaphead
* going back to Debbie's birthday thread... stumbles out *

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 02:19 PM
Edited by SassyEuro on Wed 04/22/15 02:23 PM



hey folk,
i wanted to know from users of ED pills just how you like them. i have never used a pill before, but i have some just in case lol.

for those who have tried more than 1 pill type can you tell me the pros and cons of each as you felt it. how did your partner say there experience was.

has anyone had any negative side effect taking those pills ?

thx.


If you are healthy enough ... to take the pill take it. ( I only know about Viagra.). And discuss with a male urologist in conjunction with your PC.. how often a month you can take it.
Of course you have to plan your sexual activity with your partner in advance , & being spontaneous
goes out the window. But oh well...
That is better than no sex at all.
* And no- I don't know anyone that had a 4 hour erection. Dizziness, lightheadedness, blurred vision, YES*


I'll still pass on it.. Dizziness, lightheadedness, blurred vision.. sounds a lot like being on the verge of fainting.. which kills the moment.. and not very manly Lol


Then live sex free.. Is that manly?
I listed side effects that are not deadly, that I know of, like the OP asked.

.No sex..when your hormone level drops... is that manly?
Because that is the ONLY alternative.

And my experience with it... oh yes.... all man :banana:

And the side effects are after the workout / sex... I'm about to let him go for at least another hour. :wink:




no photo
Wed 04/22/15 01:56 PM



When a person defines a relationship as lite/easy/no strings then it is highly unlikely that the relationship is EVER going to be anything else. You set the value low it is unlikely to appreciate; or inflate; in any good way at least.

To have heartburn because you get disappointed that someone lived down to "low standards" agreed to is like crying that the dog ate your sandwich you left on the coffee table. A dog is going to be a dog.

Apology or confession that your a dog still makes you a dog. If you sleep with a dog you should at least expect fleas.

Younger women that think they can pretend to be casual about their self respect and probable responsibilities should not be surprised when the get stuck with the puppies of whatever hound dog they messed around with while he is long gone.


hey hey hey don't tlk about me like im not here.watch your mouth!

I guess since the guy is the dog, and because she was doing the same exact thing that would mean she is a dog(the female version) as well, who knows maybe she gave him fleaslaugh






" hey hey hey don't talk about me like I'm not here. watch you mouth!"

what We know you are here, you made the thread for everyone, & you put all your business out there.
The lady used a MEAPHOR for ALL young women.

* Medaphor-
1- a phrase or image which is applied to an object or action & is not literally applicable .
2-To compare to unlike objects.
3-- A word or phrase used to express that one object is similar to another.
4- An object, (symbol, word, phrase) or idea used as a symbol for something else.


no photo
Wed 04/22/15 10:12 AM
flowerforyou

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 09:51 AM
RAINN statistics

www.rain.org/statistics

smokin

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 08:28 AM

I am 21.I like to any type of relationships


Welcome,I have some suggestions..
fill put your profile/ interests & join us on forum conversation. So you get to know people & they get to know you.
Friends.. is always the best way to start. waving Good luck to you.


no photo
Wed 04/22/15 07:59 AM
Walmart shooting -55 min ago
Portsmouth
One man dead & unidentified in officer involved shooting.
www.13newsnow.com

Walmart shooting surveillance video
m.whio.com >videos>news>walmart- shooting


no photo
Wed 04/22/15 07:45 AM
MEET THE WALTON'S - Richest Family in America (2007, updated 3-14- 2014) Walmart.

Sam Walton's heirs, 6 living
1- Alice
2- Jim
3- Rob
4- Christy (widow of John Walton/ son of Sam Walton)
5- Nancy Walton Laurie
6- Anne Walton Kroenke

These heirs own over 42 % & are worth over $148.8 BILLION.
They are worth MORE than Warren Buffet & Bill Gates COMBINED.

Fortune 500 list- 2014 - Walmart
The world's largest company by revenue. 2.2 million employees worldwide. * numerous lawsuits & labor actions*

Walmart- the largest private employer in the USA.

walmart1percent.off
www.info wars.com
mobile.nytimes.com
www.new York times.com
The New York Times- Business Day
Fortune 500 Global List.
Business Insider

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 06:11 AM
Edited by SassyEuro on Wed 04/22/15 06:12 AM
We have far more control over our lives & who we let in it, than we think we do. This reaks of " chaos addiction" .



no photo
Wed 04/22/15 06:04 AM

hey folk,
i wanted to know from users of ED pills just how you like them. i have never used a pill before, but i have some just in case lol.

for those who have tried more than 1 pill type can you tell me the pros and cons of each as you felt it. how did your partner say there experience was.

has anyone had any negative side effect taking those pills ?

thx.


If you are healthy enough ... to take the pill take it. ( I only know about Viagra.). And discuss with a male urologist in conjunction with your PC.. how often a month you can take it.
Of course you have to plan your sexual activity with your partner in advance , & being spontaneous
goes out the window. But oh well...
That is better than no sex at all.
* And no- I don't know anyone that had a 4 hour erection. Dizziness, lightheadedness, blurred vision, YES*

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 05:51 AM
: :angel: Intercede but not church interference. :thumbsup:

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 05:47 AM
:angel: Again some of this is not scripitual & must be (?) Church doctrine, therefore opinion.

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 05:37 AM
Hummm.. Do you engage in conversation & debate.. at all?
You copy these posts from a preacher & some of which I disagree with with, because if is opinion & not biblical.
Just asking :angel:

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 05:22 AM






A colleague's brother is a doctor with like two years experience in one of the general hospitals.He helped deliver a woman who already has two children.During the post delivery treatment,the curious husband asked why his wife required such.The doctor told the hubby that the woman needed all the treatment since she is HIV positive.The husband was shocked as he didint know her status.In fact,she has been positive before they got married but she decieved the husband with fake medical report which stated she was negative.The man left and never returned.The doctor defended his actions as he claimed her file clearly stated she has HIV before marriage which is over 5 yrs and has been on drugs so he thought the hubby knew her status. The question is; Was it ethical to have disclosed the woman's status to her husband and if not,What are the likely consequences of his action?


Uh, it is difficult to answer the second question without knowing the pertinent laws in the nation where the doctor lives.

It is possible that the doctor assumed that the husband already knew about his wife's HIV.



True, we don't know the law there.
But assuming is STILL wrong.

Myself- while I was married. I had 2 different doctors call my husband in from the waiting room, while do the "Doctor patient post examination / testing consultation"
Without ASKING me. I was livid both times, told the doctor off , had my husband leave the room.

And this was for my heart.
But it was MY decision.
Not the doctors.
Not my husbands
My mothers
Or any one else.

It was a breech of confidentiality



Your situation was different. You were not dealing with a disease that could affect the health and welfare of others. Clearly this situation is a matter of spreading a known communicable disease! In the U.S. This was a quarantineable disease and would have been governed by the Center for Disease Control, in order to protect the general populous.


True, my case was different. Luckily there was nothing wrong with my heart. Which is partially my point. The doctor ASSUMED or wanted my (then) husband to know, even BEFORE I did. It was NOT his choice.

This woman in Africa had a FORM of the disease, yet was married for 5 yrs & successfully gave birth.
She may of had the form that was NOT contagious.





That could be the case, but all I know is that if I were going to marry a man I would want full disclosure of any disease I would possibly come in contact with. Whether or not it was contagious is what I consider a separate issue. The fact of the matter is that if she did not fully disclose her illness before marriage, it was basically because she did not find it necessary to be honest from the start. JMHO


I agree.I would want full disclosure also. Here is the USA marriages can be dissolved for not disclosing information that can effect the decision to marry or not. Because marriage is a contract.
If one was previously married and did not let the part know in advance.
If there are children involved and the partner did not know.

Myself, I broke an engagement because he was not only previously married, but had a illegitimate daughter, by another woman in another state. It took him 18 months to tell me... noway .

See ya.. have s nice life. laugh

no photo
Wed 04/22/15 04:53 AM
Edited by SassyEuro on Wed 04/22/15 04:55 AM




A colleague's brother is a doctor with like two years experience in one of the general hospitals.He helped deliver a woman who already has two children.During the post delivery treatment,the curious husband asked why his wife required such.The doctor told the hubby that the woman needed all the treatment since she is HIV positive.The husband was shocked as he didint know her status.In fact,she has been positive before they got married but she decieved the husband with fake medical report which stated she was negative.The man left and never returned.The doctor defended his actions as he claimed her file clearly stated she has HIV before marriage which is over 5 yrs and has been on drugs so he thought the hubby knew her status. The question is; Was it ethical to have disclosed the woman's status to her husband and if not,What are the likely consequences of his action?


Uh, it is difficult to answer the second question without knowing the pertinent laws in the nation where the doctor lives.

It is possible that the doctor assumed that the husband already knew about his wife's HIV.



True, we don't know the law there.
But assuming is STILL wrong.

Myself- while I was married. I had 2 different doctors call my husband in from the waiting room, while do the "Doctor patient post examination / testing consultation"
Without ASKING me. I was livid both times, told the doctor off , had my husband leave the room.

And this was for my heart.
But it was MY decision.
Not the doctors.
Not my husbands
My mothers
Or any one else.

It was a breech of confidentiality



Your situation was different. You were not dealing with a disease that could affect the health and welfare of others. Clearly this situation is a matter of spreading a known communicable disease! In the U.S. This was a quarantineable disease and would have been governed by the Center for Disease Control, in order to protect the general populous.


True, my case was different. Luckily there was nothing wrong with my heart. Which is partially my point. The doctor ASSUMED or wanted my (then) husband to know, even BEFORE I did. It was NOT his choice.

This woman in Africa had a FORM of the disease, yet was married for 5 yrs & successfully gave birth.
She may of had the form that was NOT contagious.



1 2 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 24 25