Topic: Ripped Off Again | |
---|---|
a lot of the fuel cost is when you are setting
and it is real cold or real hot gotta remember the semi is the drivers home away from home needs it for heat and for cooling and the bottom line for product rip off is the increasing fuel cost if you got it more than likely it was on a truck somewhere umm...how is that related to my point? |
|
|
|
Edited by
Single_Rob
on
Fri 03/14/08 03:55 PM
|
|
you guys do know that most of europe is spending 3 times as much as us on gas, right? meh..get more efficient cars good for them. They are also a completely different society than we are. They can have all the socialism they want, but there are going to be some problems coming up shortly when they try to force it over here. At least I hope there will be .....and as far as fuel eficiency, i cannot do anything about what my business demands I use |
|
|
|
you guys do know that most of europe is spending 3 times as much as us on gas, right? meh..get more efficient cars mine get 40+now and i was looking into a truck that gets 60 mpg but not sure it is licensable |
|
|
|
a lot of the fuel cost is when you are setting
and it is real cold or real hot gotta remember the semi is the drivers home away from home needs it for heat and for cooling and the bottom line for product rip off is the increasing fuel cost if you got it more than likely it was on a truck somewhere umm...how is that related to my point? cost of fuel raises the price of everything and aerodynamics only increase mpg when the truck is moving |
|
|
|
you guys do know that most of europe is spending 3 times as much as us on gas, right? meh..get more efficient cars good for them. They are also a completely different society than we are. They can have all the socialism they want, but there are going to be some problems coming up shortly when they try to force it over here. At least I hope there will be ..... |
|
|
|
you guys do know that most of europe is spending 3 times as much as us on gas, right? meh..get more efficient cars good for them. They are also a completely different society than we are. They can have all the socialism they want, but there are going to be some problems coming up shortly when they try to force it over here. At least I hope there will be ..... exactly the point I was trying to make. Two different societies |
|
|
|
you guys do know that most of europe is spending 3 times as much as us on gas, right? meh..get more efficient cars and in europe if you drive 200 miles yer in another country in the states yer just over yonder |
|
|
|
cost of fuel raises the price of everything
and aerodynamics only increase mpg when the truck is moving of course aerodynamics only help while the truck is moving... why are you debating me on this? imo, there should be very little interstate truck driving. trains are more efficient good for them. They are also a completely different society than we are. They can have all the socialism they want, but there are going to be some problems coming up shortly when they try to force it over here. At least I hope there will be .....and as far as fuel eficiency, i cannot do anything about what my business demands I use
nice irrelivant rant.. |
|
|
|
exactly the point I was trying to make. Two different societies
it's not the society that demands their higher mpg vehicles, it's their resources. |
|
|
|
Gas prices & bundle cable bill. I feel ripped off about those two the most.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Fri 03/14/08 04:07 PM
|
|
imo, there should be very little interstate truck driving. trains are more efficient a truck can pick up a load in long beach and have it in nyc in 4 days atrain maybe 4 weeks and it is thrown all over the container thus making it a hazard to unload |
|
|
|
The marriage to my ex-wife. She screwed up 16 years of my live and cost me about a quarter million dollars.
|
|
|
|
a truck can pick up a load in long beach
and have it in nyc in 4 days atrain maybe 4 weeks and it is thrown all over the container thus making it a hazard to unload and there's no solution for this? cmon |
|
|
|
cost of fuel raises the price of everything
and aerodynamics only increase mpg when the truck is moving of course aerodynamics only help while the truck is moving... why are you debating me on this? imo, there should be very little interstate truck driving. trains are more efficient good for them. They are also a completely different society than we are. They can have all the socialism they want, but there are going to be some problems coming up shortly when they try to force it over here. At least I hope there will be .....and as far as fuel eficiency, i cannot do anything about what my business demands I use
nice irrelivant rant.. how is irrevelant? You brought the prices in europe up, and I eplained the difference. How is it not relevant |
|
|
|
Let me count the ways............
|
|
|
|
a truck can pick up a load in long beach
and have it in nyc in 4 days atrain maybe 4 weeks and it is thrown all over the container thus making it a hazard to unload and there's no solution for this? cmon but you are the one that said it was better by train you tell us well the best solution would be to have a terminal every 5 hours and relay the loads but would probably ad 2 day to transite time |
|
|
|
how is irrevelant? You brought the prices in europe up, and I eplained the difference. How is it not relevant
you brought up their social and political climate, when that isn't the reason for their high gas prices or ways of adjusting to it. we have much greater resources than most every other nation in the world, and it has caused us to have a "throw away" mentality. did you know that in germany they charge you not only to bring water into your house but also to flush or drain it away? it's because of their resources, not politics |
|
|
|
but you are the one that said it was better by train
you tell us well the best solution would be to have a terminal every 5 hours and relay the loads but would probably ad 2 day to transite time what i said was that there should be very little interstate transport via trucks. some things can't be helped, but what you described sounds like a loading issue. the loads should be more secure. and if our railways weren't lacking so severely, it wouldn't take nearly as long |
|
|
|
The marriage to my ex-wife. She screwed up 16 years of my live and cost me about a quarter million dollars. Wow. Bitter much? I wonder how she talks about you. |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Fri 03/14/08 04:22 PM
|
|
but you are the one that said it was better by train
you tell us well the best solution would be to have a terminal every 5 hours and relay the loads but would probably ad 2 day to transite time what i said was that there should be very little interstate transport via trucks. some things can't be helped, but what you described sounds like a loading issue. the loads should be more secure. and if our railways weren't lacking so severely, it wouldn't take nearly as long how long do you think it takes too switch train cars around at each railyard hub the issue is not with loading or the same thing would happen when it is moved by truck but it doesn't and this is what you said imo, there should be very little interstate truck driving. trains are more efficient |
|
|