really, Mirror?

there are many others. They all embrace one peculiarity. The abstencion of Christ being the Living Word of God. Being with the Creator at creation.

So, validity is relative in your mind. It excuses the possibility that the others are false in their representation of the content and character of the Creator. It also affirms that Christ is not democratically relevant in your mind, nor is he seen in the same light as the others.

Most notably Judaism and Islam hold that he is not God and they would represent the majority opinion were this a democratic ballot of preferences.

So far, democratic balloting is on your side, judging from my last two paragraphs, mirror.

But what's at issue here is not whether I speak of that which I know, but that I don't affirm gods that I don't know.

I assume that you are implying that you know many gods, mirror.

I assure you that you do not know my God. It is evident by your contempt of Jesus.

So, let's be certain that we understand the mirror.

Christ Jesus is not appropriate nor germaine to religion and philosophical discussions but everything under the sun that is not about Jesus Christ is welcome and tolerable in the rear view of the mirror.

You make no sense.

By your own admission, there does after all seem to be some relevance to religion exhibited in this thread, yet Christ's relevance on Western thought is of no consequence even though the battle of wits in the field of psychology is all about the misapprehensions of Christian thought as though the sequestering of free discourse is somehow disallowed in the way of life of the willing that neither hinder nor disturb such discourses and explorations that credit their efforts with disproving the very misapprehensions that were posited for such premise of thought exclusive of the allure of Christian thought.

The hearts and minds finding affinity with Christ's teachings outnumber and exceed those that refute it as a valid reference point for premising the conflict that would erase its efficacy from te face of the earth.

Yet, the psychologists and their learned academia seek to continually affirm Christian thought and its fruits as valid through accreditation and acceptance within the fray as beneficial and therapeutic when applied in part to therapy.

ergo, licensed christian psychology.

sit down and relax.

You will learn more.

Don't mind me, I just dropped by to soak up the overabundance of love here.



Carry on.

Evolution is dependent on refuting the Biblical claim that man was created as man and placed here along with everything else at the point in time appointed. That is anti-thetical and predicated on assumptions not material fact.

Any and all convergences in any of the three disciplines you seek to emulate as mutually exclusive of Christian thought is incomplete without its influence and place in understanding man and his uniqueness.

Well now, as you narrow down your interest you appear to be engaging in a hijjack of the thread and supposing upon it that human and Christian psychology are not about what? humans?

Again, you make no sense in your redundant statements, mirror.

So, all religions claim to be the one rtrue religion and that does not seem strange to you?

You still haven't made a point.

You continue to make no credible sense nor do seem capable of articulating just what in fact is your reason for being here except to not like the tenor of one of the points of view which, BTW, is part of the whole.