Topic: Should a soldier....... | |
---|---|
Do you believe that a soldier (does not matter which branch of the service) should have more say in what he or she is ordered to do? In other words, should a soldier have the right to refuse to do something simply because they dont want to, or they dont agree with the person giving the order?
Or should they just shut their mouths and do what they are told, no matter what? Please discuss.... |
|
|
|
Do you believe that a soldier (does not matter which branch of the service) should have more say in what he or she is ordered to do? In other words, should a soldier have the right to refuse to do something simply because they dont want to, or they dont agree with the person giving the order? Or should they just shut their mouths and do what they are told, no matter what? Please discuss.... Soldiers are trained to follow not lead, they should do as they are told regardless. A soldier can become a leader, but they must follow before they lead. |
|
|
|
Edited by
briank66
on
Tue 01/22/08 09:04 PM
|
|
Do you believe that a soldier (does not matter which branch of the service) should have more say in what he or she is ordered to do? In other words, should a soldier have the right to refuse to do something simply because they dont want to, or they dont agree with the person giving the order? Or should they just shut their mouths and do what they are told, no matter what? Please discuss.... WTF...? You are kidding....right????? |
|
|
|
Do you believe that a soldier (does not matter which branch of the service) should have more say in what he or she is ordered to do? In other words, should a soldier have the right to refuse to do something simply because they dont want to, or they dont agree with the person giving the order? Or should they just shut their mouths and do what they are told, no matter what? Please discuss.... This time around!!!!! I feel, they shouldn't have to do what they're told!!!! We're solving nothing over there, It's pointless. Bush, needs a reality check |
|
|
|
when a person signs there name on the line they make a contract. in that contract they willing give up there right to refuse a lawfull order.
imagine the chaos if they ccould just refuse to do something becuase they dont want too |
|
|
|
The person that is giving the order is in that position for a reason. Just do what you're told, easiest job ever. If I told someone to engage a enemy and they refused, they are endangering myself and everyone else there
|
|
|
|
They know what they signed for, however, if something is against the Geneva conventions, they have the right to refuse orders. If caught doing something against the Geneva conventions, they can suffer worse consequenses for those actions.
|
|
|
|
This can not be answered with just a yes or no... without any specifics....
So should a child not take directives from there parents.... or disregard and do as they feel... it is the same sceneriao... the military is a job.... those actions in the working world would be cause for termination,.... correct... |
|
|
|
when a person signs there name on the line they make a contract. in that contract they willing give up there right to refuse a lawfull order. imagine the chaos if they ccould just refuse to do something becuase they dont want too Yeah ur right!!! But, still I hate Bush :) |
|
|
|
yes i was in the military. yea i thought some of the orders i got where stupid. BUT i did follow the orders that where given
|
|
|
|
If caught doing something against the Geneva conventions, they can suffer worse consequenses for those actions. Those "rules" are loosely followed |
|
|
|
I could never be a soldier........Id be telling the guy to fukc off all the time!!!
|
|
|
|
The person that is giving the order is in that position for a reason. Just do what you're told, easiest job ever. If I told someone to engage a enemy and they refused, they are endangering myself and everyone else there i totally agree |
|
|
|
Do you believe that a soldier (does not matter which branch of the service) should have more say in what he or she is ordered to do? In other words, should a soldier have the right to refuse to do something simply because they dont want to, or they dont agree with the person giving the order? Or should they just shut their mouths and do what they are told, no matter what? Please discuss.... Stand, jump in the pool and hope you can swim...cower, and hope your led the right direction...my opinion. |
|
|
|
Edited by
mdl7070
on
Tue 01/22/08 09:11 PM
|
|
when a person signs there name on the line they make a contract. in that contract they willing give up there right to refuse a lawfull order. imagine the chaos if they ccould just refuse to do something becuase they dont want too Yeah ur right!!! But, still I hate Bush :) it isnt about your opinion of bush. when they go in the military it is by choice. |
|
|
|
I understand that we are pretty much the only country that follows the Geneva Convention.
Is it really that loose in how Americans react to it? |
|
|
|
Yeah ur right!!! But, still I hate Bush :) Doesn't everyone....? |
|
|
|
when a person signs there name on the line they make a contract. in that contract they willing give up there right to refuse a lawfull order. imagine the chaos if they ccould just refuse to do something becuase they dont want too Yeah ur right!!! But, still I hate Bush :) it isnt about your opinion of bush. when they go in the military it is by choice. Yes sir, I know that!!!! I'm just sayin |
|
|
|
The person that is giving the order is in that position for a reason. Just do what you're told, easiest job ever. If I told someone to engage a enemy and they refused, they are endangering myself and everyone else there thank you for your service to this country.... |
|
|
|
Edited by
Redhat11
on
Tue 01/22/08 09:15 PM
|
|
In reference to the geneva conventions:
"It is forbidden to use weapons or methods of warfare that are likely to cause unnecessary losses or excessive suffering." We drop bombs all over a city. "It is forbidden to kill or wound an adversary who surrenders or who can no longer take part in the fighting" Definately not followed often |
|
|