Topic: Thank God for Mike Rogers at the NSA
T.Roy 's photo
Tue 02/19/19 11:40 AM



Did you know that ONE MAN, Mike Rogers, was all that stopped the crooks who wanted to overthrow and utterly destroy of our nation? Corruption at the highest levels needs to be prosecuted until they are all wearing orange jump suits in a 8x8 with Bubba.


Here's how it happened:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_aevtHHULag&t=265s

msharmony's photo
Tue 02/19/19 12:18 PM
I swear these threads should be paid sponsors of Youtube, all the free press they give it.

lost me at 'utterly destroy the nation'

its right up there with 'make America great again'


both dramatic and vague at the same time.

T.Roy 's photo
Tue 02/19/19 07:47 PM

I swear these threads should be paid sponsors of Youtube, all the free press they give it.

lost me at 'utterly destroy the nation'

its right up there with 'make America great again'


both dramatic and vague at the same time.



Yet you still avoid dealing with the substance known as FACT when it's offered.


Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it isn't true. It's silly that your best argument is "it's on youtube" like every single outlet you get your news from also does.

that's just hilarious if it weren't so pathetically sad....



msharmony's photo
Tue 02/19/19 08:30 PM


I swear these threads should be paid sponsors of Youtube, all the free press they give it.

lost me at 'utterly destroy the nation'

its right up there with 'make America great again'


both dramatic and vague at the same time.



Yet you still avoid dealing with the substance known as FACT when it's offered.


Just because you don't like it, doesn't mean it isn't true. It's silly that your best argument is "it's on youtube" like every single outlet you get your news from also does.

that's just hilarious if it weren't so pathetically sad....





no. The sources I use do NOT get the information from Youtube ...lol.

It doesnt make it not true if I dont like it. It just makes it random, unverifiable, and less credible, than an actual NEWS source that must adhere to laws and regulations or risk slander or libel suits ....lol.

T.Roy 's photo
Tue 02/19/19 09:33 PM
Edited by T.Roy on Tue 02/19/19 09:40 PM



https://www.youtube.com/user/NBC
https://www.youtube.com/user/CNN
https://www.youtube.com/user/CBS
https://www.youtube.com/user/ABCNews


According to you, just the fact they are on YouTube discredits them.



Not one of these YOUTUBE NEWS SOURCES have attempted to discredit Dan Boingino. You know why...because it's true.

Put your head back in the sand before you see it.....



.

msharmony's photo
Tue 02/19/19 09:50 PM
Edited by msharmony on Tue 02/19/19 09:52 PM




https://www.youtube.com/user/NBC
https://www.youtube.com/user/CNN
https://www.youtube.com/user/CBS
https://www.youtube.com/user/ABCNews


According to you, just the fact they are on YouTube discredits them.



Not one of these YOUTUBE NEWS SOURCES have attempted to discredit Dan Boingino. You know why...because it's true.

Put your head back in the sand before you see it.....



.



not one of them gives credibility to Dan Boingono either. anyone with an opinion can post a Facebook video.


The fact that they are on Facebook doesnt discredit them. the fact that they are on Facebook from a non accredited RANDOM individual makes their credibility HIGHLY questionable compared to those from REGULATED news sources, subject to lawsuits for large sums of money, like CNN, NBC, FOX, or any other NATIONALLY SYNDICATED source.



Facebook can also INCLUDE videos that are posted from already accredited news sources which have regulations to follow, UNLIKE random INDIDIVUAL posters. When someone sends me to such a RANDOM INDIVIDUAL on Facebook, I am not interested due to the lack of accountability an INDIVIDUAL has when they post video. Got it?


T.Roy 's photo
Wed 02/20/19 03:54 AM
Edited by T.Roy on Wed 02/20/19 03:58 AM



not one of them gives credibility to Dan Boingono either.




how could they without having any of their own?


They don't hire "random" at the NYPD. They don't hire "random" in the Secret Service.

He's run for the Senate in Maryland, won the GOP primaries but lost the election in the liberal state.

Has a nationwide radio program.

He has more integrity than the top 98% of Democrats.


Nevermind....as long your side continues ignoring the truth, you'll remain in the dark about why you keep losing elections. That makes America happy.




.

msharmony's photo
Wed 02/20/19 08:19 AM




not one of them gives credibility to Dan Boingono either.




how could they without having any of their own?


They don't hire "random" at the NYPD. They don't hire "random" in the Secret Service.

He's run for the Senate in Maryland, won the GOP primaries but lost the election in the liberal state.

Has a nationwide radio program.

He has more integrity than the top 98% of Democrats.


Nevermind....as long your side continues ignoring the truth, you'll remain in the dark about why you keep losing elections. That makes America happy.




.



youre funny dude. laugh

why put forth the question of whether they gave credibility and then deny they had credibility to give?

smh

and if all it takes to prove 'integrity' for you is to be hired in certain jobs and develop or contract a radio program, that explains alot about your judgment.

And for the record, Republicans and democrats win some and lose some. The extremist views really need to take a break.


T.Roy 's photo
Wed 02/20/19 07:03 PM





not one of them gives credibility to Dan Boingono either.




how could they without having any of their own?


They don't hire "random" at the NYPD. They don't hire "random" in the Secret Service.

He's run for the Senate in Maryland, won the GOP primaries but lost the election in the liberal state.

Has a nationwide radio program.

He has more integrity than the top 98% of Democrats.


Nevermind....as long your side continues ignoring the truth, you'll remain in the dark about why you keep losing elections. That makes America happy.




.



youre funny dude. laugh

why put forth the question of whether they gave credibility and then deny they had credibility to give?

smh

and if all it takes to prove 'integrity' for you is to be hired in certain jobs and develop or contract a radio program, that explains alot about your judgment.

And for the record, Republicans and democrats win some and lose some. The extremist views really need to take a break.






I was simply pointing out that your characterization of an ACTUAL eye witness as "random" was flawed and nothing more than misdirection to avoid even looking for the truth.

I got more misdirection, as typical, but the point stands.



.

hardBNhard's photo
Wed 02/20/19 07:45 PM
You know what else you will find on youtube ?
That over 9 million people have signed on at
>>> NEEDTOIMPEACH.COM >>># needtoimpeach