Topic: Who do you THINK will get SCOTUS appointment? | |
---|---|
Edited by
Toodygirl5
on
Wed 07/11/18 12:55 PM
|
|
But yet they would open their arms for traitor Obama..or pedophile Billy..makes ya wonder don't it..
You're confusing your presidents. Clinton was not the one that said he wanted to nail his own daughter. Let's stick to Trump's postive efforts of running the US ! How many have dirty laundry before being in government offices including previous presidents anyway!!!. |
|
|
|
Edited by
tombraider
on
Wed 07/11/18 12:57 PM
|
|
I believe he said "if she wasn't his daughter he'd be dating her"..I didn't hear him say he would be having sex with her..but still that's if she wasn't his daughter..a big difference ..so what if the guy has a weird sense of humor ..doing and saying are two different things...I never heard him say he would nail her..and neither did you..unbelievable |
|
|
|
Edited by
Toodygirl5
on
Wed 07/11/18 12:57 PM
|
|
Exactly!
And fake news likes to report negative comments on Trump daily. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Viper1j
on
Wed 07/11/18 01:04 PM
|
|
But yet they would open their arms for traitor Obama..or pedophile Billy..makes ya wonder don't it..
You're confusing your presidents. Clinton was not the one that said he wanted to nail his own daughter. Let's stick to Trump's postive efforts of running the US ! How many have dirty laundry before being in government offices including previous presidents anyway!!!. I'm not really sure.. I suppose you could ask Stormy Daniels or Billy Bush or Barbara Moore or Karen McDougal... One of them could probably tell you. I believe he said "if she wasn't his daughter he'd be dating her"..I didn't hear him say he would be having sex with her..but still that's if she wasn't his daughter..a big difference ..so what if the guy has a weird sense of humor ..doing and saying are two different things...I never heard him say he would nail her..and neither did you..unbelievable
Speaking as the father of two daughters, if my own son-in-law called my kid a "nice piece of a--, he and I would go a few rounds. Want to blow this off as a "bad joke" too? https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-ivanka-piece-of-***-howard-stern-229376 Trump told Howard Stern it's OK to call Ivanka a 'piece of a--' Donald Trump told radio host Howard Stern in 2004 that it was okay for the shock jock to refer to the Manhattan billionaire’s daughter Ivanka Trump as “a piece of ***.” The exchange was uncovered by CNN, which published that clip and others on Saturday from Stern’s radio show. The publication of the exchange comes one day after The Washington Post published a recording of Trump making crude, sexual remarks about women, including a statement that he “did try and ****” a married woman and a declaration that he often got away with groping women because “when you’re a star they let you do it.” In the 2005 clip published by the Post, Trump told Access Hollywood host Billy Bush he would “grab [women] by the *****" and added that "you can do anything" to them. In the 2004 interview with Stern, Trump tells the host that "My daughter is beautiful, Ivanka," to which Stern interjects, “by the way, your daughter.” Trump finishes Stern’s sentence by repeating “she’s beautiful.” “Can I say this? A piece of ***,” Stern says in the clip. “Yeah,” Trump replies. In another clip uncovered by CNN, this one from 2006, Stern asks Trump, “did your daughter get breast implants?” The real estate mogul replied that “no, she didn’t. I mean, I would know if she did. The answer is no. Why, did she look a little more stacked?” “She looks more voluptuous than ever,” Stern said. “No, she didn’t get them,” Trump said. “She’s actually always been very voluptuous.” Among the other clips from Stern’s radio show unearthed by CNN is one in which Trump says “check out time” for relationships with women is when they turn 35. In another, he discusses having sex with women who are menstruating and in yet another, he brags about having had group sex. Trump’s past appearances on Stern’s radio show have been a source of regular political headaches for the GOP nominee. He told the shock jock on air in 2002 that he would support a U.S. invasion into Iraq, comments that have been used to debunk Trump’s campaign trail claim that he was always opposed to the 2003 invasion. |
|
|
|
When you think of all this fake news and twisted words not to mention the attacks on him and his staff that the president has had to contend with it's a wonder he's been able to get anything done and yet he has..more than a lot of the past presidents and in a shorter amount of time..and all the while Mad Maxine has been spewing out her discriminating comments..since when can people be denied service because of their political views and it not be considered discrimination..maybe people ought to just start filing lawsuits aginst these business owners until they get the message..why they haven't is beyond me... |
|
|
|
Edited by
Viper1j
on
Wed 07/11/18 01:10 PM
|
|
When you think of all this fake news and twisted words not to mention the attacks on him and his staff that the president has had to contend with it's a wonder he's been able to get anything done and yet he has..more than a lot of the past presidents and in a shorter amount of time..and all the while Mad Maxine has been spewing out her discriminating comments..since when can people be denied service because of their political views and it not be considered discrimination..maybe people ought to just start filing lawsuits aginst these business owners until they get the message..why they haven't is beyond me... https://www.mydoorsign.com/blog/right-to-refuse-service-to-anyone/ Under federal anti-discrimination laws, businesses can refuse service to any person for any reason, unless the business is discriminating against a protected class. At the national level, protected classes include: Race or color. National origin or citizenship status.Mar 21, 2017 Working for a dictator is not a "protected class". |
|
|
|
Stormy Daniels a paid prostitute looking for publicity and more money..my her child must be proud of her..and yes I can pass it off as a bad joke..it's a free country or haven't you heard..so you don't like it that's your opinion and we're all entitled ..so what we've determined we all have a right to have our own opinion..whether others like it or not..so from all this we have determined we all have a right to our own opinion..I think that was determined a long time ago. by greater minds than ours so what's the point..you don't like it..oh well..there's a lot of things we don't like who cares..it's not a reason to impeach a president..rather petty in comparison to what job he has to do..Now if it affected the safety of the country I would say you have something there but all I see is grounds for a petty argument..and in the grand scheme of things means ABSOLUTELY nothing.. |
|
|
|
President Trump apparently owns you Viper.
You are absolutely obsessed with him. So I guess this is how it is going to be the next 6 and a half years. Oh, RBG will not last that long. Cannot wait to see who he nominates at that time. |
|
|
|
He only has less than a year. That's about how long we have to tolerate. He will be picking any more Supreme Court justices. Bobby Mueller will finish, present his findings, he'll be impeached, and then you'll be indicted, tried, and convicted.
Good news would be a lot of time in prison. The tails side of that particular coin, would be a firing squad for high treason. In the meantime, Hang In There Baby! November is right around the corner! |
|
|
|
Edited by
tombraider
on
Wed 07/11/18 01:28 PM
|
|
READ THIS VIPER DISCRIMINATION In human social affairs, discrimination is treatment or consideration of, or making a distinction in favor of or against, a person based on the group, class, or category to which the person is perceived to belong. These include age, colour, convictions for which a pardon has been granted or a record suspended, disability, ethnicity, family status, gender identity, genetic characteristics, marital status, nationality, race, religion, sex, and sexual orientation. Discrimination consists of treatment of an individual or group, based on their actual or perceived membership in a certain group or social category, "in a way that is worse than the way people are usually treated". It involves the group's initial reaction or interaction going on to influence the individual's actual behavior towards the group leader or the group, restricting members of one group from opportunities or privileges that are available to another group, leading to the exclusion of the individual or entities based on illogical or irrational decision making. on the right side of the page for the definition of discrimination.. I think this makes my point |
|
|
|
Edited by
Viper1j
on
Wed 07/11/18 01:36 PM
|
|
And? I have no problem with that. Once upon a time, discrimination was a good thing.
It was considered a complement for someone to say that you had "discriminating tastes". If you choose between ketchup and mustard on your hot dog, you have discriminated. What the law talks about is "unlawful discrimination". And the law has stated that there will be a "protected class of individuals, against which discrimination shall be deemed illegal". Working for a dictator, does not fall into any "protected class". Having political beliefs that differ from the owner of a restaurant, bakery, dry cleaners, or even the CEO of an airline, does not fall into a "protected class of individuals". Hope that helps. |
|
|
|
Mueller has nothing.
Will you go outside and scream at the sky when they close that witch hunt? |
|
|
|
Nah.. I'm nowhere near Las Vegas..
|
|
|
|
You belong in Russia.
|
|
|
|
I'm not trump.
|
|
|
|
You wish you were in your delusional state.
You are obsessed with him. |
|
|
|
And? I have no problem with that. Once upon a time, discrimination was a good thing. It was considered a complement for someone to say that you had "discriminating tastes". If you choose between ketchup and mustard on your hot dog, you have discriminated. What the law talks about is "unlawful discrimination". And the law has stated that there will be a "protected class of individuals, against which discrimination shall be deemed illegal". Working for a dictator, does not fall into any "protected class". Having political beliefs that differ from the owner of a restaurant, bakery, dry cleaners, or even the CEO of an airline, does not fall into a "protected class of individuals". Hope that helps. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Viper1j
on
Thu 07/12/18 11:50 AM
|
|
Those colleges that subscribe to that kind of enrollment practices should be burnt to the ground. Why? It's not like whites can get in! 6 year olds know what US territories are. https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/12/us/illinois-puerto-rico-park-officer/index.html Officer resigns after not helping woman harassed for wearing a Puerto Rico flag shirt An Illinois police officer has resigned after being criticized for not intervening as a man harassed a woman for wearing a Puerto Rican flag shirt. In the incident caught on video at a northwestern Chicago park last month, the woman pleads for help as a man harasses her, saying her shirt is un-American. The officer initially appears to ignore the pleas. Mia Irizarry says she was celebrating her 24th birthday at Caldwell Woods park when the man approached her and asked her why she was wearing the sleeveless Puerto Rico flag shirt. It also had "Puerto Rico" written below the neckline. Irizarry recorded the encounter on her phone, saying she felt threatened, and posted the video to Facebook. On Monday, Forest Preserves of Cook County, which administers the park, tweeted that it was aware of the June 14 incident and video, and that it had launched an investigation. The Cook County Forest Preserve District police officer, Patrick Conner, resigned Wednesday, and the investigation into the incident continues, the agency said. An attorney for the Illinois Fraternal Order of Police Labor Council, which is representing Conner, said that the video "does not look good," but cautioned that the video may not tell the whole story. "We don't know what was happening outside the video; we don't know what was going on inside his (Conner's) head at the time," the attorney, Tamara Cummings, said Thursday. "He was looking forward to an opportunity to explain what was happening. However, given the media attention and pressure, he decided to resign." "Given his decision to resign, he won't be offering any additional comment on what might have happened during this situation," she said. "He's very distraught and not happy about having to leave employment much sooner than he intended, but because of the strong reaction from the public and political figures, he thought it would be unrealistic to stay as an officer." The preserve district police chief, Kelvin Pope, said he didn't know why Conner apparently didn't step in initially. Pope said Conner feels "he wasn't given a fair shake," and that "he was very remorseful." But Conner resigned before investigators could ask him what happened during a disciplinary hearing, Pope said at a news conference Thursday. "(Conner's) personnel file will reflect that this officer did not resign in good standing, with a note indicating that he left the district with discipline pending," the park agency's general superintendent, Arnold Randall, said. Prosecutors considering hate crime charges Timothy G. Trybus, the man police say harassed Irizarry, was arrested on the day of the incident on charges of assault and disorderly conduct, according to a police report. The report alleges he was intoxicated. Trybus is scheduled for his first court appearance August 1, the Cook County Circuit Court said. Prosecutors are considering whether to file hate crime charges in the case, Cook County state's attorney's spokeswoman Tandra Simonton said Thursday. Cook County Commissioner Jesús "Chuy" García had called for such charges against Trybus a day earlier. "A charge for simple assault or disorderly conduct is not sufficient," García said. "We cannot allow that ugly rhetoric to be the norm in Cook County." Trybus will be represented by a public defender, but one has not been assigned to him yet, the public defender's office said. CNN has attempted to reach Trybus for comment. Randall, the forest preserves superintendent, said his agency has apologized to Irizarry and refunded the money she had paid for a permit to gather at a picnic table area on the day of the incident. He said his agency would re-examine the diversity training for its officers and other employees. "It's up to each and every one of us to present a better model to demonstrate with our own actions how to treat each other with more respect," he told reporters Thursday. "We might start with the fine example presented by Mia Irizarry and her family, who handled this ugly incident with great composure, never stooping to the level of the man who attacked her." The incident In the footage, a man can be seen approaching Irizarry saying: "You should not be wearing that in the United States of America." He gets closer to her and asks "Are you a citizen? Are you a United States citizen?" Irizarry says Puerto Rico is part of the United States and the man approaches her multiple times. She asks a park police officer to help, saying, "I am renting this area and he's harassing me about the shirt that I'm wearing." Later she says: "Officer, I feel entirely uncomfortable, can you remove ... please officer" as the officer is seen walking away from her. Then she says: "Officer, I'm renting, I paid for a permit for this area. I do not feel comfortable with him here, is there anything you can do?" The officer can then be seen talking to the man who gesticulates back and tells him to "shut the f*** up." More police arrive and Irizarry says she still doesn't feel safe. The man resumes his abuse, saying: "You're not American, if you were American you wouldn't wear that. You know that right?" A female officer asks to see his ID and can be heard telling him that he's intoxicated, to which he replies, "Well that's your judgment." She explains that Irizarry has a permit and she warns him that he could be arrested "for not being compliant." "You don't come here harassing people," the officer continues. "People have just as much right to be here as you and when you're drunk, you don't belong here." The female officer then speaks with Irizarry, who gives her version of the incident and the officer explains that they were called to the area after a report that a man was choking a woman. Eventually the first officer on the scene takes notes of Irizarry's account of the incident and says that he was at the scene due to the separate incident, noting that she was not being attacked though acknowledging she felt threatened. Irizarry can be heard explaining to the officer that the incident began when they had asked the group the man was in if they could move as they had a permit for the area. She said the group politely complied but her Puerto Rico shirt appeared to act as a trigger to the man. Puerto Rico is a US commonwealth with its own constitution, rather than a state. Puerto Rican residents have been American citizens since 1917 and have the right to vote in US presidential primaries, but not in presidential elections. |
|
|
|
You say that white people can't get into college. Care to explain why? Besides being a blatant racist statement.
|
|
|
|
You're right.. That was totally incorrect. I meant to say Trumpanzees can't make the grade. Obviously many whites have high educations.
|
|
|