Topic: Cortez/Crowley | |
---|---|
When the story first aired it was Medicaid for all, then changed to Medicare. I pretty sure you have to be 65 to recieve Medicare. I think they are trying to clean up her promises a bit. Hopefully their are enough working people in that distric that a Republican is elected. Doesn't look hopeful for that area.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
diserli_gears
on
Sun 07/01/18 06:56 AM
|
|
When the story first aired it was Medicaid for all, then changed to Medicare. I pretty sure you have to be 65 to recieve Medicare. I think they are trying to clean up her promises a bit. Hopefully their are enough working people in that distric that a Republican is elected. Doesn't look hopeful for that area. no she said medicare, Medicare in the states is 65 and older, Medicare she is talking about is what goes in my country in Canada, we have Medicare which means Single payer system funded by the government for all citizens (except illegals) Its called Medicare here, same as in the UK.Australia,Taiwan. what ms.orcasio-cortez doesnt get it is, when you have medicare for all people citizens and undocumented you get the basics yes but its at a cost, for instance in the UK, look at the Charlie Gard case, the poor child that died because the British healthcare system refused to treat him because it was too expensive to treat his rare disease. And if you're old or too obese, good luck , ask any of our British posters what their hospitals are like compared to the American hospitals. I suggest Ms. Orcasio-Cortez take a trip to the UK and visit a hospital and see for herself. For the leftist and Democrats who wants a single payer health system, look up the Charlie Gard case, RIP to that sweet little child, the victim of socialized medicine. |
|
|
|
Oh ok. I agree that democrats think we have a money tree. They think they can add an endless amount of people onto our welfare system without it collapsing. They remind me of a crazy cat lady who thinks she can take in every stray. Then one day her house gets condemned.
|
|
|
|
Oh ok. I agree that democrats think we have a money tree. They think they can add an endless amount of people onto our welfare system without it collapsing. They remind me of a crazy cat lady who thinks she can take in every stray. Then one day her house gets condemned. exactly |
|
|
|
When the story first aired it was Medicaid for all, then changed to Medicare. I pretty sure you have to be 65 to recieve Medicare. I think they are trying to clean up her promises a bit. Hopefully their are enough working people in that distric that a Republican is elected. Doesn't look hopeful for that area. no she said medicare, Medicare in the states is 65 and older, Medicare she is talking about is what goes in my country in Canada, we have Medicare which means Single payer system funded by the government for all citizens (except illegals) Its called Medicare here, same as in the UK.Australia,Taiwan. what ms.orcasio-cortez doesnt get it is, when you have medicare for all people citizens and undocumented you get the basics yes but its at a cost, for instance in the UK, look at the Charlie Gard case, the poor child that died because the British healthcare system refused to treat him because it was too expensive to treat his rare disease. And if you're old or too obese, good luck , ask any of our British posters what their hospitals are like compared to the American hospitals. I suggest Ms. Orcasio-Cortez take a trip to the UK and visit a hospital and see for herself. For the leftist and Democrats who wants a single payer health system, look up the Charlie Gard case, RIP to that sweet little child, the victim of socialized medicine. I 'visited' the UK several times. I married a brit. He was very happy with their healthcare and I never have known him to not be able to afford healthcare or be indebted because of it. |
|
|
|
I 'visited' the UK several times. I married a brit. He was very happy with their healthcare and I never have known him to not be able to afford healthcare or be indebted because of it. and you were the one telling us that visiting a place is not the same as living there right? Did you use the British healthcare system when you were there? |
|
|
|
I 'visited' the UK several times. I married a brit. He was very happy with their healthcare and I never have known him to not be able to afford healthcare or be indebted because of it. and you were the one telling us that visiting a place is not the same as living there right? Did you use the British healthcare system when you were there? I could not use it, not being a brit and all. And yes, I am using the 'whats good for the goose' foundation of visiting being grounds for sufficient knowledge of a place. |
|
|