Got to say, I agree with Trump.

The man is right often times!

It was a bad deal from day one and I trust the Iranians as far as I can throw...so I don't have a problem with pulling out.

Trump did the smart thing again. In 90 days "when the new sanctions that will ultimately be put on Iran " the mullahs will comply to any new deal that is worked out through negotiations . And that region of the world will be much safer. It's funny how when a bad deal or idea is confronted from a position of strength , what can be accomplished. That's one differance between Obama and Trump . Obamas presidential term was guided by popularity. Trumps presidency so far has been guided by making life more prosperous and secure for Americans and our allies.

I wonder if there's any chance we can get our planeload of cash back?

what the Iran needing badly is the reactor power engine but not the nuclear weapon.....but you have the reactor it means you do can make the A-Bomb. complicating topic.....and complicating fact. only the time will answer......

Pity you couldn't have nuclear power without the by products!

Cool~~~~~~

Trumpzilla!!!
Best President since awesome Ronald Reagan .

Definitely Trump/Pence 2020

MAGA one liberal teardrop at a time.

Iran is one of the most biggest threats to America and obviously Israel .
They need to be kept in check.

This comes under the heading of "time will tell."

I wish Trump was operating from strategy, rather than bluster and political opportunism.

I didn't care for the original deal either, but it did take us forward. If you refuse to recognize that, you're ignoring factual reality, in favor of prejudice-based anti-ism. Because of the original deal, there have been real international monitors, in Iran, checking, and so far making sure that they were not pushing a nuclear weapons program forward.

Will Trump's rather impetuous, and as yet unexplained decision to bail out of the agreement (without any proof that Iran broke it) lead to Iran being MORE willing to make a more realistic deal, or less?

Only time will tell. Sometimes, a leader of a major nation who appears to be capricious and unpredictable, will accidentally (or purposely) cause opponents to behave more cautiously, and longer peace will result. Sometimes it causes the opposite.

It feels like Bush all over, impulsiveness and no plan. I understood Bush motive for WANTING to go in at least, although it was not very leaderlike(imho) to do so with no exit strategy.

similarly, unless information came in that the deal was causing actual harm instead of causing help, and if it was helping even slightly(and reading up on it, it seems it was) I dont understand why we pull out of it without a really good reason and something better to replace it ...


unfortunately partisan politicians seem to work too often from a base of 'your plan is not good enough or fast enough so lets go back to the drawing board COMPLETELY until I come up with something better'

but as you so logically stated Igor, Time will tell.

Only thing time is , and or states , is time.
No "tells".

Apparently you aren't familiar with the idiomatic expression. I suggest you look it up.

I am familiar with it, just don't care for it.
Kinda like "sticks N stones"...

I agree with Trump this time

lord knows if it was HiLIARy in charge she would have found a way for Bill and the foundation to profit from it .


Obama made a mistake with Iran, and I hope Trump is smart enough to fix it.