I may not be American but I have looked at the candidates for your elections. Were I American and able to vote it would be for Mitt Romney (R). He makes sense on all fronts to me. Even though he's Republican and Bush is as well.


Who would you vote for and why?

I know niether one of these canidates will make it, but I wouldn't mind seeing hillary Clinton(D) or Obama(D). I chose these 2 because I believe they can do the best job and they are not republicans.

To hell with voting. I'm moving to Canada to escape. =)

THe sad thing is that I am still weighing the candidates out. I think that they all have aspects or issues that they support and I disagree with. I am leaning towards Mitt Romney though right now. I am still looking at Guiliani as well.

Unfortunately we have a elections here as well. There is no escape.

John Edwards, his message is loud and clear, not just words but bona-fide plans, drawn up in detail to take America back from Corporate interests and give it back to the people!

I trust what he says!

He didn't make it through the primary's last year. what makes you think he can do it this year.

I think the candidate that scares me the most is Clinton.....and that says a lot.

Drivinmenutz

It says more about you than it does about her!! Having lived in Arkansas during Clintons governorship, and getting to know both Bill and Hillary, you need to look past her sex, and start looking at her qualifications.

Clinton doesn't answer questions clearly, she's skiddish at best. It seems she's afraid of pissing off the wrong people. I'm all for a first lady but she just doesn't have the backbone required. Obama is great but unfortunately most people won't vote for a black president for fear of change and general ignorance. Guiliani is a crook, through and through and it's undeniable so don't even try a rebuttal, I won't care or respond. Ron Paul is the only Republican worth a damn in the last 20 years, or ever. He calls out Bush straight up and doesn't care about what it does for his reputation so he'll never get voted for of course. Not that it matters who we vote for nowadays but I would say Edwards or Kucinich would do the best, they are both clear on their issues and obviously want to change things for the better. On top of that, they have no problem telling people how they feel as opposed to just telling the masses what they want to hear, which is what this country needs, a wake up call. How much longer will the presidential debate be a ****ing MTV reality show? It's all theatrics, drama, misdirection, and frankly, bad acting.

This is my big problem here with Clinton, she is way too much of a politician. I agree, she has the knowlage and experience to do things right. I disagree with a lot of her ideas and it seems she changes her points of view every day. This has nothing to do with her gender...trust me my older sister beat that out of me at a very young age. This is more about politicians having greater concerned with votes than treating any real issues at hand. To be honest i'm probably not going to be impressed with any candidate right now. I also think anyone who picks any candidate based on his or her political party is retarded. It's called blind party politics and is a big waste of time and energy.

i'm still waiting for Lou Dobbs to run and i ain't voting again til he does!

I agree with Fanta .

John Edwards seems like the best of an unusually bad lot.

I like Lou Dobbs too, hes got my vote. the ONLY thing i disagree with him on is his war in Iraq beliefs. Other than that he is great.