According to testimony before Congress AND during Comey's press conference He specifically said there were "classified documents at the time"

Sorry M.S. you should watch these hearings and pressers more carefully

thats ok,, I watch those of interest


this didnt qualify



more partisan nitpicking, imho

from politifact:

Even though just two emails out of many thousands were marked classified at the time they were sent, it’s more than the number Clinton cited: zero.

In total, the investigation found 110 emails in 52 email chains containing information that was classified at the time it was sent or received. Eight chains contained top secret information, the highest level of classification, 36 chains contained secret information, and the remaining eight contained confidential information. Most of these emails, however, did not contain markings clearly delineating their status.


MARKED classified 2 emails,, 2 emails out of thousands,,,,

The head of the State Dept mishandling Classified documents and lying about it doesn't qualify as an interest?

I guess that answers a whole lot of questions

yes, , EMAILS , I Have much experience with them,, clicking through them is very easy to do


and , as stated above, and as I thought,, 2 out of thousands hardly interests me,,, unless they said those 2 were a list of undercover operatives and their locations,,lol

There were a lot more then 2! Some of these were SAP (special Access Program) higher then "top secret".

did you take part in the investigation?

who is your source?


being classified, and being MARKED classified at the time is whats in question

and 2 were MARKED,,,

SAP and Top Secret are not Marked CLASSIFIED. People who have access to these programs KNOW they are classified just by their nature.

Very few in government, even Congressmen, can't see these emails yet they were kept on a server that didn't even have the protection level as Gmail according to Director Comey.

Bull....Mother....Fricking ......$hit!

_______________

From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.

For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.
_______________

That is DIRECTLY from James Comeys report.....your spin is nothing but absolute agenda bull $hit.


And that is not from some fricked up left wing Politico hack website. Thats in the FBI directors own words.
http://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

Spin the Frick away...its all you do

contain classified

and be MARKED classified,, are different things

no, they're not...

Weak as $hit agenda driven spin....about what I expected. Carry on in your Hillary cuck fairy tale land.

Soooooo disingenuous.

Click your heels three times.....maybe you'll return home from that fantasy world you're currently in.
I gave you DIRECT quotes from THE FBI Director and you call it a conspiracy. Bye, I don't debate with trolls.....maybe some third grade dumb azz here will buy your bull$hit....good luck with that.

LMAO


sorry not to buy into the 'disingenous' email conspiracy instead

there is no debate

there are three different issues

being classified
being classified at the time
and being MARKED classified at the time


the conspiracy trying to imply some intentional dishonesty or misconduct is what I dont grasp on to like the hilary haters do...

your backpeddling now... first is was "contains" classifed vs "marked" classifed, now you put a time stamp on it? if it says "classied" anywhere in the document, then it's classifed... not real hard to figure out...

Just looked at the start of this thread and saw:



Why is this statement included in a comment about HRC?

I don't know if its true that women find self promotion more difficult than men do - if it is true, its probably one of the many reasons that women (in general) choose to make less than men do (in general).

But HRC clearly has no trouble promoting herself. The problem is, the modern internet era makes it so much harder to hide the facts and to control the message.

it is included in relation to the point of how unpopular it is for women to seek power,, EVEN amongst women

HRC is shown to be more popular in office than when seeking office

no,I didnt say there were 2 emails
the state department representative,, Kirby, announced there were 2
look it up



https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/statement-by-fbi-director-james-b-comey-on-the-investigation-of-secretary-hillary-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system


the FBI press release announced that out of those she didnt release when she initially ran( what hates call deleted or imply were hidden)

there were 3 emails

"With respect to the thousands of e-mails we found that were not among those produced to State, agencies have concluded that three of those were classified at the time they were sent or received, one at the Secret level and two at the Confidential level."




I have researched, like I normally do, what I have posted

______________
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.
_____________ ______
cuckitty cuck cuck cuckitty cuck cuck...She's lying all the wayyyyyyyy.

Lied about emails continually
Lied about servers continually
Lied about Bosnian sniper fire
Lied about being broke when she left the White House
Lied TO THE FACE of Benghazi victims parents
Lies so much,she wouldn't know the truth if it bit her in her ample azz
Lies lies lies lies lies.
Some peoples arms should be damned tired from carry Hillarys buckets of water around.


If you hear a siren, its a warning for the incoming spin....EF-5 type spin