100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: President Andrew Jackson, Replaced By Harriett Truman | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE 
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Take off all the faces and put the phucking number there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and give in to all the 'whiny' folks?
never,,,!!!! lol |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Sat 04/23/16 11:44 AM
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? You are confusing racism and bigot for SOP imperialistic business that is to this day accepted by british and the common law we inherited from them. Nothing to do with bigot or racist. Following the british tradition of immoral opportunist for commercial gain, ok I will buy into that in part. (which is why we are all slaves to the national debt we had no part in making!) Not bigot and not racist unless you have demonstrable evidence. Fact not yours or someone elses naked opinion or rhetoric. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? no, he's saying you're the racist bigot because you can't see anything besides your own color... more than just blacks were slaves, but yet all you do is degrade whites as racist bigots because they used black slaves... your comprehension skills are lacking... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 04/23/16 11:43 AM
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? You are confusing SOP for imperialistic business that is to this day accepted by british and the common law we inherited from them. Nothing to do with bigot or racist. Following the british tradition of immoral opportunist for commercial gain, ok I will buy into that in part. Not bigot and not racist unlress you have demonstratable evidence. Fact not yours or someone elses naked opinion or rhetoric. is this still some refutation of how funny it is to replace a bigot with a freedom fighter? hard to have evidence of an adjective like racist, because people all have such subjective standards as to what qualifies just like its hard to prove that someone brought down a system or reigned in something new,,,etc,,etc,,etc,, fortunately, I only have to post an opinion like everyone else so ,, unless the circular argument over someones opinion is of particular interest,,,,,sure seems this is getting more and more pointless |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are confusing racism and bigot for SOP imperialistic business that is to this day accepted by british and the common law we inherited from them. Nothing to do with bigot or racist. Following the british tradition of immoral opportunist for commercial gain, ok I will buy into that in part. (which is why we are all slaves to the national debt we had no part in making!) Not bigot and not racist unless you have demonstrable evidence. Fact not yours or someone elses naked opinion or rhetoric. is this still some refutation of how funny it is to replace a bigot with a freedom fighter? hard to have evidence of an adjective like racist, because people all have such subjective standards as to what qualifies just like its hard to prove that someone brought down a system or reigned in something new,,,etc,,etc,,etc,, fortunately, I only have to post an opinion like everyone else so ,, unless the circular argument over someones opinion is of particular interest,,,,,sure seems this is getting more and more pointless Ok then forgive me if I do not take your unqualified opinion seriously. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? no, he's saying you're the racist bigot because you can't see anything besides your own color... more than just blacks were slaves, but yet all you do is degrade whites as racist bigots because they used black slaves... your comprehension skills are lacking... I DONT CARE what has that to do with the FACT of the sacrifice harriet tubman made I'm not comparing her to weezy Jefferson, , so save the racist angle for some of the other minglers I simply stated that it was funny for a freedomfighter, to be replacing a bigot |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are confusing racism and bigot for SOP imperialistic business that is to this day accepted by british and the common law we inherited from them. Nothing to do with bigot or racist. Following the british tradition of immoral opportunist for commercial gain, ok I will buy into that in part. (which is why we are all slaves to the national debt we had no part in making!) Not bigot and not racist unless you have demonstrable evidence. Fact not yours or someone elses naked opinion or rhetoric. is this still some refutation of how funny it is to replace a bigot with a freedom fighter? hard to have evidence of an adjective like racist, because people all have such subjective standards as to what qualifies just like its hard to prove that someone brought down a system or reigned in something new,,,etc,,etc,,etc,, fortunately, I only have to post an opinion like everyone else so ,, unless the circular argument over someones opinion is of particular interest,,,,,sure seems this is getting more and more pointless Ok then forgive me if I do not take your unqualified opinion seriously. no need to forgive someone with just as 'unqualified' an opinion as anyone elses,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Sat 04/23/16 12:03 PM
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? no, he's saying you're the racist bigot because you can't see anything besides your own color... more than just blacks were slaves, but yet all you do is degrade whites as racist bigots because they used black slaves... your comprehension skills are lacking... I DONT CARE what has that to do with the FACT of the sacrifice harriet tubman made I'm not comparing her to weezy Jefferson, , so save the racist angle for some of the other minglers I simply stated that it was funny for a freedomfighter, to be replacing a bigot and of course fighting the british in the revolutionary war was obviously no sacrifice IYO? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
LittleLeftofRight
on
Sat 04/23/16 12:05 PM
|
|
You are confusing racism and bigot for SOP imperialistic business that is to this day accepted by british and the common law we inherited from them. Nothing to do with bigot or racist. Following the british tradition of immoral opportunist for commercial gain, ok I will buy into that in part. (which is why we are all slaves to the national debt we had no part in making!) Not bigot and not racist unless you have demonstrable evidence. Fact not yours or someone elses naked opinion or rhetoric. is this still some refutation of how funny it is to replace a bigot with a freedom fighter? hard to have evidence of an adjective like racist, because people all have such subjective standards as to what qualifies just like its hard to prove that someone brought down a system or reigned in something new,,,etc,,etc,,etc,, fortunately, I only have to post an opinion like everyone else so ,, unless the circular argument over someones opinion is of particular interest,,,,,sure seems this is getting more and more pointless Ok then forgive me if I do not take your unqualified opinion seriously. no need to forgive someone with just as 'unqualified' an opinion as anyone elses,,, You dont understand, 'unqualified' means you have nothing more than hot air and moving lips to back up your claims. screw this I have better things do. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
ErotiDoug
on
Sat 04/23/16 12:14 PM
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? no, he's saying you're the racist bigot because you can't see anything besides your own color... more than just blacks were slaves, but yet all you do is degrade whites as racist bigots because they used black slaves... your comprehension skills are lacking... I DONT CARE what has that to do with the FACT of the sacrifice harriet tubman made I'm not comparing her to weezy Jefferson, , so save the racist angle for some of the other minglers I simply stated that it was funny for a freedomfighter, to be replacing a bigot and of course fighting the british in the revolutionary war was obviously no sacrifice IYO? * Jefferson quote : " screw this I have better things do. " 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? no, he's saying you're the racist bigot because you can't see anything besides your own color... more than just blacks were slaves, but yet all you do is degrade whites as racist bigots because they used black slaves... your comprehension skills are lacking... I DONT CARE what has that to do with the FACT of the sacrifice harriet tubman made I'm not comparing her to weezy Jefferson, , so save the racist angle for some of the other minglers I simply stated that it was funny for a freedomfighter, to be replacing a bigot i don't care who replaces who... you using the term "bigot" is just racist and insensitive, and promoting your BLM agenda... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? no, he's saying you're the racist bigot because you can't see anything besides your own color... more than just blacks were slaves, but yet all you do is degrade whites as racist bigots because they used black slaves... your comprehension skills are lacking... I DONT CARE what has that to do with the FACT of the sacrifice harriet tubman made I'm not comparing her to weezy Jefferson, , so save the racist angle for some of the other minglers I simply stated that it was funny for a freedomfighter, to be replacing a bigot and of course fighting the british in the revolutionary war was obviously no sacrifice IYO? of course but for me the sacrifice that comes with pay and that which comes with only risk are not in the same ball park |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You are confusing racism and bigot for SOP imperialistic business that is to this day accepted by british and the common law we inherited from them. Nothing to do with bigot or racist. Following the british tradition of immoral opportunist for commercial gain, ok I will buy into that in part. (which is why we are all slaves to the national debt we had no part in making!) Not bigot and not racist unless you have demonstrable evidence. Fact not yours or someone elses naked opinion or rhetoric. is this still some refutation of how funny it is to replace a bigot with a freedom fighter? hard to have evidence of an adjective like racist, because people all have such subjective standards as to what qualifies just like its hard to prove that someone brought down a system or reigned in something new,,,etc,,etc,,etc,, fortunately, I only have to post an opinion like everyone else so ,, unless the circular argument over someones opinion is of particular interest,,,,,sure seems this is getting more and more pointless Ok then forgive me if I do not take your unqualified opinion seriously. no need to forgive someone with just as 'unqualified' an opinion as anyone elses,,, You dont understand, 'unqualified' means you have nothing more than hot air and moving lips to back up your claims. screw this I have better things do. in this thread 'unqualified' means that ones sources are either 'hot air' or credible,,,depending upon which opinion the narrative backs up but all the same,, none the less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? no, he's saying you're the racist bigot because you can't see anything besides your own color... more than just blacks were slaves, but yet all you do is degrade whites as racist bigots because they used black slaves... your comprehension skills are lacking... I DONT CARE what has that to do with the FACT of the sacrifice harriet tubman made I'm not comparing her to weezy Jefferson, , so save the racist angle for some of the other minglers I simply stated that it was funny for a freedomfighter, to be replacing a bigot i don't care who replaces who... you using the term "bigot" is just racist and insensitive, and promoting your BLM agenda...
oh,,,,so sorry he could have been one of those loving slaveowners, instead I will rephrase, how funny it is that they replace a slaveowner with a freedom fighter ...all better? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
its a nice tangent to educate us on one decade of the irish in Montserrat ,,,,lol still doesn't change an iota of the facts I posted only one could be chosen and only one was replaced that chosen one was freedomfighter and that replaced one was a bigot\ not to mention replacing a male from a historically patriarchal form of governing with a FEMALE
Appeal to fiction Logic and rhetoric Key articles Logical fallacy Syllogism Argument General logic A posteriori Hoyle's fallacy Logic Bad logic Affirming the consequent Argumentum ad fastidium Deepity Gambler's fallacy Just asking questions An appeal to fiction (also generalizing from fictional evidence) is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone makes claims about reality based on evidence drawn from works of fiction. Explanation Fiction is not reality — it is driven in large part by considerations of being interesting to the audience rather than reflecting reality with 100% accuracy. Furthermore, fiction shows systemic bias in its distortion of reality; common deviations for the audience's benefit are catalogued and studied as tropes. Using fiction to argue about reality can therefore systematically skewer your beliefs and expectations. You went from racist to bigot even after being shown blacks were not the only ones to be enslaved in America, whats next? That and I have already shown that we are all slaves as a result of the national debt. It appears you need to brush up on the difference between political rhetoric facts so is your argument no one should be chosen for anything because everyone has gone through something? smh sorry to disappoint you,, but we have faces on our bills, they are chosen , only one to a bill and on this bill a historical bigot will be replaced with a historical freedom fighter what does all this extra information have to do with it exactly? no, he's saying you're the racist bigot because you can't see anything besides your own color... more than just blacks were slaves, but yet all you do is degrade whites as racist bigots because they used black slaves... your comprehension skills are lacking... I DONT CARE what has that to do with the FACT of the sacrifice harriet tubman made I'm not comparing her to weezy Jefferson, , so save the racist angle for some of the other minglers I simply stated that it was funny for a freedomfighter, to be replacing a bigot i don't care who replaces who... you using the term "bigot" is just racist and insensitive, and promoting your BLM agenda...
oh,,,,so sorry he could have been one of those loving slaveowners, instead I will rephrase, how funny it is that they replace a slaveowner with a freedom fighter ...all better? yes, thank you... at least that is truthful... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess no one checked the books (again), to see what happens when a society tries to erase history. Arrivederci 
nope.....unless history is somekind of fiction.....no history was been make but causes..... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess no one checked the books (again), to see what happens when a society tries to erase history. Arrivederci
nope.....unless history is somekind of fiction.....no history was been make but causes.....  I knew someone would get it.
When can you move to America? We may need people who know history repeats itself
|
|
|
|
|
