100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Donald Trump fails to condemn the KKK | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I'm voting Trump... Just saying...   I love reading these political threads, Thanks you guys~and ladies   Ditto, i like reading these posts it confirms how truly Americans live in the matrix, no wonder it will become 2nd rate soon with a bunch of clueless lives, perhaps some will come out of the coma state ??? Maybe a revival may come into play 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Donald Trump over the weekend appeared to flip-flop on the endorsement of David Duke, the former grand wizard of the Ku Kluz Klan.
Duke endorsed the U.S. Republican presidential contender on Thursday saying that "voting against Donald Trump at this point is really treason to your heritage," reported the Guardian. In an interview with CNN on Sunday, Trump at first didn't disavow the endorsement, appearing as though he didn't know who Duke was. "Just so you understand, I don't know anything about David Duke, OK?" Trump said on CNN's State of the Union. "Certainly I would disavow it if I thought there was something wrong." The reporter posed the question on whether Trump would disavow the Klansman three times with little success in getting Trump to clarify his opinion. "I don't know anything about what you're even talking about with white supremacy or white supremacists," he said. Not long after the interview, Trump's Twitter account tweeted that he already disavowed Duke at a rally on Friday. He did not, however, disavow all support by the KKK, which had been one of the focal points of the CNN interview. Trump's previous run-ins with David Duke included when he ran for the Reform Party presidential nomination in 2000. When Trump ended his campaign, he pointed to Duke as one of his key reasons for deciding to leave the race. "The Reform Party now includes a Klansman, Mr. Duke, a neo-Nazi, Mr. [Patrick] Buchanan, and a communist, Ms. [Lenora] Fulani. This is not company I wish to keep," he wrote in a statement to the New York Times. Donald Trump downplays endorsement from David Duke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it's all over CNN, YouTube and all media. Was willing to overlook alot of things to make a change in Washington DC. Now Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK). They were supporting each other when running for president under the Republican reform ticket. When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? Clinton News Network, who cares! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it's all over CNN, YouTube and all media. Was willing to overlook alot of things to make a change in Washington DC. Now Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK). They were supporting each other when running for president under the Republican reform ticket. When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? Clinton News Network, who cares! I hate CNN... Damn Dems ! One thing is for sure, they must be scared sh@tless Be afraid, be very afraid!: http://youtu.be/--hMJPUBwMc/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK) Without looking him up on Wikipedia all I know about the guy is at some point he had something to do with the KKK. Is that enough to condemn him and tell him his vote isn't wanted, completely unprovoked? Just go on air and say "hey! You! David Duke guy! Yeah, we've never spoken but I don't want your vote! The anti defamation league is telling me you're racist and to condemn you...so I'm doing it on t.v." When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? I think based on the interview where this came from that Donald Trump did the best he could have. It was basically: "Gotcha!" "I'm not going to play that game." The "interview" was: "the anti defamation league has asked you to publicly condemn unequivocally the racism of former kkk grand wizard david duke who recently said 'voting against you is treason to your heritage'...will you unequivocally condemn david duke and say you don't want his vote or other white supremacists in this election?" "Just so you know I don't know anything about david duke or what you're talking about with white supremacy or supremacists did he endorse me or what's going on because I know nothing about david duke I know nothing about white supremacists and so you're asking me a question about people I know nothing about...." "The question from the anti defamation league is even if you don't know about their endorsements there are these groups and individuals endorsing you would you just say unequivocally you condemn them and you don't want their support?" "Well I'd have to look at the group. I don't know what group you're talking about. Who would want me to condemn a group I know nothing about? If you would send me a list of the groups I would do some research on them and certainly I would disavow if I thought there was something wrong but you may have groups in there that may be fine and it would be very unfair, so send me a list of the groups and I'll let you know." "I'm just talking about david duke and the kkk." "Honestly I don't know david duke, I don't believe I've ever met him, I'm pretty sure I've never met him, I just don't know anything about him." Remember how much crap Obama got for beergate and treyvon martin for offering his opinion and sticking his nose where it really shouldn't have been, based on a lack of, or biased, information? How about bush invading iraq? You would be okay if Trump knee jerk reacted to "they're racists! You condemn them, right? You gotta do something about this right now! Don't think, you don't need information, just condemn, condemn, invade, err, condemn, I used the magic 'they're racists' words." except, this is Trump so him disavowing or telling people he doesn't want their vote is pretty much par for the course not allowing muslims in? considering a muslim registry? stating a 'preference' for veterans that weren't captured? but condemning racists is something that would be ,,,,what? risky? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK) Without looking him up on Wikipedia all I know about the guy is at some point he had something to do with the KKK. Is that enough to condemn him and tell him his vote isn't wanted, completely unprovoked? Just go on air and say "hey! You! David Duke guy! Yeah, we've never spoken but I don't want your vote! The anti defamation league is telling me you're racist and to condemn you...so I'm doing it on t.v." When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? I think based on the interview where this came from that Donald Trump did the best he could have. It was basically: "Gotcha!" "I'm not going to play that game." The "interview" was: "the anti defamation league has asked you to publicly condemn unequivocally the racism of former kkk grand wizard david duke who recently said 'voting against you is treason to your heritage'...will you unequivocally condemn david duke and say you don't want his vote or other white supremacists in this election?" "Just so you know I don't know anything about david duke or what you're talking about with white supremacy or supremacists did he endorse me or what's going on because I know nothing about david duke I know nothing about white supremacists and so you're asking me a question about people I know nothing about...." "The question from the anti defamation league is even if you don't know about their endorsements there are these groups and individuals endorsing you would you just say unequivocally you condemn them and you don't want their support?" "Well I'd have to look at the group. I don't know what group you're talking about. Who would want me to condemn a group I know nothing about? If you would send me a list of the groups I would do some research on them and certainly I would disavow if I thought there was something wrong but you may have groups in there that may be fine and it would be very unfair, so send me a list of the groups and I'll let you know." "I'm just talking about david duke and the kkk." "Honestly I don't know david duke, I don't believe I've ever met him, I'm pretty sure I've never met him, I just don't know anything about him." Remember how much crap Obama got for beergate and treyvon martin for offering his opinion and sticking his nose where it really shouldn't have been, based on a lack of, or biased, information? How about bush invading iraq? You would be okay if Trump knee jerk reacted to "they're racists! You condemn them, right? You gotta do something about this right now! Don't think, you don't need information, just condemn, condemn, invade, err, condemn, I used the magic 'they're racists' words." except, this is Trump so him disavowing or telling people he doesn't want their vote is pretty much par for the course not allowing muslims in? considering a muslim registry? stating a 'preference' for veterans that weren't captured? but condemning racists is something that would be ,,,,what? risky? i'm missing what the problem is about the muslims... why shouldn't they be singled out when they are the ones acting up? i'm also missing your point about the veterans... Obarry has pretty much dismissed them all, DT wants them to have something to show for serving their country... why would that be a problem for you? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK) Without looking him up on Wikipedia all I know about the guy is at some point he had something to do with the KKK. Is that enough to condemn him and tell him his vote isn't wanted, completely unprovoked? Just go on air and say "hey! You! David Duke guy! Yeah, we've never spoken but I don't want your vote! The anti defamation league is telling me you're racist and to condemn you...so I'm doing it on t.v." When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? I think based on the interview where this came from that Donald Trump did the best he could have. It was basically: "Gotcha!" "I'm not going to play that game." The "interview" was: "the anti defamation league has asked you to publicly condemn unequivocally the racism of former kkk grand wizard david duke who recently said 'voting against you is treason to your heritage'...will you unequivocally condemn david duke and say you don't want his vote or other white supremacists in this election?" "Just so you know I don't know anything about david duke or what you're talking about with white supremacy or supremacists did he endorse me or what's going on because I know nothing about david duke I know nothing about white supremacists and so you're asking me a question about people I know nothing about...." "The question from the anti defamation league is even if you don't know about their endorsements there are these groups and individuals endorsing you would you just say unequivocally you condemn them and you don't want their support?" "Well I'd have to look at the group. I don't know what group you're talking about. Who would want me to condemn a group I know nothing about? If you would send me a list of the groups I would do some research on them and certainly I would disavow if I thought there was something wrong but you may have groups in there that may be fine and it would be very unfair, so send me a list of the groups and I'll let you know." "I'm just talking about david duke and the kkk." "Honestly I don't know david duke, I don't believe I've ever met him, I'm pretty sure I've never met him, I just don't know anything about him." Remember how much crap Obama got for beergate and treyvon martin for offering his opinion and sticking his nose where it really shouldn't have been, based on a lack of, or biased, information? How about bush invading iraq? You would be okay if Trump knee jerk reacted to "they're racists! You condemn them, right? You gotta do something about this right now! Don't think, you don't need information, just condemn, condemn, invade, err, condemn, I used the magic 'they're racists' words." except, this is Trump so him disavowing or telling people he doesn't want their vote is pretty much par for the course not allowing muslims in? considering a muslim registry? stating a 'preference' for veterans that weren't captured? but condemning racists is something that would be ,,,,what? risky? i'm missing what the problem is about the muslims... why shouldn't they be singled out when they are the ones acting up? i'm also missing your point about the veterans... Obarry has pretty much dismissed them all, DT wants them to have something to show for serving their country... why would that be a problem for you? this is not about me or whats a problem for me its a thread about why Trump did not respond in the negative about Duke or the KKK the argument was made that it would be unreasonable for him to publically tell people that he basically doesn't want their vote the COUNTER to that argument is that TRUMPS past behavior negates considering whats reasonable or not,, and especially any concern for what 'votes' he gets since he insults so many groups so regularly and has declared his realization that his followers don't give a crap who he offends , murdering someone would not cost him one vote' so why think he believes disavowing the KKK would? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK) Without looking him up on Wikipedia all I know about the guy is at some point he had something to do with the KKK. Is that enough to condemn him and tell him his vote isn't wanted, completely unprovoked? Just go on air and say "hey! You! David Duke guy! Yeah, we've never spoken but I don't want your vote! The anti defamation league is telling me you're racist and to condemn you...so I'm doing it on t.v." When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? I think based on the interview where this came from that Donald Trump did the best he could have. It was basically: "Gotcha!" "I'm not going to play that game." The "interview" was: "the anti defamation league has asked you to publicly condemn unequivocally the racism of former kkk grand wizard david duke who recently said 'voting against you is treason to your heritage'...will you unequivocally condemn david duke and say you don't want his vote or other white supremacists in this election?" "Just so you know I don't know anything about david duke or what you're talking about with white supremacy or supremacists did he endorse me or what's going on because I know nothing about david duke I know nothing about white supremacists and so you're asking me a question about people I know nothing about...." "The question from the anti defamation league is even if you don't know about their endorsements there are these groups and individuals endorsing you would you just say unequivocally you condemn them and you don't want their support?" "Well I'd have to look at the group. I don't know what group you're talking about. Who would want me to condemn a group I know nothing about? If you would send me a list of the groups I would do some research on them and certainly I would disavow if I thought there was something wrong but you may have groups in there that may be fine and it would be very unfair, so send me a list of the groups and I'll let you know." "I'm just talking about david duke and the kkk." "Honestly I don't know david duke, I don't believe I've ever met him, I'm pretty sure I've never met him, I just don't know anything about him." Remember how much crap Obama got for beergate and treyvon martin for offering his opinion and sticking his nose where it really shouldn't have been, based on a lack of, or biased, information? How about bush invading iraq? You would be okay if Trump knee jerk reacted to "they're racists! You condemn them, right? You gotta do something about this right now! Don't think, you don't need information, just condemn, condemn, invade, err, condemn, I used the magic 'they're racists' words." except, this is Trump so him disavowing or telling people he doesn't want their vote is pretty much par for the course not allowing muslims in? considering a muslim registry? stating a 'preference' for veterans that weren't captured? but condemning racists is something that would be ,,,,what? risky? i'm missing what the problem is about the muslims... why shouldn't they be singled out when they are the ones acting up? i'm also missing your point about the veterans... Obarry has pretty much dismissed them all, DT wants them to have something to show for serving their country... why would that be a problem for you? this is not about me or whats a problem for me its a thread about why Trump did not respond in the negative about Duke or the KKK the argument was made that it would be unreasonable for him to publically tell people that he basically doesn't want their vote the COUNTER to that argument is that TRUMPS past behavior negates considering whats reasonable or not,, and especially any concern for what 'votes' he gets since he insults so many groups so regularly and has declared his realization that his followers don't give a crap who he offends , murdering someone would not cost him one vote' so why think he believes disavowing the KKK would? who cares? why don't you go ask him about the black panthers? or what he thinks about pink tutu's? you and your liberal friends are just trying to trap him on his answers to stupid questions... Duke said he supports trump, trump never said anything about Duke, did he? the liberals aren't really smart enough to make an effective smear campaign... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if Trump's told his lawyers to start compiling a list of who to sue for libel and/or slander after he changes laws unilaterally to protect him from the documented statements he has denied he made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Berzelius "Buzzy" Windrip!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder if Trump's told his lawyers to start compiling a list of who to sue for libel and/or slander after he changes laws unilaterally to protect him from the documented statements he has denied he made.  I said the same thing! * There is so much evidence* Great minds think alike.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK) Without looking him up on Wikipedia all I know about the guy is at some point he had something to do with the KKK. Is that enough to condemn him and tell him his vote isn't wanted, completely unprovoked? Just go on air and say "hey! You! David Duke guy! Yeah, we've never spoken but I don't want your vote! The anti defamation league is telling me you're racist and to condemn you...so I'm doing it on t.v." When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? I think based on the interview where this came from that Donald Trump did the best he could have. It was basically: "Gotcha!" "I'm not going to play that game." The "interview" was: "the anti defamation league has asked you to publicly condemn unequivocally the racism of former kkk grand wizard david duke who recently said 'voting against you is treason to your heritage'...will you unequivocally condemn david duke and say you don't want his vote or other white supremacists in this election?" "Just so you know I don't know anything about david duke or what you're talking about with white supremacy or supremacists did he endorse me or what's going on because I know nothing about david duke I know nothing about white supremacists and so you're asking me a question about people I know nothing about...." "The question from the anti defamation league is even if you don't know about their endorsements there are these groups and individuals endorsing you would you just say unequivocally you condemn them and you don't want their support?" "Well I'd have to look at the group. I don't know what group you're talking about. Who would want me to condemn a group I know nothing about? If you would send me a list of the groups I would do some research on them and certainly I would disavow if I thought there was something wrong but you may have groups in there that may be fine and it would be very unfair, so send me a list of the groups and I'll let you know." "I'm just talking about david duke and the kkk." "Honestly I don't know david duke, I don't believe I've ever met him, I'm pretty sure I've never met him, I just don't know anything about him." Remember how much crap Obama got for beergate and treyvon martin for offering his opinion and sticking his nose where it really shouldn't have been, based on a lack of, or biased, information? How about bush invading iraq? You would be okay if Trump knee jerk reacted to "they're racists! You condemn them, right? You gotta do something about this right now! Don't think, you don't need information, just condemn, condemn, invade, err, condemn, I used the magic 'they're racists' words." except, this is Trump so him disavowing or telling people he doesn't want their vote is pretty much par for the course not allowing muslims in? considering a muslim registry? stating a 'preference' for veterans that weren't captured? but condemning racists is something that would be ,,,,what? risky? i'm missing what the problem is about the muslims... why shouldn't they be singled out when they are the ones acting up? i'm also missing your point about the veterans... Obarry has pretty much dismissed them all, DT wants them to have something to show for serving their country... why would that be a problem for you? this is not about me or whats a problem for me its a thread about why Trump did not respond in the negative about Duke or the KKK the argument was made that it would be unreasonable for him to publically tell people that he basically doesn't want their vote the COUNTER to that argument is that TRUMPS past behavior negates considering whats reasonable or not,, and especially any concern for what 'votes' he gets since he insults so many groups so regularly and has declared his realization that his followers don't give a crap who he offends , murdering someone would not cost him one vote' so why think he believes disavowing the KKK would? who cares? why don't you go ask him about the black panthers? or what he thinks about pink tutu's? you and your liberal friends are just trying to trap him on his answers to stupid questions... Duke said he supports trump, trump never said anything about Duke, did he? the liberals aren't really smart enough to make an effective smear campaign... you asked a question and it was answered, whether you care or not is your business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK) Without looking him up on Wikipedia all I know about the guy is at some point he had something to do with the KKK. Is that enough to condemn him and tell him his vote isn't wanted, completely unprovoked? Just go on air and say "hey! You! David Duke guy! Yeah, we've never spoken but I don't want your vote! The anti defamation league is telling me you're racist and to condemn you...so I'm doing it on t.v." When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? I think based on the interview where this came from that Donald Trump did the best he could have. It was basically: "Gotcha!" "I'm not going to play that game." The "interview" was: "the anti defamation league has asked you to publicly condemn unequivocally the racism of former kkk grand wizard david duke who recently said 'voting against you is treason to your heritage'...will you unequivocally condemn david duke and say you don't want his vote or other white supremacists in this election?" "Just so you know I don't know anything about david duke or what you're talking about with white supremacy or supremacists did he endorse me or what's going on because I know nothing about david duke I know nothing about white supremacists and so you're asking me a question about people I know nothing about...." "The question from the anti defamation league is even if you don't know about their endorsements there are these groups and individuals endorsing you would you just say unequivocally you condemn them and you don't want their support?" "Well I'd have to look at the group. I don't know what group you're talking about. Who would want me to condemn a group I know nothing about? If you would send me a list of the groups I would do some research on them and certainly I would disavow if I thought there was something wrong but you may have groups in there that may be fine and it would be very unfair, so send me a list of the groups and I'll let you know." "I'm just talking about david duke and the kkk." "Honestly I don't know david duke, I don't believe I've ever met him, I'm pretty sure I've never met him, I just don't know anything about him." Remember how much crap Obama got for beergate and treyvon martin for offering his opinion and sticking his nose where it really shouldn't have been, based on a lack of, or biased, information? How about bush invading iraq? You would be okay if Trump knee jerk reacted to "they're racists! You condemn them, right? You gotta do something about this right now! Don't think, you don't need information, just condemn, condemn, invade, err, condemn, I used the magic 'they're racists' words." except, this is Trump so him disavowing or telling people he doesn't want their vote is pretty much par for the course not allowing muslims in? considering a muslim registry? stating a 'preference' for veterans that weren't captured? but condemning racists is something that would be ,,,,what? risky? i'm missing what the problem is about the muslims... why shouldn't they be singled out when they are the ones acting up? i'm also missing your point about the veterans... Obarry has pretty much dismissed them all, DT wants them to have something to show for serving their country... why would that be a problem for you? this is not about me or whats a problem for me its a thread about why Trump did not respond in the negative about Duke or the KKK the argument was made that it would be unreasonable for him to publically tell people that he basically doesn't want their vote the COUNTER to that argument is that TRUMPS past behavior negates considering whats reasonable or not,, and especially any concern for what 'votes' he gets since he insults so many groups so regularly and has declared his realization that his followers don't give a crap who he offends , murdering someone would not cost him one vote' so why think he believes disavowing the KKK would? who cares? why don't you go ask him about the black panthers? or what he thinks about pink tutu's? you and your liberal friends are just trying to trap him on his answers to stupid questions... Duke said he supports trump, trump never said anything about Duke, did he? the liberals aren't really smart enough to make an effective smear campaign... you asked a question and it was answered, whether you care or not is your business you asked a question and i answered it.... like i said, liberals aren't really smart enough to trap most people into answering stupid questions... you, like the rest of the libs, are just fishing for something to rant on about, by implying things that just aren't there... lie, cheat and steal, is that the libs motto? trump has done nothing thats racist, and here you libs are putting words in his mouth... if he didn't want peoples votes, then he wouldn't be running for president... you can try and spin it any way you want, but thats all there is to it... is it getting to the point where anyone that says they'll vote for trump is a racist, just like anyone who didn't like obarry is a racist? you libs are really getting foolish with this crap, and people are seeing through all the liberal BS... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Mon 02/29/16 03:02 PM
|
|
Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK) Without looking him up on Wikipedia all I know about the guy is at some point he had something to do with the KKK. Is that enough to condemn him and tell him his vote isn't wanted, completely unprovoked? Just go on air and say "hey! You! David Duke guy! Yeah, we've never spoken but I don't want your vote! The anti defamation league is telling me you're racist and to condemn you...so I'm doing it on t.v." When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? I think based on the interview where this came from that Donald Trump did the best he could have. It was basically: "Gotcha!" "I'm not going to play that game." The "interview" was: "the anti defamation league has asked you to publicly condemn unequivocally the racism of former kkk grand wizard david duke who recently said 'voting against you is treason to your heritage'...will you unequivocally condemn david duke and say you don't want his vote or other white supremacists in this election?" "Just so you know I don't know anything about david duke or what you're talking about with white supremacy or supremacists did he endorse me or what's going on because I know nothing about david duke I know nothing about white supremacists and so you're asking me a question about people I know nothing about...." "The question from the anti defamation league is even if you don't know about their endorsements there are these groups and individuals endorsing you would you just say unequivocally you condemn them and you don't want their support?" "Well I'd have to look at the group. I don't know what group you're talking about. Who would want me to condemn a group I know nothing about? If you would send me a list of the groups I would do some research on them and certainly I would disavow if I thought there was something wrong but you may have groups in there that may be fine and it would be very unfair, so send me a list of the groups and I'll let you know." "I'm just talking about david duke and the kkk." "Honestly I don't know david duke, I don't believe I've ever met him, I'm pretty sure I've never met him, I just don't know anything about him." Remember how much crap Obama got for beergate and treyvon martin for offering his opinion and sticking his nose where it really shouldn't have been, based on a lack of, or biased, information? How about bush invading iraq? You would be okay if Trump knee jerk reacted to "they're racists! You condemn them, right? You gotta do something about this right now! Don't think, you don't need information, just condemn, condemn, invade, err, condemn, I used the magic 'they're racists' words." except, this is Trump so him disavowing or telling people he doesn't want their vote is pretty much par for the course not allowing muslims in? considering a muslim registry? stating a 'preference' for veterans that weren't captured? but condemning racists is something that would be ,,,,what? risky? i'm missing what the problem is about the muslims... why shouldn't they be singled out when they are the ones acting up? i'm also missing your point about the veterans... Obarry has pretty much dismissed them all, DT wants them to have something to show for serving their country... why would that be a problem for you? this is not about me or whats a problem for me its a thread about why Trump did not respond in the negative about Duke or the KKK the argument was made that it would be unreasonable for him to publically tell people that he basically doesn't want their vote the COUNTER to that argument is that TRUMPS past behavior negates considering whats reasonable or not,, and especially any concern for what 'votes' he gets since he insults so many groups so regularly and has declared his realization that his followers don't give a crap who he offends , murdering someone would not cost him one vote' so why think he believes disavowing the KKK would? who cares? why don't you go ask him about the black panthers? or what he thinks about pink tutu's? you and your liberal friends are just trying to trap him on his answers to stupid questions... Duke said he supports trump, trump never said anything about Duke, did he? the liberals aren't really smart enough to make an effective smear campaign... you asked a question and it was answered, whether you care or not is your business you asked a question and i answered it.... like i said, liberals aren't really smart enough to trap most people into answering stupid questions... you, like the rest of the libs, are just fishing for something to rant on about, by implying things that just aren't there... lie, cheat and steal, is that the libs motto? trump has done nothing thats racist, and here you libs are putting words in his mouth... if he didn't want peoples votes, then he wouldn't be running for president... you can try and spin it any way you want, but thats all there is to it... is it getting to the point where anyone that says they'll vote for trump is a racist, just like anyone who didn't like obarry is a racist? you libs are really getting foolish with this crap, and people are seeing through all the liberal BS... I am not fishing at all I am answering questions,, and like many minglers,, getting responses that are questions meant to distract from or discredit the answer followed by more statements to try to distract or discredit the legitimate responses that have been given to the original distraction I am getting better at ignoring such nonsense distraction,, but still not perfect ,,,''my bad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
mightymoe
on
Mon 02/29/16 03:05 PM
|
|
Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK) Without looking him up on Wikipedia all I know about the guy is at some point he had something to do with the KKK. Is that enough to condemn him and tell him his vote isn't wanted, completely unprovoked? Just go on air and say "hey! You! David Duke guy! Yeah, we've never spoken but I don't want your vote! The anti defamation league is telling me you're racist and to condemn you...so I'm doing it on t.v." When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? I think based on the interview where this came from that Donald Trump did the best he could have. It was basically: "Gotcha!" "I'm not going to play that game." The "interview" was: "the anti defamation league has asked you to publicly condemn unequivocally the racism of former kkk grand wizard david duke who recently said 'voting against you is treason to your heritage'...will you unequivocally condemn david duke and say you don't want his vote or other white supremacists in this election?" "Just so you know I don't know anything about david duke or what you're talking about with white supremacy or supremacists did he endorse me or what's going on because I know nothing about david duke I know nothing about white supremacists and so you're asking me a question about people I know nothing about...." "The question from the anti defamation league is even if you don't know about their endorsements there are these groups and individuals endorsing you would you just say unequivocally you condemn them and you don't want their support?" "Well I'd have to look at the group. I don't know what group you're talking about. Who would want me to condemn a group I know nothing about? If you would send me a list of the groups I would do some research on them and certainly I would disavow if I thought there was something wrong but you may have groups in there that may be fine and it would be very unfair, so send me a list of the groups and I'll let you know." "I'm just talking about david duke and the kkk." "Honestly I don't know david duke, I don't believe I've ever met him, I'm pretty sure I've never met him, I just don't know anything about him." Remember how much crap Obama got for beergate and treyvon martin for offering his opinion and sticking his nose where it really shouldn't have been, based on a lack of, or biased, information? How about bush invading iraq? You would be okay if Trump knee jerk reacted to "they're racists! You condemn them, right? You gotta do something about this right now! Don't think, you don't need information, just condemn, condemn, invade, err, condemn, I used the magic 'they're racists' words." except, this is Trump so him disavowing or telling people he doesn't want their vote is pretty much par for the course not allowing muslims in? considering a muslim registry? stating a 'preference' for veterans that weren't captured? but condemning racists is something that would be ,,,,what? risky? i'm missing what the problem is about the muslims... why shouldn't they be singled out when they are the ones acting up? i'm also missing your point about the veterans... Obarry has pretty much dismissed them all, DT wants them to have something to show for serving their country... why would that be a problem for you? this is not about me or whats a problem for me its a thread about why Trump did not respond in the negative about Duke or the KKK the argument was made that it would be unreasonable for him to publically tell people that he basically doesn't want their vote the COUNTER to that argument is that TRUMPS past behavior negates considering whats reasonable or not,, and especially any concern for what 'votes' he gets since he insults so many groups so regularly and has declared his realization that his followers don't give a crap who he offends , murdering someone would not cost him one vote' so why think he believes disavowing the KKK would? who cares? why don't you go ask him about the black panthers? or what he thinks about pink tutu's? you and your liberal friends are just trying to trap him on his answers to stupid questions... Duke said he supports trump, trump never said anything about Duke, did he? the liberals aren't really smart enough to make an effective smear campaign... you asked a question and it was answered, whether you care or not is your business you asked a question and i answered it.... like i said, liberals aren't really smart enough to trap most people into answering stupid questions... you, like the rest of the libs, are just fishing for something to rant on about, by implying things that just aren't there... lie, cheat and steal, is that the libs motto? trump has done nothing thats racist, and here you libs are putting words in his mouth... if he didn't want peoples votes, then he wouldn't be running for president... you can try and spin it any way you want, but thats all there is to it... is it getting to the point where anyone that says they'll vote for trump is a racist, just like anyone who didn't like obarry is a racist? you libs are really getting foolish with this crap, and people are seeing through all the liberal BS... I am not fishing at all I am answering questions,, and like many minglers,, getting responses that are questions meant to distract from or discredit the answer followed by more statements to try to distract or discredit the legitimate responses that have been given to the original distraction I am getting better at ignoring such nonsense distraction,, but still not perfect ,,,''my bad you're the master of it...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conventionofstates.com. Check this website if you care about where you live,your country.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go see who Robert Bird was with
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, it's all over CNN, YouTube and all media. Was willing to overlook alot of things to make a change in Washington DC. Now Da Donald is pretending not to know who David Duke is, (Grand Wizard Leader of KKK). They were supporting each other when running for president under the Republican reform ticket. When asked to renounce David Duke, Trump stated that he did not know who he was. What do you think? The supporting the KKK is blown completely out of proportion. His damn ear piece malfunctioned and couldn't make out the conversation, and that was CONFIRMED by some media staff who were present. It's amazing how when a moron like Dr. David Duke says he is voting for Trump they run with it and say it's an endorsement. Dr. Duke once again is puling an A Sharpton and trying to get media attention. He said he is "NOT" endorsing Mr. Trump but voting for him and ONLY voting for him because he wants to work with Russia and prevent World War 3 and blasted Mr. Trump for being a friend to the Jews and Israel. It's funny when a FORMER Klansman, who has NEVER advocated violence and renounced the Klan but who happens to be was a lifelong Democrat who registered Republican to win an election in a Conservative state and the Liberals say the whole party is racist when the Liberals themselves have had more former Klansmen in the House and Senate including a former Grand Wizard one who was 3rd in line to the Presidency and was praised by Hillary Clinton, Senator Sanders, President Obama, Senator Kennedy and a Liberal icon Robert Byrd. I love the hypocrisy! |
|
|
|
|
