Topic: Removing M.L.K. Jr's Plaque | |
---|---|
Watters World
Watters' World Defends Martin Luther King, Jr. from the PC Gender Mob Published February 9, 2016 Fox Nation: Students at the University of Oregon are looking to remove a Martin Luther King, Jr. “I Have a Dream” plaque because it wasn't sensitive to "gender identity." Fox News correspondent Jesse Watters visited the campus to investigate. Watters: What’s the vibe on campus? Describe it for me. “I don’t know. I’m mostly just feeling midterm stress, so I can’t really get a feeling for the vibe proper.” Watters: Alright, I’m stressed out, too. I work for Bill O’Reilly. Watters: So, what are you studying here? “Japanese and German.” Watters: Oh, kaboom. Watters: This building right here, they’re debating whether or not to remove a Martin Luther King quotation from ‘I have a dream’ because it wasn’t inclusive enough for gender identity issues. “I definitely, definitely think gender identity issues are important, but I don’t think that we need to remove a quote. I think it’d be great to add something.” “I’d like a very empowering feminist rights quote.” Watters: Like ‘Go women. Men stink.’ “Taking away from MLK…there’s something wrong with that.” Watters: Can you believe all these white students taking down the Martin Luther King quote? “If they take it off the campus, the black community is going to be disrespected. It’s Black History Month.” “To remove it would be rude to African-Americans, especially since we’re still fighting that battle today.” “There’s a time and place for everyone in every community, and we need to let the black community have their time.” Watters: Do you feel excluded in any way, shape, or form on this campus? “Yes.” Watters: How so? “I am not white.” Watters: What exactly does gender identity mean? You can choose your own gender? “Um, in my understanding, yes. My gender is unicorn.” Watters: Are you serious? “Yeah.” Watters: Can I say self-identify as a dinosaur? Watters: What if we put a Caitlyn Jenner quote next to the MLK quote? “Caitlyn Jenner does not represent all non-gender binary conforming people. I’m sorry that’s confusing.” Watters: You said you’re transman. What does that mean? “It means I’m transgender and a boy.” Watters: Born a man… “I mean I was born a baby.” “So if we wanted to add some queer historical figures ...?” Watters: You can’t say that word, queer. That’s offensive. “I am queer.” Watters: Because when I use the word "queer," people say I can’t say that. “Okay, well are you queer?” Watters: Do I look queer? “I assume you’re straight in a sense.” Watters: Do I sound straight? That’s offensive. O’Reilly’s Take: O’Reilly: Now that is the best argument for Bernie Sanders’ free tuition for everybody. Watters: It’s bad out there. O’Reilly: Beautiful campus, but you must go searching. Do you have a sign ‘If you’re strange, I want to talk to you’? Watters: Anybody with crazy looking hair, I say you gotta come over here. No, but the truth is the quote is going to stay. O’Reilly: Alright! It’s gonna stay, but… Watters: It was just one radical that stirred up trouble. The quote’s there. There may be a gender quote next to it…but the king stays. O’Reilly: A gender quote. Watters: Who knows what that is. O’Reilly: Well, let’s ask the viewers to provide some and then send it over to the University of Oregon. Watters: That could be scary. http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/02/08/watters-world-defends-martin-luther-king-jr-pc-gender-mob?cmpid=NL_foxnation/ February 9, 2016 http://www.mediaite.com/tv/jesse-watters-gets-to-the-bottom-of-college-mlk-quote-controversy/ http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2016/01/27/oregon-students-weighed-removing-martin-luther-king-quote-from-student-union-as-being-insufficiently-inclusive/ January 27, 2016 |
|
|
|
Wait.....but yet the other side protests stupid crap?
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Serchin4MyRedWine
on
Tue 02/09/16 11:35 AM
|
|
They ended up not changing or removing the MLK quote |
|
|
|
They ended up not changing or removing the
True...but they WERE considering it...and the reason?
MLK quote "" But as renovation continues, the Oregon Student Union seriously considered replacing that quote. “The quote is not going to change,” reports student paper Oregon Daily Emerald, “but that decision was not made without some hard thought by the Student Union Board.” When the student union considered the question, some students asked, “Does the MLK quote represent us today?” The problem wasn’t so much the message, but the fact that it only focused on racial diversity instead of gender identity."" http://www.mediaite.com/online/u-of-oregon-debates-removing-mlk-quote-for-not-being-inclusive-enough/ These people are 100%, certifiable whackjobs. Need more proof? Sure, here it is: "" Watters: What exactly does gender identity mean? You can choose your own gender? “Um, in my understanding, yes. My gender is unicorn.”" |
|
|
|
Sure take down.. Take it all.
If people are offended. With the NEOSEGREGATIONIST movement.. We might as well. For the sake of GENDER NEUTRAL What's good for the goose is good for the gander right? In the name of equality right? We all have to give a little... Or a hell of a lot. ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Tue 02/09/16 11:31 AM
|
|
Grade-A Brainrot!
|
|
|
|
That's what happens when Liberal's run a state.
MLK Jr. was a great man, he my have been a flawed man but who isn't? He broke down a lot of doors for African American's and has done more then any other civil or women's rights activist in history. |
|
|
|
"" Watters: What exactly does gender identity mean? You can choose your own gender? “Um, in my understanding, yes. My gender is unicorn.”" #GenderNeutralUnicornLivesMatter Oooh.. Oh geez.. The future.. ![]() "Pink Fluffy Unicorns Dancing on Rainbows" Fan Video: http://youtu.be/cg5DL-JCE0M/ 01:02 February 8, 2016 |
|
|
|
I don't even think 'gender' had been created and indoctrinated into culture in the sixties |
|
|
|
I don't even think 'gender' had been created and indoctrinated into culture in the sixties ![]() |
|
|
|
true,, true,,, no argument there
![]() |
|
|
|
Frankly, I'm for removing ALL of the MLK monuments everywhere, AND getting rid of the federal holiday because his originally noble intent has turned into a complete atrocity not deserving of memorization in the slightest. I would then replace them with JFK monuments and institute JFK day as a federal holiday in their place...at least THAT didn't lead to a bunch of crack-smoking thieves whom complain about their rights when arrested by the police for their crimes.
|
|
|
|
Frankly, I'm for removing ALL of the MLK monuments everywhere, AND getting rid of the federal holiday because his originally noble intent has turned into a complete atrocity not deserving of memorization in the slightest. I would then replace them with JFK monuments and institute JFK day as a federal holiday in their place...at least THAT didn't lead to a bunch of crack-smoking thieves whom complain about their rights when arrested by the police for their crimes. Damn , sometimes the trurh is funny |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Frankly, I'm for removing ALL of the MLK monuments everywhere, AND getting rid of the federal holiday because his originally noble intent has turned into a complete atrocity not deserving of memorization in the slightest. I would then replace them with JFK monuments and institute JFK day as a federal holiday in their place...at least THAT didn't lead to a bunch of crack-smoking thieves whom complain about their rights when arrested by the police for their crimes. wow, now that's sound logic,NOT unless of course one is suffering the delusion that drugs and theft only began happening after the sixties and the civil rights movment,,,lol '' |
|
|