Topic: Our Speaker of the House of Representatives | |
---|---|
Boy, are we in trouble... terrible, terrible trouble (as Professor Harold Hill would say in "The Music Man".) This woman is frightening. Take special note of the last paragraph. Is she really this whacked out? To think that she is #3 in line for the Presidency! Pray for a long life for Prresident Bush and VP Cheney! You aren't going to believe this. Madam speaker Nancy Pelosi wants to put a windfall tax on all stock market profits (including retirement fund, 401Ks and mutual funds! Alas, it is true - all to help the 12 million Illegal Immigrants and other unemployed minorities! Nancy Pelosi condemned the new record highs of the stock market as "just another example of Bush policies helping the rich get richer". "First Bush cut taxes for the rich and the economy has rebounded with new record low unemployment rates, which only means wealthy employers are getting even wealthier at the expense of the underpaid working class." So low unemployment is BAD? She went on to say "Despite the billions of dollars being spent in Iraq our economy is still strong and government tax revenues are at all time highs. What this really means is that business is exploiting the war effort and working Americans, just to put money in their own pockets." This woman is certifiable! When questioned about recent stock market highs she responded "Only the rich benefit from these record highs. Working Americans, welfare recipients, the unemployed and minorities are not sharing in these obscene record highs. There is no question these windfall profits and incom created by th Bush administration need to be taxed at 100% rate and those dollars redistributed to the poor and working class. Profits from the stock market do not reward the hard work of our working class who, by their hard work, are responsible for generating these corporate profits that create stock market profits for the rich. We in congress will need to address this issue to either tax these profits or to control the stock market to prevent this unearned income to flow to the rich." And the working class would be where without employers? When asked about the fact that over 80% of all Americans have investments in mutual funds, retirement funds, 401Ks, and the stock market she replied "That may be true, but probably only 5% account for 90% of all these investment dollars. That's just more "trickle down" economics claiming that if a corporation is successful that everyone from the CEO to the floor sweeper benefit from higher wages and job security which is ridiculous. How much of this 'trickle down' ever gets to the unemployed and minorities in our county? None, and that's the tragedy of these stock market highs." Sure, all investors are "fat cats." "We democrats are going to address this issue after the election when we take control of the congress. We will return to the 60% to 80% tax rates on the rich and we will be able to take at least 30% of all current lower income tax payers off the rolls and increase government income substantially." We need to work toward the goal of equalizing income in our country and at the same time limiting the amount the rich can invest." Yes, higher taxes worked out so well during the Carter administration. When asked how these new tax dollars would be spent, she replied : "We need to raise the standard of living of our poor, unemployed and minorities. For example, we have an estimated 12 million illegal immigrants in our country who need our help along with millions of unemployed minorities. Stock market windfall profits taxes could go a long ways to guarantee these people the standard of living they would like to have as 'Americans'." Illegal immigrants need our help alright -- to find their way to the nearest exit point from the U.S. |
|
|
|
here comes the hate mail Chopper!! Try living in her district. She's not the only half-cocked spouter on the West Coast!!! Sounds like she doesn't know anything about inflation. I don't hear a peep about how much her humble abode out here is worth! I think I'll vote for her too! and go on welfare. That's the drift, isn't it. By the time this posts, your thread could already be dead!!
|
|
|
|
This report I checked out, searched for a copy of the original quote. I found a link http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/pelosi.asp
which highlights this comment as a rumor and labels it as false. Originally posted somewhere October 22, 2006 Now personally I dislike Pelosi's politics, and it would trouble me, shock me and make me want to be critical of her, if this were true. But I just don't think it is. I'll add the final word, fortunately. It would be hard to imagine someone wanting to crush the market, even her. The logic is just too screwy. Certainly an interesting article though. Made me stop and shake my head. If you can find anything to substantiate it further I'd share it with some of my economist friends just for a laugh. |
|
|
|
Thanks Phiosopher, I was about to ask for substantiation myself.
I just got done doing about 5 hours of research for paper I have to write. Political (surprise) and of course NP was a great part of that research. She does tend to be quite socialistic in her views but I didn't see where she was as totally dogmatic as the OP presents. But then I was was doing research on another topic. |
|
|