If you google the "25 most dangerous countries to live in", you will be amazed and startled to read they are mostly Islamic countries. Aint they supposedly a "peaceful" Religion? Why why?

You are probably right but it would work a little better if you would post the source of your information. In all matters worthy of consideration, "consider the source" comes into play.

Hence my word; "If you google....."

The whole world is dangerous...Let's go to the outer space....Oh and here will will not survive without the Supreme Being called the God of Israel.
We will perish everywhere without Him...
Here or there..or in Syria....in every place...
The world He created is being destroyed...
Everything will end soon...
But He is the END and the Beginning...This is His name and His nature.
He exists and will exist and existed. This is His name we utter in Hebrew Yahweh YHWH.

Yahweh could theoretically be a hif'il (causative) verb inflection of root HWH, with a meaning something like "he who causes to exist" or "who gives life" (the root idea of the word being "to breathe", and hence, "to live") or "He causes to become". As a qal (basic stem) verb inflection, it could mean "he who is, who exists".

One of the main names of the God of Israel is "Ehyeh asher ehyeh".

Hayah means "existed" or "was" in Hebrew; "ehyeh" is the first person singular imperfect form and is usually translated in English Bibles as "I will be" (or "I shall be"), for example, at Exodus 3:14. Ehyeh asher ehyeh literally translates as "I Will Be What I Will Be". However, in most English Bibles, in particular the King James Version, the phrase is rendered as I am that I am.

So, Ehyeh-Asher-Ehyeh was translated into English as "I AM".
But this name means: "I am that I am", or "I shall be what I shall be", "I shall be what I am" or "I will become what I choose to become", " I Will Become whatsoever I please".

He who gives life and causes us to exist YHWH is your God. He is our Shelter, Shield and Defense on this planet and in any place He will put us...

If Islam makes a place dangerous, then I certainly wouldn't want to live in any nation where Boko Haram is active. Just saying.

But some people want to be there for some reason...

Boko Haram is "active" in a secular state, not in Islamic country. They are just active in three northen states out of the 37 states of that country

because of greed and their being monolithic and having so little to loose

wealthier countries, where the people are not as impoverished, manifest their greed in more non violent ways, because people try to keep what they have and have the belief that they can attain more,,,


mostly islamic countries have much more poverty too,,,but thats an issue for another discussion

Your response is always apt. Indeed, poverty is a major factor. Anybody who is living for nothing is always ready to die for nothing. But some of the countries mentioned aint poor!

Because western countries keep arming people they shouldn't, mess with power structures, try and infect them with westernized cultures like an STD sometimes (in the past) in order to fight against the STD of communism, preemptively invade and occupy before running away, cause all sorts of economic imbalances via natural resource demand or just throwing money at problems, and generally contribute to chaos in a culture they don't really understand simply because they have the power to do so?

Or IOW because some countries feel they know best and can solve everybody's problems, create other problems with their solutions, which then compound on each other, and then wonder why everything isn't just immediately fixed?

oh, that makes it ok then...

we didn't use it on people, just on plants... the side effects on people were unknown at the time... one of the reasons we invaded Iraq was saddam using mustard gas on his own people...hitler also used it to kill 6 million people in gas chambers...

Uh, do you not know why the USA used the atomic bomb to end WWII?

I'd guess that the victims of Boko Haram would consider Nigeria to be a dangerous place. Just saying.

"Google" is not a source. It is a search engine.

I can google any topic and come up with both pros and cons. I was suggesting that you post whatever source you are reading to gain your initial impression, opinion, 'facts', or whatever.

There are several Islamic countries that everyone would agree are dangerous. I was just pointing out that asking someone to google anything is not a focused approach to generating opinion since the opinions vary with the actual source.

yea, you'd think... but the 50's and 60's weren't as stringent liberal as they are now...

Why did you avoid answering my question?