100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: I am a Muslim atheist | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
what i don't get is there are more men doing these things then women, why isn't anyone in Islam shouting they (men) should be put to death as well? after all, she had to get the STD from a man.. should they be put to death as well? anyone the goes against what "god" says should be put to death?
if a "god" is that strict on it's rules and regulations, then the god should be doing the killing, not me or you for god... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hold it Mightymoe... You said these women weren't guilty of anything that are getting stoned-to-death. But this article is about Adultery! Yes, the Quran does prescribe stoning for Adultery. Now, before You reply Mightymoe... I want You to think about this. If 'Your Wife' (Hypothetical Situation Here) was sleeping with other men, and You'd found out every-one of those whom You thought were Your children was actually somebody else's, and You couldn't figure-out why Your body was so riddled with S.T.D.s, and she was REMORSELESS what would YOU want to do? ********* TAKE YOUR TIME ANSWERING THIS ONE ********* Then she should be charged with the following: * knowingly transmitting an STD for each STD * Paternity fraud Conviction on the first would have her listed as a registered sex offender and carry a fine and jail time. Conviction on the second would result in loss of property, jail time and restitution. Should she be brutally murdered? No, we aren't animals. So, I'm assuming You're the sort of person who'd never have cause to EXICUTE anybody, no-matter what their crime may be? And I'm assuming You're quite content to have this person (Upon Having Done Their Jail Time) to go back into society in general and just continue their remorseless, contemptible, endangering, life-style... ? Right? She'd probably end-up on Your door-step, again! 
and your content with taking her life? kinda the marines motto, kill them all and let god sort them out... i guess muslim men are the "hammer" of god, since they decide who god wants dead...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hold it Mightymoe... You said these women weren't guilty of anything that are getting stoned-to-death. But this article is about Adultery! Yes, the Quran does prescribe stoning for Adultery. Now, before You reply Mightymoe... I want You to think about this. If 'Your Wife' (Hypothetical Situation Here) was sleeping with other men, and You'd found out every-one of those whom You thought were Your children was actually somebody else's, and You couldn't figure-out why Your body was so riddled with S.T.D.s, and she was REMORSELESS what would YOU want to do? ********* TAKE YOUR TIME ANSWERING THIS ONE ********* nothing i could do but chalk it up to my bad decision... i'm not that stupid to let that happen, in any regards... so do not try to justify this to me, sharia law is a weak mans way to control women, no matter what spin you try to put on it... there is no justification for it, there is no right with it... "rape" is considered adultery in sharia law, and even without being raped, any woman has every right to commit adultery without going to prison or a beating, or dying for it... all sharia law does it take every right away from women, and gives men the power over them because they are weak minded and scared of the woman having a life without them.... now let me ask you this: whats the penalty difference if a man commits adultery under sharia law? Good for You Moe, You're not that stupid to let that happen. <---- Sarcasm Folks ---<<< Firstly, in reply to Your question... I don't know WHO Sharia is and I'm unacquainted with her laws! (Little Joke Here Folks) Adultery, for a man is defined by the oldest ecclesiastical definition; A man who has conjugal relations with another man's wife is guilty of Adultery. The definition of Adultery for a woman, by the oldest ecclesiastical definition; A Woman that has conjugal relations with any-other man other than her husband. Both carry the death penalty in the Quran and are only enforceable in a sovereign Islamic state. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what i don't get is there are more men doing these things then women, why isn't anyone in Islam shouting they (men) should be put to death as well? after all, she had to get the STD from a man.. should they be put to death as well? anyone the goes against what "god" says should be put to death? if a "god" is that strict on it's rules and regulations, then the god should be doing the killing, not me or you for god... My best friend is gay. He told me about an Arab Muslim he dated, who told him homosexual sex is REALLY common in the Middle East. Most of the men there do it at some point or another. It's only a crime to be the bottom, they never prosecute the tops. Kind of the same thing here, only the woman is persecuted aggressively. It truly is a "boys will be boys" attitude over there. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hold it Mightymoe... You said these women weren't guilty of anything that are getting stoned-to-death. But this article is about Adultery! Yes, the Quran does prescribe stoning for Adultery. Now, before You reply Mightymoe... I want You to think about this. If 'Your Wife' (Hypothetical Situation Here) was sleeping with other men, and You'd found out every-one of those whom You thought were Your children was actually somebody else's, and You couldn't figure-out why Your body was so riddled with S.T.D.s, and she was REMORSELESS what would YOU want to do? ********* TAKE YOUR TIME ANSWERING THIS ONE ********* nothing i could do but chalk it up to my bad decision... i'm not that stupid to let that happen, in any regards... so do not try to justify this to me, sharia law is a weak mans way to control women, no matter what spin you try to put on it... there is no justification for it, there is no right with it... "rape" is considered adultery in sharia law, and even without being raped, any woman has every right to commit adultery without going to prison or a beating, or dying for it... all sharia law does it take every right away from women, and gives men the power over them because they are weak minded and scared of the woman having a life without them.... now let me ask you this: whats the penalty difference if a man commits adultery under sharia law? Good for You Moe, You're not that stupid to let that happen. <---- Sarcasm Folks ---<<< Firstly, in reply to Your question... I don't know WHO Sharia is and I'm unacquainted with her laws! (Little Joke Here Folks) Adultery, for a man is defined by the oldest ecclesiastical definition; A man who has conjugal relations with another man's wife is guilty of Adultery. The definition of Adultery for a woman, by the oldest ecclesiastical definition; A Woman that has conjugal relations with any-other man other than her husband. Both carry the death penalty in the Quran and are only enforceable in a sovereign Islamic state. i'm hoping you can see the difference between the two statements you just made, sheik... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hold it Mightymoe... You said these women weren't guilty of anything that are getting stoned-to-death. But this article is about Adultery! Yes, the Quran does prescribe stoning for Adultery. Now, before You reply Mightymoe... I want You to think about this. If 'Your Wife' (Hypothetical Situation Here) was sleeping with other men, and You'd found out every-one of those whom You thought were Your children was actually somebody else's, and You couldn't figure-out why Your body was so riddled with S.T.D.s, and she was REMORSELESS what would YOU want to do? ********* TAKE YOUR TIME ANSWERING THIS ONE ********* Then she should be charged with the following: * knowingly transmitting an STD for each STD * Paternity fraud Conviction on the first would have her listed as a registered sex offender and carry a fine and jail time. Conviction on the second would result in loss of property, jail time and restitution. Should she be brutally murdered? No, we aren't animals. So, I'm assuming You're the sort of person who'd never have cause to EXICUTE anybody, no-matter what their crime may be? And I'm assuming You're quite content to have this person (Upon Having Done Their Jail Time) to go back into society in general and just continue their remorseless, contemptible, endangering, life-style... ? Right? She'd probably end-up on Your door-step, again!
I believe in redemption, mercy and forgiveness, so I don't really support the death penalty. I believe that everyone should have every opportunity to come to the lord, prisons exist for a reason: to hold criminals. She would spend her time in prison, which would amount to decades, be released and have a restraining order on her for her victims, just like any other sex offender would. If she ended up on my door-step, it would be a violation of her parole and back to prison with her. This is in a more perfect world, obviously. A woman's tears and begging has no effect on me, I know that it is manipulation with no real emotion. I can see through it. So even in this imperfect world, I wouldn't piss on such a woman if she was on fire, but I wouldn't wish her dead either. Remember, this person that's guilty of Adultery is REMORESLESS and when they're done this jail-time You prescribe, He/She will be able to inflict the same heart-ache on another innocent person. She/He, who is guilty of ruining countless families will have left a much greater wake of traumatised children by permitting them to function in society indefinitely. And what is set as an example for those children? You say, "I wouldn't piss on such a woman if she was on fire, but wouldn't wish her dead either." How long would 'YOU' be content to have her burn, without her dying? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hold it Mightymoe... You said these women weren't guilty of anything that are getting stoned-to-death. But this article is about Adultery! Yes, the Quran does prescribe stoning for Adultery. Now, before You reply Mightymoe... I want You to think about this. If 'Your Wife' (Hypothetical Situation Here) was sleeping with other men, and You'd found out every-one of those whom You thought were Your children was actually somebody else's, and You couldn't figure-out why Your body was so riddled with S.T.D.s, and she was REMORSELESS what would YOU want to do? ********* TAKE YOUR TIME ANSWERING THIS ONE ********* nothing i could do but chalk it up to my bad decision... i'm not that stupid to let that happen, in any regards... so do not try to justify this to me, sharia law is a weak mans way to control women, no matter what spin you try to put on it... there is no justification for it, there is no right with it... "rape" is considered adultery in sharia law, and even without being raped, any woman has every right to commit adultery without going to prison or a beating, or dying for it... all sharia law does it take every right away from women, and gives men the power over them because they are weak minded and scared of the woman having a life without them.... now let me ask you this: whats the penalty difference if a man commits adultery under sharia law? Good for You Moe, You're not that stupid to let that happen. <---- Sarcasm Folks ---<<< Firstly, in reply to Your question... I don't know WHO Sharia is and I'm unacquainted with her laws! (Little Joke Here Folks) Adultery, for a man is defined by the oldest ecclesiastical definition; A man who has conjugal relations with another man's wife is guilty of Adultery. The definition of Adultery for a woman, by the oldest ecclesiastical definition; A Woman that has conjugal relations with any-other man other than her husband. Both carry the death penalty in the Quran and are only enforceable in a sovereign Islamic state. i'm hoping you can see the difference between the two statements you just made, sheik... Which two statements in particular, Moe? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blondey, your reference about 72 virgins is a Hadith which I have no use for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remember, this person that's guilty of Adultery is REMORESLESS and when they're done this jail-time You prescribe, He/She will be able to inflict the same heart-ache on another innocent person. Now with a record and he/she would be easily found in an offender database. Then it's "buyer beware". She/He, who is guilty of ruining countless families will have left a much greater wake of traumatised children by permitting them to function in society indefinitely. And what is set as an example for those children? Are you really saying that we should murder women "for the children"? You say, "I wouldn't piss on such a woman if she was on fire, but wouldn't wish her dead either." How long would 'YOU' be content to have her burn, without her dying?
It's an idiom, I was being literal. I mean "I wouldn't go out of my way to help her, but I also don't wish her dead". I've got a great idea, why don't guys stop acting like dogs and screwing every woman who is willing? And women should stop having sex with every guy they meet. And anyone who has sex with another person has to reap the personal consequences of: catching an STD, spreading an STD to another person, ruining families. All terrible things, but none deserving of the death penalty. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
oh married men need to practice for the 72 virgins in store . As long as she is not another man's wife ... Wtf Everyone always comments on the 72 virgins, but they forget the 600 beautiful white boys who are like pearls and will do anything the man wants. For me, that's more twisted that 72 women, virgins or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hold it Mightymoe... You said these women weren't guilty of anything that are getting stoned-to-death. But this article is about Adultery! Yes, the Quran does prescribe stoning for Adultery. Now, before You reply Mightymoe... I want You to think about this. If 'Your Wife' (Hypothetical Situation Here) was sleeping with other men, and You'd found out every-one of those whom You thought were Your children was actually somebody else's, and You couldn't figure-out why Your body was so riddled with S.T.D.s, and she was REMORSELESS what would YOU want to do? ********* TAKE YOUR TIME ANSWERING THIS ONE ********* Then she should be charged with the following: * knowingly transmitting an STD for each STD * Paternity fraud Conviction on the first would have her listed as a registered sex offender and carry a fine and jail time. Conviction on the second would result in loss of property, jail time and restitution. Should she be brutally murdered? No, we aren't animals. So, I'm assuming You're the sort of person who'd never have cause to EXICUTE anybody, no-matter what their crime may be? And I'm assuming You're quite content to have this person (Upon Having Done Their Jail Time) to go back into society in general and just continue their remorseless, contemptible, endangering, life-style... ? Right? She'd probably end-up on Your door-step, again!
and your content with taking her life? Hey Mightymoe, Your Ex-Wife is on the way over to Your place, and she says 'You're late with the latest alimony cheque!' 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hold it Mightymoe... You said these women weren't guilty of anything that are getting stoned-to-death. But this article is about Adultery! Yes, the Quran does prescribe stoning for Adultery. Now, before You reply Mightymoe... I want You to think about this. If 'Your Wife' (Hypothetical Situation Here) was sleeping with other men, and You'd found out every-one of those whom You thought were Your children was actually somebody else's, and You couldn't figure-out why Your body was so riddled with S.T.D.s, and she was REMORSELESS what would YOU want to do? ********* TAKE YOUR TIME ANSWERING THIS ONE ********* Then she should be charged with the following: * knowingly transmitting an STD for each STD * Paternity fraud Conviction on the first would have her listed as a registered sex offender and carry a fine and jail time. Conviction on the second would result in loss of property, jail time and restitution. Should she be brutally murdered? No, we aren't animals. So, I'm assuming You're the sort of person who'd never have cause to EXICUTE anybody, no-matter what their crime may be? And I'm assuming You're quite content to have this person (Upon Having Done Their Jail Time) to go back into society in general and just continue their remorseless, contemptible, endangering, life-style... ? Right? She'd probably end-up on Your door-step, again!
and your content with taking her life? Hey Mightymoe, Your Ex-Wife is on the way over to Your place, and she says 'You're late with the latest alimony cheque!'
lol, hopefully she won't find me at the pub... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meanwhile, Blondey and Spidercmb are preoccupied with Hadiths that no Muslim in his right mind cares to know about.
Hey Spidercmb, are You a lawyer or is this old-hat for You? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remember, this person that's guilty of Adultery is REMORESLESS and when they're done this jail-time You prescribe, He/She will be able to inflict the same heart-ache on another innocent person. Now with a record and he/she would be easily found in an offender database. Then it's "buyer beware". She/He, who is guilty of ruining countless families will have left a much greater wake of traumatised children by permitting them to function in society indefinitely. And what is set as an example for those children? Are you really saying that we should murder women "for the children"? You say, "I wouldn't piss on such a woman if she was on fire, but wouldn't wish her dead either." How long would 'YOU' be content to have her burn, without her dying?
It's an idiom, I was being literal. I mean "I wouldn't go out of my way to help her, but I also don't wish her dead". I've got a great idea, why don't guys stop acting like dogs and screwing every woman who is willing? And women should stop having sex with every guy they meet. And anyone who has sex with another person has to reap the personal consequences of: catching an STD, spreading an STD to another person, ruining families. All terrible things, but none deserving of the death penalty. Attention all Mingle 2 users, Spidercmb recommends that every person on this site be screened on an 'offender database' before actually getting involved with them. Also, children that don't know who their father is and don't have any rights of inheritance should wonder, 'Who's in bed with Mom, now?' And last but not least, Spidercmb wouldn't go out of his way to keep any woman from not be tormented indefinitely, just so long as he can watch! (This Is Rich)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meanwhile, Blondey and Spidercmb are preoccupied with Hadiths that no Muslim in his right mind cares to know about.
Hey Spidercmb, are You a lawyer or is this old-hat for You?
Sexual relations for people who aren't married is also an offence, but it doesn't carry the death penalty. It falls into the category of fornication in which public flogging is prescribed. If the couple want to get married, then it's classed a consummate relationship and it's just a matter of getting hitched. (What Would Be Called A 'Shot-Gun Wedding' By Western Definition) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now I will explain why those 'TWO' definitions of Adultery are the oldest ecclesiastical definitions of Adultery.
Yes, there is a difference between the Male and from the Female. In short... It is only Adultery, when a 'married woman' is involved! The reason for this is that it has to do with children that are begotten from a marriage contract have rights of inheritance through the one lawful husband. If the woman isn't faithful to the one man, Who's children is she carrying? Who is the rightful father of her children. What man is going to subsidise his wife's boy-friend's children. On the other hand if a man has more than one wife, and all the wives are faithful to him, then all the children from all of the wives involved have rights of inheritance. Granted, the children will be carriers of the same father's name even if some, technically, are half-brothers and half-sisters. You asked earlier, "How's the harem?" My reply, 'THEY'RE JUST FINE !' Remember, I'm the shaken Sheihk Yur Booty, Blondey. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now I will explain why those 'TWO' definitions of Adultery are the oldest ecclesiastical definitions of Adultery. Yes, there is a difference between the Male and from the Female. In short... It is only Adultery, when a 'married woman' is involved! The reason for this is that it has to do with children that are begotten from a marriage contract have rights of inheritance through the one lawful husband. If the woman isn't faithful to the one man, Who's children is she carrying? Who is the rightful father of her children. What man is going to subsidise his wife's boy-friend's children. On the other hand if a man has more than one wife, and all the wives are faithful to him, then all the children from all of the wives involved have rights of inheritance. Granted, the children will be carriers of the same father's name even if some, technically, are half-brothers and half-sisters. You asked earlier, "How's the harem?" My reply, 'THEY'RE JUST FINE !' Remember, I'm the shaken Sheihk Yur Booty, Blondey.
like i said, women are mere possessions in muslim mens eyes... they have no rights other than bearing a mans child... thats why it's ok for a man to marry them as young as 8 years old...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Blondey, your reference about 72 virgins is a Hadith which I have no use for. Does not the original say72 white grapes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why the Hell would any Muslim want to marry a eight year old child.
Have You been reading 'Hadiths' too, Moe? Really, that's disgusting! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TB Rich...!
I was just speaking of You to the guy who started this thread. Hang On... ! I'll see if he's still on. |
|
|
|
|
