Happy new year to you too...
If you're looking to find the kind of relationship you're looking for, sans vague written description of it, I'm sure there're a few girls out there who could be up for your offer... But.. As the saying goes... Be careful what you ask for...

Davidben1: thank you again for being mature about it. Look ALL THESE RESPONDERS, have made an accurate point, beside yourself no one has answered my question. I have want a relationship where sex is the main object without the emotions, but I don't want to sound like an ******* when I say that. Just want to know what a girl would want to know when a guys says that. Just to show a girl the respect that she deserves

If you want a relationship that involves sexual intercourse, then you do not want a platonic relationship.

welcome to the real world...

where the reality that is good has been taught to be what is good to each them self. transposed unto all others.

based only upon what each one them self did feel, want, seek, and value, for them self...

clearly a dead end for each and all.

then we sea clearly why the whole world need a new better way.

happy new year to all.

I will say it again in case someone is a bit confused.
If you want a relationship that involves sexual intercourse, then you do not want a platonic relationship.

he already said he agreed and mis writ his words...

several times.

Errr... Since the topic you posted was "perspective on platonic relationship" but the message written was quite opposite of that... It does come off as deceptive, so that would lead to making you sound like an ******.
On the other hand, you can't really, seriously delude yourself into believing that "respecting" an individual, whether male or female, is possible when one is only going to compartmentalize the other for the sole purpose of physical pleasure. That's objectifying and downright NOT respectful. Since you have said yourself that you were raised by independent women, and because of it you were raised to be respectful of women... Then why not ask them their insight on your question. I'm sure they can be more helpful in advising you regarding your dilemma.
As for the topic on here, it's purely platonic... But then, that's just my perspective.

Dodo-David this will be my 3rd time that I have explain myself I ment to say "platonic & physical relationship" agony I will repeat myself

Man That sounds a lot like being married.

Ah. So, you want the physical without the sexual intercourse, because no platonic relationship involves sexual intercourse.

Got it.

Happy New Year! Cheers!

what the hell...

all that was said was basically "how do i create or have a 'friends with benefits' relationship"...

does not most the world recognize the words 'friends with benefits'...

does not such than belie the most meaning?

some fight for semantics just to prove them self right, and sum fight for happy, equal and fair unto all.

it's not hard to sea which is which.

when the chips are played.

have another gin and stop being so damn finicky and a semanticist.

In the OP, he said that he wanted a platonic relationship. That is why this discussion thread has turned out the way that it is.

uh huh...

true...

but he changed that as the most meaning many posts ago.

maybe you didn't sea that post.

anyhow...

semantics are boring.

So, the author of the OP does not want a platonic relationship. Got it.

smiles...

it was when one said that it self made such same "mistake", that things become too personal.

there are plenty plenty plenty of women in the world who want a friends with benefits relationship as well...

it's not really such a big moral deal.

for what decides mortality more than the two involved in any case that exist, both want the same thing, and agree with each other, about their acceptance of what each them self are willing to give and commit.

justa sayin

Here is a discussion thread recap for newcomers, so that they won't have to read the previous three pages.

In the OP, the author stated that he wanted a "platonic" relationship.

Discovering that the author of the OP used the word "platonic", Inigo Montoya appeared in the thread and said,



Inigo Montoya was correct, because the author of the OP realized that he doesn't want a platonic relationship.

If I am not mistaken, the author of the OP merely wants to have casual sexual intercourse with a woman who will not have any emotional attachment to him.

Now, the author of the OP wants advice on how to get what he wants.

Well, that is how I interpret what the author of the OP wants. However, I do make mistakes.

Pretty accurate cliff note, I'd say

wow.

was not such readily apparent by the thread topic, and readily observed and spoken by the op many posts ago?

so why the self elation over trivial semantics?

to win?

what is one winning?

it self as correct?

and what does that gain for one self?