Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: Fuhrer Ruins Couples Dream Wedding, So He Could Play Golf
Lpdon Joined Thu 02/25/10 Posts: 18772	Sat 01/03/15 03:50 AM
Wedding guest: Move due to Obama golf game 'not a negative thing' Heimel, her groom, Ed Mallue Jr., and the wedding party found an "equally beautiful" spot at the Kaneohe Klipper Golf Course at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, according to Dryer. Not only was there an ocean view as they had envisioned, they could see some golfers on the course. Adding to the unforgettable experience was an unexpected phone call from Obama, who phoned the couple to apologize for the mix-up. Dryer said the President told Mallue, also an Army captain, "If I had skipped the 16th hole, I would have had a better score." "He didn't know about it," Dryer said of Obama. Weeks before their wedding, Heimel and Mallue had invited the President to attend, knowing he and his family would be making their annual trip to Hawaii. The newlyweds got what they wanted after all. If they aren't complaining about President Obama, then why should anyone else complain? They aren't complaining because they know they would get some crap duty in the South Pole. Officer's of the military who value their career know better then to speak out against the Fuhrer. If the Fuhrer had any class, he would have attended. What a POS. or maybe they aren't complaining because they aren't crybabies and they had fair WARNING and KNOWLEDGE ahead of time that it might happen , complete with quite a beautiful back up plan,,,lol There would be almost NO warning. The presidents personal plans, dates and times are kept a secret for security purposes. They knew squat.

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Sat 01/03/15 11:07 AM
Wedding guest: Move due to Obama golf game 'not a negative thing' Heimel, her groom, Ed Mallue Jr., and the wedding party found an "equally beautiful" spot at the Kaneohe Klipper Golf Course at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, according to Dryer. Not only was there an ocean view as they had envisioned, they could see some golfers on the course. Adding to the unforgettable experience was an unexpected phone call from Obama, who phoned the couple to apologize for the mix-up. Dryer said the President told Mallue, also an Army captain, "If I had skipped the 16th hole, I would have had a better score." "He didn't know about it," Dryer said of Obama. Weeks before their wedding, Heimel and Mallue had invited the President to attend, knowing he and his family would be making their annual trip to Hawaii. The newlyweds got what they wanted after all. If they aren't complaining about President Obama, then why should anyone else complain? They aren't complaining because they know they would get some crap duty in the South Pole. Officer's of the military who value their career know better then to speak out against the Fuhrer. If the Fuhrer had any class, he would have attended. What a POS. or maybe they aren't complaining because they aren't crybabies and they had fair WARNING and KNOWLEDGE ahead of time that it might happen , complete with quite a beautiful back up plan,,,lol There would be almost NO warning. The presidents personal plans, dates and times are kept a secret for security purposes. They knew squat. so determined to find something to complain about,,,, there are WELL known places that presidents go,, and WHEN they travel through those areas there is a good chance they will GO THERE before people make reservations in these places, they can be INFORMED that IF the president comes through they will have to be moved this couple, BOTH MILITARY, worked with a planner who had IN THEIR CONTRACT the disclaimer that IF the president came through to play they would be moved this couple , BOTH MILITARY, understood that ahead of time this couple, BOTH MILITARY, picked several other locations IN THE CONTRACT with their planner that they wanted IN THE CASE that the president came through this couple , BOTH MILITARY, got to wed in a location they chose,, and they aren't complaining,, because they are disciplined and because they signed a CONTRACT agreeing to everything that happened,, and because they still married in a place THEY CHOSE ,,,,clear yet?

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Sat 01/03/15 12:41 PM
Wedding guest: Move due to Obama golf game 'not a negative thing' Heimel, her groom, Ed Mallue Jr., and the wedding party found an "equally beautiful" spot at the Kaneohe Klipper Golf Course at Marine Corps Base Hawaii, according to Dryer. Not only was there an ocean view as they had envisioned, they could see some golfers on the course. Adding to the unforgettable experience was an unexpected phone call from Obama, who phoned the couple to apologize for the mix-up. Dryer said the President told Mallue, also an Army captain, "If I had skipped the 16th hole, I would have had a better score." "He didn't know about it," Dryer said of Obama. Weeks before their wedding, Heimel and Mallue had invited the President to attend, knowing he and his family would be making their annual trip to Hawaii. The newlyweds got what they wanted after all. If they aren't complaining about President Obama, then why should anyone else complain? They aren't complaining because they know they would get some crap duty in the South Pole. Officer's of the military who value their career know better then to speak out against the Fuhrer. If the Fuhrer had any class, he would have attended. What a POS. or maybe they aren't complaining because they aren't crybabies and they had fair WARNING and KNOWLEDGE ahead of time that it might happen , complete with quite a beautiful back up plan,,,lol There would be almost NO warning. The presidents personal plans, dates and times are kept a secret for security purposes. They knew squat. so determined to find something to complain about,,,, there are WELL known places that presidents go,, and WHEN they travel through those areas there is a good chance they will GO THERE before people make reservations in these places, they can be INFORMED that IF the president comes through they will have to be moved this couple, BOTH MILITARY, worked with a planner who had IN THEIR CONTRACT the disclaimer that IF the president came through to play they would be moved this couple , BOTH MILITARY, understood that ahead of time this couple, BOTH MILITARY, picked several other locations IN THE CONTRACT with their planner that they wanted IN THE CASE that the president came through this couple , BOTH MILITARY, got to wed in a location they chose,, and they aren't complaining,, because they are disciplined and because they signed a CONTRACT agreeing to everything that happened,, and because they still married in a place THEY CHOSE ,,,,clear yet? Absolutely clear, still no clue eh? Absolutely clear, add any spin to keep from acknowledging reality! Absolutely clear, the subjective would be preferred over the objective any time by yourself!!!

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Sat 01/03/15 05:39 PM Edited by msharmony on Sat 01/03/15 05:43 PM
ahh,, the no spin = spin antagonist ,,, never doubted the input was coming,,,,thanx for not disappointing and thanks for yet another SUBJECTIVE critique of my post,,, and thanx mingle for the OBJECTIVE thread that supplies a place for multiple points of view,,,

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Sat 01/03/15 06:17 PM
ahh,, the no spin = spin antagonist ,,, never doubted the input was coming,,,,thanx for not disappointing and thanks for yet another SUBJECTIVE critique of my post,,, and thanx mingle for the OBJECTIVE thread that supplies a place for multiple points of view,,, Wow, you really do need to buy a good dictionary and use it: Objective: Based upon observation of measurable facts. Subjective: Personal opinions, assumptions, interpretations and beliefs So what we really have is an objective analysis based on the observation of your subjective opinion of that which you haven't a clue, hence using any spin deemed necessary to arrive at a preconceived conclusion based on what one wants to be true. An emotional reaction. And to believe these threads have anything to do with the objective would be just another spin, the total lack of comprehension of what a "forum" entails. But by that reasoning, one could understand how another would consider opinions objective.

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Sat 01/03/15 07:02 PM Edited by msharmony on Sat 01/03/15 07:13 PM
y dontcha put your dictionary out there next to websters or Cambridge, and see how it does...lol until then, IM fine with the dictionary sources which state that the difference between objective and subjective is FACTS what I posted was a list of FACTS, nothing to do with my beliefs ,,couldn't be clearer than that , (whether it could be more clear is totally my SUBJECTIVE observation based on my feelings though,,,lol),,,

alnewman Joined Sat 12/14/13 Posts: 4009	Sun 01/04/15 10:28 AM
y dontcha put your dictionary out there next to websters or Cambridge, and see how it does...lol until then, IM fine with the dictionary sources which state that the difference between objective and subjective is FACTS what I posted was a list of FACTS, nothing to do with my beliefs ,,couldn't be clearer than that , (whether it could be more clear is totally my SUBJECTIVE observation based on my feelings though,,,lol),,, Actually it is measurable facts, aren't any in your post, just perceptions, subjective. But I stand corrected, it isn't the dictionary that is needed.

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sun 01/04/15 10:59 AM


msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Sun 01/04/15 11:04 AM
y dontcha put your dictionary out there next to websters or Cambridge, and see how it does...lol until then, IM fine with the dictionary sources which state that the difference between objective and subjective is FACTS what I posted was a list of FACTS, nothing to do with my beliefs ,,couldn't be clearer than that , (whether it could be more clear is totally my SUBJECTIVE observation based on my feelings though,,,lol),,, Actually it is measurable facts, aren't any in your post, just perceptions, subjective. But I stand corrected, it isn't the dictionary that is needed. something our posts in this thread have in common then no 'measurable' facts,,,lol have a great day,,

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Sun 01/04/15 11:04 AM
thats funny actually,,,

davidben1 Joined Wed 12/05/07 Posts: 6120	Sun 01/04/15 07:02 PM Edited by davidben1 on Sun 01/04/15 07:30 PM
it seems the biggest gravest mistake in all self judgement from the beginning was to think those in power wanted power for anything besides the fringe benefits ultimate power does afford? 2015... shall bring curses to all self power.

alleoops Joined Sat 08/06/11 Posts: 10832	Sun 01/04/15 07:27 PM
it seems the biggest gravest mistake in self judgement from the beginning, was that in power wanted power for anything besides the fringe benefits ultimate power affords? Yea, and all the perks too.

davidben1 Joined Wed 12/05/07 Posts: 6120	Sun 01/04/15 07:31 PM
in 2015, those in it for the perks come crashing down.