100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Obama, Holder, Sharpton Where Are You? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
I have mentioned before,, 1 sexual assaults, and 1 attempted (Where our fight resulted in him running off and me running the OTHER WAY) , would that count as 'strong arm'? your experience is unfortunate, as was mine, but it still doesn't change how I feel about the Wilson/Brown experience,,, I am sorry for your situation, I really am, one thing I hate more then anything are rapists and child abusers but you WERE able to get away. Even if you weren't and you were in fear of your life you could have used whatever force necessary to stop the situation. This is a different situation, its a situation where its your job to take a criminal into custody. The situation you aren't able to get away and it's a fisticuffs with someone high on drugs who just committed a crime and knows he's screwed if the cops get them. Fight or flight kicks in and they WILL do ANYTHING to get away and I have seen some weird crap and attempts. Evidence shows Brown was in the cops car attacking the officer. Most officers have three guns in the front seat of their car, the one on their hip, a shotgun and a backup gun on their person or quickly accessible in the front seat (and I just found out that most State Troopers and Sheriff's Deputies have fully automatic weapons in their trunks here in Nevada) not to mention the numerous other weapons on the officers person Brown was in proximity to. In just about every poll taken an overwhelming majority thought Wilson was justified, not to mention the African Americans who sat on the grand jury. my experiences and opinions aren't shaped by what others choose to believe I haven't spoken to ANYONE on the grand jury to hear the process they went through,,, Zimmerman was acquitted 'unanimously' as well, but we later learned there was quite a bit of 'persuading' happening in the process and not a case of everyone just believing it was the case,,,, I do not believe there was a need to escalate to killing the suspect after he fled I do not believe that after he fled he suddenly turned and just 'charged' either,,,, ,,I do not even see the point in rehashing beliefs about that one incident as that officer was NEVER going to be charged and never will be the bigger picture is the abuse of power and the corruption within certain police departments that has been given a free pass for too long,,, Bull, bull, and more bull. There is not a single factual statement, just what one would like to be factual. Always something that those involved must have missed. Somehow that should have believed that which should have been and as such made a bad decision. All those people directly involved, but your judgement is what they should have chosen. Two thugs, both dead, thank god, end of story. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Ive said before,, the grand jury has spoken and it cant be undone, but it was certainly the tip of an iceberg that has been developing for a LONG TIME,,, Grand Jury, a term with which you seem to be totally unfamiliar. Do you actually know what a grand jury is? It would seem the answer to the question would be a resounding, NO. from typing the obvious that the grand jury made a decision and that the grand jury decision cant be undone you ASSume, there is uncertainty about what a Grand Jury is? ,,interesting,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do you understand what TRAINING , oath to protect and serve and a PAYCHECK are? adrenaline would explain a confrontation when one thinks their authority is unquestionable and their mannerism not able to be held to account, adrenaline explains most aggression between males, adrenaline even explains a struggle for a gun if even one party who is hyped up is known to have one, adrenaline explains shooting when one thinks the gun they have will be used against them, adrenaline doesn't explain having to fill someone with six bullets after they have put over a hundred yards behind them and away from the altercation,,, adrenaline would explain someone running after being shot,, it would not explain suddenly choosing to CHARGE after the danger they ran from so hard that one has lost their shoe,,,, As Ive said before,, the grand jury has spoken and it cant be undone, but it was certainly the tip of an iceberg that has been developing for a LONG TIME,,, Again, there was no football field between the officer and brown. This would indicate that the distance was closed (like, by Brown running back). There is no way a police officer (unless he was an Olympic shooter) could land that many shots on a moving target with a pistol at 100+ yards. How would adrenaline not explain charging at someone? You mentioned it makes people panic and do stupid things. You assume Brown was of sound mind. He had proven from his violent behavior he was not. A person of sound mind would not attack an armed officer, attempt to disarm him, and expect not to be met by deadly force. I would also find it difficult to believe he was not under an adrenaline rush either, further increasing the possibility of making illogical decisions. Just saying... the police officer landed only half of his shots the police officer gave chase (that explains a closed distance) I agree he behaved illegally, irresponsibility, and stupidly I still will not believe that when he was within reach of the gun he ran away but when the gun was being fired at him he decided to go towards the shots,,, unless video shows otherwise,,,and I doubt that video is forthcoming they were NEVER going to charge that officer, they hired him from a corrupt department in the first place and they strongly BLUE WALL(?) Each other,,, they leaked that video at the store they leaked a story about an orbital socket blowout they lied about the distance of the crime scene the prosecutor presented more evidence for the defense than he did to try to get an indictment and then to add insult to injury his conference to explain the finding further disparaged his OWN witnesses ,,,,,,,people are not going to change their mind , its not worth recapping,, I just hope that its the first step in changes being made,,, What Kool Aid are you drinking? The ONLY evidence to him being chased and putting his hands in the air is another convicted criminal who had active warrants out for him for lying to police and lying under oath. Luckily forensics showed the truth. Even your story has changed, do you just make up $hit to fit your race baiting agenda? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nothing in my opinion changed
forensics showed he was shot at the car and he was shot while away from the car and that the distance between the officer and he was closed everything in between is filled by 'belief' and opinion,,, |
|
|
|
|
