Community > General Discussion

Topic: Languages?
bastet126 Joined Fri 12/07/07 Posts: 15553	Fri 10/31/14 05:29 PM
I don't think so, but view my work, it is all posted for free on the Internet Archive. all work and no play will put your love life in the...archives.

unknown_romeo Joined Wed 03/26/14 Posts: 7691	Fri 10/31/14 05:49 PM
I took a French class once. My kissing greatly improved.

em_CrazyGuy Joined Tue 10/28/14 Posts: 169	Sat 11/01/14 02:41 AM
Urdu , Hindi , Punjabi are fluent but dont have that much fluency in English , Siraiki , Hindko and jaangli

devildog123 Joined Mon 09/08/14 Posts: 3902	Sat 11/01/14 03:00 AM
English and Mandarin Chinese. but only enough of the Chinese to get me by.

devildog123 Joined Mon 09/08/14 Posts: 3902	Sat 11/01/14 03:33 AM
The OP just wanted to know if you spoke any other languages......sheesh I am sorry if I appear to be an idiot. But I have this little problem, I do what I want. I think as I think. And if it bothers you that not every body lives in a simple world, read the news. I never called you an idiot.....but I do think you are calling me one....but hey I don't care....I like my simple world and my simple life.....and FYI, I watch the news everyday Well, I don't have the stomach for it. But I have been working to solve problems no one else in history has been able to solve. I have done remarkably well with it. I would rather not watch the news, but change it. fascinating.. I am intrigued by problem solving. If you don't mind me asking. How many of these historical problem have you solved, meaning that, your work has been accepted by the proper entities as the answer..the solution to that problem. I would think accolades would be in order by these entities and the public.. at the very least. Which is the next big one on the radar?

Philosopher8659 Joined Tue 10/28/14 Posts: 37	Sat 11/01/14 11:52 AM Edited by Philosopher8659 on Sat 11/01/14 11:50 AM
Cool, you like Confucius? He was one of the leaders in understanding the relationship between language and psychology. ________________________ "��Tsze-lu said, "��The ruler of Wei has been waiting for you, in order with you to administer the government. What will you consider the first thing to be done?"�� The Master replied, "��What is necessary is to rectify names. "��So! indeed!" � said Tsze-lu. "��You are wide of the mark! Why must there be such a rectification?"�� The Master said, "��How uncultivated you are, Yu! A superior man, in regard to what he does not know, shows a cautious reserve. “If names be not correct, language is not in accordance with the truth of things. If language be not in accordance with the truth of things, affairs cannot be carried on to success. “When affairs cannot be carried on to success, proprieties and music do not flourish. When proprieties and music do not flourish, punishments will not be properly awarded. When punishments are not properly awarded, the people do not know how to move hand or foot. “Therefore, a superior man considers it necessary that the names he uses may be spoken appropriately, and also that what he speaks may be carried out appropriately. What the superior man requires is just that, in his words there may be nothing incorrect."�� Analects Confucius

Pinkbunny43 Joined Sun 05/12/13 Posts: 26547	Sat 11/01/14 11:54 AM
omg....really OP.....I speak english....I can speak some french and read some french.....I am currently trying my hand at Czech look^^^simple answer......

Philosopher8659 Joined Tue 10/28/14 Posts: 37	Sat 11/01/14 11:59 AM Edited by Philosopher8659 on Sat 11/01/14 12:07 PM
omg....really OP.....I speak english....I can speak some french and read some french.....I am currently trying my hand at Czech look^^^simple answer...... Okay, you like simple; There is a difference between parroting a language and speaking a language. There is a difference between appearance and reality. Reality is known through standards, i.e. just like language is expressed only when one knows the standards and abides by them. The most fundamental principle of language is its biological origin, its origin in physics, which determine the principles of language which are not taught today. If you want to understand how important the use of language is by standards, try this. The Difference between Man and Beast. https://archive.org/details/TheDifferenceBetweenManAndBeast

funkyfranky Joined Tue 05/01/12 Posts: 5966	Sat 11/01/14 01:08 PM
The question assumes that one has a definition of language. If one knew what that was, one would be familiar with a Two-Element Metaphysics being explored a long time ago, not only by ancient Greeks, but it is also fundamental to the Judeo-Christian Scripture. The Two-Element Metaphysics is based on the definition of a thing, and it is reflected in biology. It also means that there are fundamentally two branches of language, logics and analogics. Common grammars are logics. Now think about this. The human mind is wholly responsible for human behavior. The human mind functions only to the degree that principles of language are functionally resident in that mind. Therefore the foundation of human behavior can be traced back to the principles of language. Human psychology is derived from the principles of logic and analogic functionally resident in a mind. However, if the principles of language are not known, not recognized, etc, etc, one cannot claim to be fluent in any language. one eventually concludes that mankind is proto-linguistic, therefore pre-civil, and that there is no one fluent in any language, because we are proto-linguistic. Certain philosophers have made statements in regard to language and human behavior and they have never been understood. They could not be. Someday, maybe they will. I have developed an analogic that some have searched for, for a very long time, basic analog mathematics. What it demonstrates is that all of mathematics is derivable from simple Euclidean Geometry, effectively leaving the non-Euclidean Genius's with no math for their fantasies. Talking of great minds. If memory serves me right, I think it was Plato who once said, 'wise men speak because they have something to say, fools speak because they have to say something'.

funkyfranky Joined Tue 05/01/12 Posts: 5966	Sat 11/01/14 01:16 PM
The question assumes that one has a definition of language. If one knew what that was, one would be familiar with a Two-Element Metaphysics being explored a long time ago, not only by ancient Greeks, but it is also fundamental to the Judeo-Christian Scripture. The Two-Element Metaphysics is based on the definition of a thing, and it is reflected in biology. It also means that there are fundamentally two branches of language, logics and analogics. Common grammars are logics. Now think about this. The human mind is wholly responsible for human behavior. The human mind functions only to the degree that principles of language are functionally resident in that mind. Therefore the foundation of human behavior can be traced back to the principles of language. Human psychology is derived from the principles of logic and analogic functionally resident in a mind. However, if the principles of language are not known, not recognized, etc, etc, one cannot claim to be fluent in any language. one eventually concludes that mankind is proto-linguistic, therefore pre-civil, and that there is no one fluent in any language, because we are proto-linguistic. Certain philosophers have made statements in regard to language and human behavior and they have never been understood. They could not be. Someday, maybe they will. I have developed an analogic that some have searched for, for a very long time, basic analog mathematics. What it demonstrates is that all of mathematics is derivable from simple Euclidean Geometry, effectively leaving the non-Euclidean Genius's with no math for their fantasies. Talking of great minds. If memory serves me right, I think it was Plato who once said, 'wise men speak because they have something to say, fools speak because they have to say something'. I have posted several translations of the works of Plato in audio book form on the Internet Archive. If you can find that quote, I would be really surprised. However, thank you for exampling your own quote. there you go Mr philosopher http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8808-wise-men-speak-because-they-have-something-to-say-fools

unknown_romeo Joined Wed 03/26/14 Posts: 7691	Sat 11/01/14 01:16 PM
This thread has been hijacked

funkyfranky Joined Tue 05/01/12 Posts: 5966	Sat 11/01/14 01:17 PM
The question assumes that one has a definition of language. If one knew what that was, one would be familiar with a Two-Element Metaphysics being explored a long time ago, not only by ancient Greeks, but it is also fundamental to the Judeo-Christian Scripture. The Two-Element Metaphysics is based on the definition of a thing, and it is reflected in biology. It also means that there are fundamentally two branches of language, logics and analogics. Common grammars are logics. Now think about this. The human mind is wholly responsible for human behavior. The human mind functions only to the degree that principles of language are functionally resident in that mind. Therefore the foundation of human behavior can be traced back to the principles of language. Human psychology is derived from the principles of logic and analogic functionally resident in a mind. However, if the principles of language are not known, not recognized, etc, etc, one cannot claim to be fluent in any language. one eventually concludes that mankind is proto-linguistic, therefore pre-civil, and that there is no one fluent in any language, because we are proto-linguistic. Certain philosophers have made statements in regard to language and human behavior and they have never been understood. They could not be. Someday, maybe they will. I have developed an analogic that some have searched for, for a very long time, basic analog mathematics. What it demonstrates is that all of mathematics is derivable from simple Euclidean Geometry, effectively leaving the non-Euclidean Genius's with no math for their fantasies. Talking of great minds. If memory serves me right, I think it was Plato who once said, 'wise men speak because they have something to say, fools speak because they have to say something'. I have posted several translations of the works of Plato in audio book form on the Internet Archive. If you can find that quote, I would be really surprised. However, thank you for exampling your own quote. there you go Mr philosopher http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/8808-wise-men-speak-because-they-have-something-to-say-fools Oh and by the way, it's Plato's quote, not mine, I don't pretend to have half the brain he had.

funkyfranky Joined Tue 05/01/12 Posts: 5966	Sat 11/01/14 01:18 PM
This thread has been hijacked aaawwww I know, I'm sorry my friend

unknown_romeo Joined Wed 03/26/14 Posts: 7691	Sat 11/01/14 01:24 PM
aaawwww I know, I'm sorry my friend No worries....its interesting reading all the comments

unknown_romeo Joined Wed 03/26/14 Posts: 7691	Sat 11/01/14 01:28 PM
^^^^ speaks the language of love .... Laughing and a few others ... Back on topic ;-) hiya Romeo :-) I like the language of love Lol

unknown_romeo Joined Wed 03/26/14 Posts: 7691	Sat 11/01/14 01:35 PM
Romeo .. Romeo .. Where for art thou Romeo ... I am naked .... Laughing :-) Brilliant, i'll be right over LOL

soufiehere Joined Sat 10/24/09 Posts: 45403	Sat 11/01/14 02:10 PM
Edited for disparaging remarks between members. Please stay on topic. soufie Site Moderator

Cutiepieforyou Joined Wed 10/17/07 Posts: 43085	Sat 11/01/14 03:57 PM
What Languages can you speak fluently? Please share. I'm fluent in Italian, Spanish, Greek, Macedonian, French, German and a few African Languages. English. I love Spanish, but am not fluent.

funkyfranky Joined Tue 05/01/12 Posts: 5966	Sat 11/01/14 04:02 PM
Romeo .. Romeo .. Where for art thou Romeo ... I am naked .... Laughing :-) For never was there a story of more woe, than that of Juliet and her Romeo

green407 Joined Fri 09/19/14 Posts: 1563	Sat 11/01/14 04:28 PM
I speak English fluently, I can read and speak Spanish, Portuguese, Netherlands, some Afrikaans, some Frisian, and some Deutsch. Am in the process of learning Latin.